Abo-Elsoud Mohamed, Awad Mostafa I, Abdel Karim Mahmoud, Khaled Sherif, Abdelmoneim Mohamed
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo 11562, Egypt.
Department of Trauma and Orthopedics, Mataria Teaching Hospital, Cairo 4540046, Egypt.
World J Orthop. 2023 Jul 18;14(7):562-571. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i7.562.
Reconstruction of the pelvic ring anatomy in unstable anterior pelvic ring injuries is a significant step to reduce the mortality rate associated with these injuries efficiently. There is a debate on using either an anterior subcutaneous pelvis internal fixator (INFIX) or an anterior supra-acetabular external fixator (EXFIX) to manage an unstable anterior pelvic ring fracture.
To compare the functional and radiological outcomes and complications of INFIX EXFIX in managing unstable pelvic ring injuries.
A prospective cohort study included 54 patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures. The patients were divided into two groups; the INFIX group, in which 30 cases were fixed by INFIX, and the EXFIX group, in which 24 patients were treated by EXFIX. The average age in the EXFIX group was 31.17 years (16-57 years), while in the INFIX group, it was 34.5 years (17-53 years). The study included 20 (66.7%) males and 10 (33.3%) females in the INFIX group and 10 (41.7%) males and 14 (58.3%) females in the EXFIX group. The radiological outcomes were evaluated using Matta and Tornetta's score, and the functional outcomes using the Majeed score.
The results revealed a statistically significant difference between both groups ( = 0.013) regarding radiological outcomes, according to Matta and Tornetta's score in favor of the INFIX group. Sitting, standing, and walking abilities were measured at a 3-mo follow-up visit using Majeed score modules. It was significantly better among the INFIX group than the EXFIX group in all three modules. At the final follow-up, both groups had no statistically significant difference according to the Majeed score; 92.35 in the INFIX group and 90.99 in the EXFIX group ( = 0.513). A lower surgical site infection rate was noticed in the INFIX group ( = 0.007).
Anterior subcutaneous pelvis INFIX is associated with better radiological outcomes and a lower infection rate than anterior supra-acetabular EXFIX in managing patients with unstable anterior pelvic ring fractures.
重建不稳定的骨盆前环损伤的骨盆环解剖结构是有效降低与这些损伤相关死亡率的重要一步。对于使用前路皮下骨盆内固定器(INFIX)还是前路髋臼上外固定器(EXFIX)来治疗不稳定的骨盆前环骨折存在争议。
比较INFIX和EXFIX治疗不稳定骨盆环损伤的功能和影像学结果及并发症。
一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了54例不稳定骨盆环骨折患者。患者分为两组;INFIX组,30例采用INFIX固定;EXFIX组,24例采用EXFIX治疗。EXFIX组的平均年龄为31.17岁(16 - 57岁),而INFIX组为34.5岁(17 - 53岁)。INFIX组包括20例(66.7%)男性和10例(33.3%)女性,EXFIX组包括10例(41.7%)男性和14例(58.3%)女性。影像学结果采用Matta和Tornetta评分评估,功能结果采用Majeed评分评估。
根据Matta和Tornetta评分,两组在影像学结果方面存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.013),支持INFIX组。在3个月随访时,使用Majeed评分模块测量坐、站和行走能力。在所有三个模块中,INFIX组均显著优于EXFIX组。在最终随访时,根据Majeed评分,两组无统计学显著差异;INFIX组为92.35,EXFIX组为90.99(P = 0.513)。INFIX组的手术部位感染率较低(P = 0.007)。
在治疗不稳定骨盆前环骨折患者时,前路皮下骨盆INFIX比前路髋臼上EXFIX具有更好的影像学结果和更低的感染率。