Jasper Sophie, Keim Ulrike, Leiter Ulrike, Amaral Teresa, Flatz Lukas, Forschner Andrea
Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2023 Oct;21(10):1137-1146. doi: 10.1111/ddg.15164. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
The melanoma guideline is mainly based on the AJCC stage. There is no difference according to histological subtypes such as superficial spreading melanoma (SSM), lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) or nodular malignant melanoma (NM). We aimed to evaluate whether patients with LMM have a different clinical course from patients with SSM/NM. This is particularly important as adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy is approved for stage IIB and IIC melanoma.
Data were extracted from the Central Registry of Malignant Melanoma. Only patients with LMM, SSM, and NM of the head and neck with primary diagnosis between 01/01/2000 and 12/31/2019 were included. Progression-free survival (PFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and pattern of metastases were analyzed for the LMM group compared to SSM/NM.
The LMM cohort (n = 902) had significantly better MSS than the SSM/NM cohort (n = 604). There was no difference in PFS. The 5-year MSS of the stage II LMM cohort was 88.5% (95% CI 81.4-95.6) compared to 79.7% (95% CI 72.8-86.6) in the stage II SSM/NM cohort.
It does not appear appropriate to use adjuvant therapy in stage II LMM patients to the same extent as in patients with SSM/NM.
黑色素瘤诊疗指南主要基于美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期。对于浅表扩散性黑色素瘤(SSM)、恶性雀斑样痣黑色素瘤(LMM)或结节性恶性黑色素瘤(NM)等组织学亚型,并无差异。我们旨在评估LMM患者与SSM/NM患者的临床病程是否不同。鉴于IIB期和IIC期黑色素瘤已获批辅助抗PD-1治疗,这一点尤为重要。
数据取自恶性黑色素瘤中央登记处。仅纳入2000年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间初诊为头颈部LMM、SSM和NM的患者。将LMM组与SSM/NM组的无进展生存期(PFS)、黑色素瘤特异性生存期(MSS)及转移模式进行分析。
LMM队列(n = 902)的MSS显著优于SSM/NM队列(n = 604)。PFS无差异。II期LMM队列的5年MSS为88.5%(95%CI 81.4 - 95.6),而II期SSM/NM队列的为79.7%(95%CI 72.8 - 86.6)。
对II期LMM患者采用与SSM/NM患者相同程度的辅助治疗似乎并不合适。