• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动驾驶汽车道路测试的安全风险评估。

Safety risk assessment for autonomous vehicle road testing.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(7):652-661. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2235454. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2023.2235454
PMID:37486240
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Road testing can accelerate the development and validation of autonomous vehicles (AVs). AV road testing can come with high safety risks, particularly in a complex road traffic environment, due to the immaturity of AV technology. A priori safety risk assessments of the road traffic environment before AV road testing are of great importance, allow the quantifying of risk levels in different road scenarios, and provide guidelines for AV road testing in low to high-risk environments.

METHODS

This study proposes a framework, namely Safety Risk Assessment for AV road testing (SRAAV), based on the probability and severity of five categories of potential AV accidents. Four groups of influencing factors are considered comprehensively in assessing AV safety risk, and their impacts are quantified using impact coefficients derived from a Bayesian network and empirical AV road testing data. The safety risk is assessed on a road section level, based on which an overall risk level is defined for a corridor and a region. Afterwards, the quantified safety risk is classified into four levels according to expert experience and knowledge, through a questionnaire survey.

RESULTS

Applications of the proposed SRAAV framework are conducted for urban roads in Shanghai, and expressways in Shanghai and Gothenburg. The assessment results are validated using disengagement data from AV road testing. The results show that the SRAAV framework and its models could estimate the safety risk levels of road traffic environments for AV road testing in a sound way and have the flexibility for further extensions to be made.

CONCLUSIONS

The framework and assessment results can provide technical support for determining where and when to grant permission for public roads to be used for AV road testing, and how to choose public roads from a low to a high risk level, guaranteeing the safety of AV public road testing.

摘要

目的

道路测试可以加速自动驾驶汽车(AV)的开发和验证。由于 AV 技术的不成熟,AV 道路测试可能会带来很高的安全风险,尤其是在复杂的道路交通环境中。在进行 AV 道路测试之前,对道路交通环境进行先验安全风险评估非常重要,这可以量化不同道路场景中的风险水平,并为 AV 在低风险到高风险环境中的道路测试提供指导。

方法

本研究提出了一个框架,即自动驾驶汽车道路测试安全风险评估(SRAAV),该框架基于五类潜在 AV 事故的发生概率和严重程度。在评估 AV 安全风险时,综合考虑了四组影响因素,并使用贝叶斯网络和经验性 AV 道路测试数据得出的影响系数对其进行量化。基于路段水平评估安全风险,并根据走廊和区域的整体风险水平进行定义。之后,根据专家经验和知识,通过问卷调查将量化后的安全风险分为四个等级。

结果

将所提出的 SRAAV 框架应用于上海的城市道路以及上海和哥德堡的高速公路。使用来自 AV 道路测试的脱离数据验证评估结果。结果表明,SRAAV 框架及其模型可以合理地估计 AV 道路测试道路交通环境的安全风险水平,并且具有进一步扩展的灵活性。

结论

该框架和评估结果可为确定何时何地允许公共道路用于 AV 道路测试以及如何从低风险道路选择到高风险道路提供技术支持,从而保证 AV 公共道路测试的安全。

相似文献

1
Safety risk assessment for autonomous vehicle road testing.自动驾驶汽车道路测试的安全风险评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(7):652-661. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2235454. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
Quantifying the Impact of Deployments of Autonomous Vehicles and Intelligent Roads on Road Safety in China: A Country-Level Modeling Study.量化自动驾驶车辆和智能道路部署对中国道路安全的影响:一项国家级建模研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4069. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054069.
3
Advancing investigation of automated vehicle crashes using text analytics of crash narratives and Bayesian analysis.利用事故叙述的文本分析和贝叶斯分析推进自动驾驶汽车事故的调查。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Mar;181:106932. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106932. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
4
Approaching autonomous driving with cautious optimism: analysis of road traffic injuries involving autonomous vehicles based on field test data.带着谨慎的乐观态度迈向自动驾驶:基于实地测试数据对涉及自动驾驶车辆的道路交通伤害进行分析。
Inj Prev. 2021 Feb;27(1):42-47. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043402. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
5
A Bayesian extreme value theory modelling framework to assess corridor-wide pedestrian safety using autonomous vehicle sensor data.基于贝叶斯极值理论的建模框架,利用自动驾驶车辆传感器数据评估走廊式行人安全。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Feb;195:107416. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107416. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
6
Stated preference analysis of autonomous vehicle among bicyclists and pedestrians in Pittsburgh using Bayesian Networks.基于贝叶斯网络的匹兹堡自行车骑行者和行人对自动驾驶汽车的意愿调查分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Nov;192:107278. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107278. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
7
Road traffic safety assessment in self-driving vehicles based on time-to-collision with motion orientation.基于碰撞时间和运动方向的自动驾驶车辆道路交通安全评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Oct;191:107172. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107172. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
8
Sharing roads with automated vehicles: A questionnaire investigation from drivers', cyclists' and pedestrians' perspectives.与自动驾驶车辆共享道路:来自驾驶员、骑车者和行人视角的问卷调查。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107093. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107093. Epub 2023 May 5.
9
Agricultural vehicles and rural road safety: tackling a persistent problem.农业车辆与农村道路安全:解决一个长期存在的问题。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(1):94-101. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.789135.
10
Exploring the associations between driving volatility and autonomous vehicle hazardous scenarios: Insights from field operational test data.探索驾驶波动性与自动驾驶车辆危险场景之间的关联:来自现场运行测试数据的见解。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Mar;166:106537. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106537. Epub 2021 Dec 21.