Andrada Emanuel, Hildebrandt Gregor, Witte Hartmut, Fischer Martin S
Institute of Zoology and Evolutionary Research, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Group of Biomechatronics, Institute of Mechatronic System Integration, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jul 7;11:1193177. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1193177. eCollection 2023.
Dogs () prefer the walk at lower speeds and the more economical trot at speeds ranging from 0.5 Fr up to 3 Fr. Important works have helped to understand these gaits at the levels of the center of mass, joint mechanics, and muscular control. However, less is known about the global dynamics for limbs and if these are gait or breed-specific. For walk and trot, we analyzed dogs' global dynamics, based on motion capture and single leg kinetic data, recorded from treadmill locomotion of French Bulldog ( = 4), Whippet ( = 5), Malinois ( = 4), and Beagle ( = 5). Dogs' pelvic and thoracic axial leg functions combined compliance with leg lengthening. Thoracic limbs were stiffer than the pelvic limbs and absorbed energy in the scapulothoracic joint. Dogs' ground reaction forces (GRF) formed two virtual pivot points (VPP) during walk and trot each. One emerged for the thoracic (fore) limbs (VPP) and is roughly located above and caudally to the scapulothoracic joint. The second is located roughly above and cranially to the hip joint (VPP). The positions of VPPs and the patterns of the limbs' axial and tangential projections of the GRF were gaits but not always breeds-related. When they existed, breed-related changes were mainly exposed by the French Bulldog. During trot, positions of the VPPs tended to be closer to the hip joint or the scapulothoracic joint, and variability between and within breeds lessened compared to walk. In some dogs, VPP was located below the pelvis during trot. Further analyses revealed that leg length and not breed may better explain differences in the vertical position of VPP or the horizontal position of VPP. The vertical position of VPP was only influenced by gait, while the horizontal position of VPP was not breed or gait-related. Accordingly, torque profiles in the scapulothoracic joint were likely between breeds while hip torque profiles were size-related. In dogs, gait and leg length are likely the main VPPs positions' predictors. Thus, variations of VPP positions may follow a reduction of limb work. Stability issues need to be addressed in further studies.
狗更喜欢以较低速度行走,以及在0.5弗隆至3弗隆的速度范围内以更经济的小跑方式行进。重要的研究成果有助于我们在质心、关节力学和肌肉控制层面理解这些步态。然而,对于四肢的整体动力学以及它们是否因步态或品种而异,我们了解得较少。对于行走和小跑,我们基于从法国斗牛犬(n = 4)、惠比特犬(n = 5)、马里努阿犬(n = 4)和比格犬(n = 5)在跑步机上运动所记录的动作捕捉和单腿动力学数据,分析了狗的整体动力学。狗的骨盆和胸部轴向腿部功能结合了腿部延长的顺应性。胸部肢体比骨盆肢体更僵硬,并在肩胛胸关节处吸收能量。狗的地面反作用力(GRF)在行走和小跑过程中各形成两个虚拟枢轴点(VPP)。一个出现在胸部(前)肢(VPP₁),大致位于肩胛胸关节上方和尾侧。第二个大致位于髋关节上方和头侧(VPP₂)。VPP的位置以及GRF的肢体轴向和切向投影模式与步态有关,但并不总是与品种有关。当存在品种差异时,主要体现在法国斗牛犬身上。在小跑过程中,VPP的位置往往更靠近髋关节或肩胛胸关节,与行走相比,品种间和品种内的变异性减小。在一些狗中,小跑时VPP位于骨盆下方。进一步分析表明,腿长而非品种可能更好地解释VPP垂直位置或水平位置的差异。VPP的垂直位置仅受步态影响,而VPP的水平位置与品种或步态无关。因此,肩胛胸关节的扭矩分布在品种间可能有所不同,而髋关节扭矩分布与体型有关。在狗身上,步态和腿长可能是VPP位置的主要预测因素。因此,VPP位置的变化可能伴随着肢体工作量的减少。稳定性问题需要在进一步的研究中加以解决。