• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多靶点粪便 DNA 检测后,最低基线检测者的肿瘤诊断能力得到增强。

Neoplasia Diagnosis After Multi-target Stool DNA Is Enhanced Among Lowest Baseline Detectors.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Sep;68(9):3721-3731. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08038-5. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10620-023-08038-5
PMID:37486445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10882559/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Variation in colorectal neoplasia detection limits the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy. By evaluating neoplasia detection rates of individual colonoscopists, we aimed to quantify the effects of pre-procedural knowledge of a positive (+) multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) on colonoscopy quality metrics.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified physicians who performed a high volume of + mt-sDNA colonoscopies; colorectal neoplasia at post-mt-sDNA colonoscopy was recorded. These colonoscopists were stratified into quartiles based on baseline adenoma detection rates. Baseline colonoscopy adenoma detection rates and sessile serrated lesion detection rates were compared to post-mt-sDNA colonoscopy neoplasia diagnosis rates among each quartile. Withdrawal times were measured from negative exams.

RESULTS

During the study period (2014-17) the highest quartile of physicians by volume of post-mt-sDNA colonoscopies were evaluated. Among thirty-five gastroenterologists, their median screening colonoscopy adenoma detection rate was 32% (IQR, 28-39%) and serrated lesion detection rate was 13% (8-15%). After + mt-sDNA, adenoma diagnosis increased to 47% (36-56%) and serrated lesion diagnosis increased to 31% (17-42%) (both p < 0.0001). Median withdrawal time increased from 10 (7-13) to 12 (10-17) minutes (p < 0.0001) and was proportionate across quartiles. After + mt-sDNA, lower baseline detectors had disproportionately higher rates of adenoma diagnosis in female versus male patients (p = 0.048) and higher serrated neoplasia diagnosis rates among all patients (p = 0.0092).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of + mt-sDNA enriches neoplasia diagnosis compared to average risk screening exams. Adenomatous and serrated lesion diagnosis was magnified among those with lower adenoma detection rates. Awareness of the mt-sDNA result may increase physician attention during colonoscopy. Pre-procedure knowledge of a positive mt-sDNA test improves neoplasia diagnosis rates among colonoscopists with lower baseline adenoma detection rates, independent of withdrawal time.

摘要

背景和目的

结直肠腺瘤检出率的差异限制了筛查结肠镜的效果。通过评估个体结肠镜医师的腺瘤检出率,我们旨在量化术前了解阳性(+)多靶点粪便 DNA(mt-sDNA)对结肠镜质量指标的影响。

方法

我们回顾性地确定了进行大量+mt-sDNA 结肠镜检查的医生;记录了 post-mt-sDNA 结肠镜检查后的结直肠腺瘤。根据基线腺瘤检出率,将这些结肠镜医师分为四分位组。比较各四分位组基线结肠镜腺瘤检出率和无蒂锯齿状病变检出率与 post-mt-sDNA 结肠镜检查后腺瘤诊断率。从阴性检查中测量退出时间。

结果

在研究期间(2014-17 年),评估了 post-mt-sDNA 结肠镜检查量最高的四分位组的医生。在 35 名胃肠病学家中,他们的中位筛查结肠镜腺瘤检出率为 32%(IQR,28-39%),锯齿状病变检出率为 13%(8-15%)。在+mt-sDNA 后,腺瘤诊断率增加到 47%(36-56%),锯齿状病变诊断率增加到 31%(17-42%)(均 p<0.0001)。退出时间中位数从 10(7-13)增加到 12(10-17)分钟(p<0.0001),并且与四分位组成比例。在+mt-sDNA 后,基线检测值较低的女性患者腺瘤诊断率与男性患者相比不成比例地升高(p=0.048),所有患者的锯齿状肿瘤诊断率也升高(p=0.0092)。

