Health Services, Policy, & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Sep 2;36(5):984-1003. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2023.2238534. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
Following the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) controversial approval of aducanumab for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) used its National Coverage Determination process to determine its coverage for Medicare beneficiaries. A public comment period was available for 30 days between July 12, 2021 and August 11, 2021. This study analyzed the 132 comments submitted in the first public comment period. The comments were downloaded from CMS' publicly-available website and analyzed to identify key themes across stakeholders. Three major themes were identified. Those supporting CMS approving aducanumab argued FDA's approval was appropriate and the final decision for treatment should be left to patients and their doctors. Those against or uncertain of CMS approving aducanumab stated concerns about its clinical benefits, risks, burdens, and costs; many of these stakeholders instead argued CMS institute Coverage with Evidence Development. Lastly, regardless of perspective, stakeholders encouraged CMS to cover diagnostic tools to support Alzheimer's disease research and treatments. Our analysis identifies key themes and policy implications of CMS' decision, including acknowledgment of comments and subsequent changes to CMS' determination, highlighting the value of public comments as a resource to understand stakeholder perspectives on policy decisions.
继食品和药物管理局(FDA)有争议地批准 aducanumab 用于治疗阿尔茨海默病之后,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)利用其国家覆盖范围确定程序来确定其对医疗保险受益人的覆盖范围。2021 年 7 月 12 日至 8 月 11 日期间,有 30 天的公众意见征询期。本研究分析了第一个公众意见征询期提交的 132 条意见。这些意见从 CMS 可公开获得的网站上下载,并进行了分析,以确定利益相关者之间的关键主题。确定了三个主要主题。那些支持 CMS 批准 aducanumab 的人认为 FDA 的批准是合适的,治疗的最终决定应该留给患者及其医生。那些反对或不确定 CMS 是否批准 aducanumab 的人表示对其临床效益、风险、负担和成本表示担忧;许多这些利益相关者相反主张 CMS 实施有证据开发的覆盖范围。最后,无论观点如何,利益相关者都鼓励 CMS 覆盖诊断工具,以支持阿尔茨海默病的研究和治疗。我们的分析确定了 CMS 决策的关键主题和政策影响,包括对意见的认可以及对 CMS 决定的后续更改,突出了公众意见作为了解利益相关者对政策决策看法的资源的价值。