结论

与平均风险筛查检查相比,+mt-sDNA 的知识丰富了腺瘤的诊断。腺瘤和锯齿状病变的诊断在那些腺瘤检出率较低的患者中放大。对 mt-sDNA 结果的认识可能会增加医生在结肠镜检查过程中的注意力。在术前了解阳性 mt-sDNA 检测结果可提高基线腺瘤检出率较低的结肠镜医师的腺瘤检出率,而与退出时间无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8a1/10882559/a4f0dcfd0479/nihms-1963540-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8a1/10882559/b2bbbb7433ad/nihms-1963540-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8a1/10882559/bbd9a49abf6a/nihms-1963540-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8a1/10882559/351a9fc91e19/nihms-1963540-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8a1/10882559/eae5ae347694/nihms-1963540-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8a1/10882559/a4f0dcfd0479/nihms-1963540-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8a1/10882559/b2bbbb7433ad/nihms-1963540-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8a1/10882559/bbd9a49abf6a/nihms-1963540-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8a1/10882559/351a9fc91e19/nihms-1963540-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8a1/10882559/eae5ae347694/nihms-1963540-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8a1/10882559/a4f0dcfd0479/nihms-1963540-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Neoplasia Diagnosis After Multi-target Stool DNA Is Enhanced Among Lowest Baseline Detectors.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测后,最低基线检测者的肿瘤诊断能力得到增强。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Sep;68(9):3721-3731. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08038-5. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
Detection of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasia by Multi-target Stool DNA.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测用于结直肠腺瘤及癌的筛查
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 18;12(6):e00375. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000375.
3
Colonoscopy Findings in FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ Patients versus in Colonoscopy-only Patients: New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Data.FIT+ 和 mt-sDNA+ 患者与结肠镜检查仅患者的结肠镜检查结果:新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记数据。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2022 Jul 5;15(7):455-464. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0581.
4
Evaluation of Patients with an Apparent False Positive Stool DNA Test: The Role of Repeat Stool DNA Testing.评估粪便 DNA 检测呈明显假阳性的患者:重复粪便 DNA 检测的作用。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jun;63(6):1449-1453. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5001-z. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
5
Multitarget stool DNA test: clinical performance and impact on yield and quality of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.多靶点粪便DNA检测:用于结直肠癌筛查的结肠镜检查的临床性能及其对产量和质量的影响
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar;85(3):657-665.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.012. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
Multitarget stool DNA tests increases colorectal cancer screening among previously noncompliant Medicare patients.多靶点粪便DNA检测增加了既往不依从的医疗保险患者的结直肠癌筛查率。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 21;23(3):464-471. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i3.464.
7
Serrated Polyp Yield at Colonoscopy in Patients with Positive FIT, Positive mt-sDNA, and Colonoscopy Only: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.在接受 FIT 阳性、mt-sDNA 阳性和仅结肠镜检查的患者中,结肠镜检查对锯齿状息肉的检出率:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Feb 6;32(2):226-232. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0527.
8
Influence of Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors on Predictive Value of a Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Test.结直肠癌危险因素对粪便多靶点 DNA 检测阳性预测值的影响。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024;58(5):471-474. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001884. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
9
Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals With Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Tests: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测阳性个体的结直肠肿瘤检测:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022;56(5):419-425. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001554.
10
Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes.基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查和阳性检测后结肠镜检查中患者依从性对临床结局的影响。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Sep;14(9):845-850. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0075. Epub 2021 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Oral Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Agents on Performance of Multitarget Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.口服抗凝剂和抗血小板药物对多靶点结直肠癌筛查试验结果的影响。
Gastro Hep Adv. 2025 Jan 3;4(4):100610. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.100610. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Serrated Polyp Yield at Colonoscopy in Patients with Positive FIT, Positive mt-sDNA, and Colonoscopy Only: Data from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.在接受 FIT 阳性、mt-sDNA 阳性和仅结肠镜检查的患者中,结肠镜检查对锯齿状息肉的检出率:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Feb 6;32(2):226-232. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0527.
2
Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: a population-based study.锯齿状息肉检测与结肠镜检查后结直肠癌间隔期风险:基于人群的研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Aug;7(8):747-754. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00090-5. Epub 2022 May 9.
3
Colonoscopy Findings in FIT+ and mt-sDNA+ Patients versus in Colonoscopy-only Patients: New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry Data.
FIT+ 和 mt-sDNA+ 患者与结肠镜检查仅患者的结肠镜检查结果:新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记数据。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2022 Jul 5;15(7):455-464. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0581.
4
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
5
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
6
Efficacy of repeat forward-view examination of the right-sided colon during colonoscopy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.结肠镜检查时重复观察右侧结肠的效果:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;35(10):1746-1752. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15064. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
7
Multitarget Stool DNA Screening in Clinical Practice: High Positive Predictive Value for Colorectal Neoplasia Regardless of Exposure to Previous Colonoscopy.临床实践中的多靶点粪便 DNA 筛查:无论是否曾接受过结肠镜检查,对结直肠肿瘤均具有较高的阳性预测值。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr;115(4):608-615. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000546.
8
Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结肠镜检查和息肉切除术后的随访建议:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组的共识更新
Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;115(3):415-434. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000544.
9
Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population.多靶点粪便 DNA 检测在一般风险结直肠癌筛查人群中的性能。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;114(12):1909-1918. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000445.
10
Adenoma detection rates in colonoscopies for positive fecal immunochemical tests versus direct screening colonoscopies.粪便免疫化学检测阳性的结肠镜检查与直接筛查结肠镜检查的腺瘤检出率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):607-613.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 16.