Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022;56(5):419-425. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001554.
The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) includes multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) testing as a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening option in average-risk individuals, but data on colonoscopy outcomes after positive mt-sDNA tests in community settings are needed.
The aim of this study was to investigate colonoscopy outcomes and quality following positive mt-sDNA in the population-based New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
We compared colonoscopy outcomes and quality between age-matched, sex-matched, and risk-matched patients from 30 endoscopy practices with and without a preceding positive mt-sDNA test. Main outcomes were colonoscopy findings of CRC, advanced noncancerous neoplasia, nonadvanced neoplasia, or normal examination. Quality measures included withdrawal time, bowel preparation quality, examination completion, and percentage of average-risk individuals with normal colonoscopies receiving a USPSTF-recommended 10 year rescreening interval.
Individuals with positive mt-sDNA tests (N=306, average age 67.0 y; 61.8% female) were significantly more likely than colonoscopy-only patients (N=918, 66.2 y; 61.8% female) to have CRC (1.3% vs. 0.4%) or advanced noncancerous neoplasia (27.1% vs. 8.2%) (P<0.0001). Neoplasia was found in 68.0% of patients having colonoscopy after a positive mt-sDNA test, (positive predictive value, was 68.0%), versus 42.3% of patients with colonoscopy only (P<0.0001). No significant differences in colonoscopy quality measures were observed between cohorts.
Colonoscopy after a positive mt-sDNA test was more frequently associated with CRC and colorectal neoplasia than colonoscopy alone. Positive mt-sDNA tests can enrich the proportion of colonoscopies with clinically relevant findings. Follow-up recommendations suggest that endoscopists do not inappropriately shorten rescreening intervals in mt-sDNA-positive patients with normal colonoscopy. These findings support the clinical utility of mt-sDNA for CRC screening in community practice.
美国预防服务工作组 (USPSTF) 将多靶点粪便 DNA (mt-sDNA) 检测作为一种结直肠癌 (CRC) 筛查选择纳入平均风险人群,但需要了解社区环境中 mt-sDNA 检测阳性后的结肠镜检查结果。
本研究旨在调查基于人群的新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处中 mt-sDNA 阳性后的结肠镜检查结果和质量。
我们比较了 30 家内镜检查机构中年龄、性别和风险匹配的患者,比较了有和没有 mt-sDNA 检测阳性史的患者的结肠镜检查结果和质量。主要结局是 CRC、高级非癌性肿瘤、非高级肿瘤或正常检查的结肠镜检查发现。质量测量包括退出时间、肠道准备质量、检查完成情况以及接受 USPSTF 推荐的 10 年复查间隔的平均风险个体的百分比。
mt-sDNA 检测阳性的个体(N=306,平均年龄 67.0 岁;61.8%女性)比结肠镜检查仅患者(N=918,66.2 岁;61.8%女性)更有可能患有 CRC(1.3%比 0.4%)或高级非癌性肿瘤(27.1%比 8.2%)(P<0.0001)。在 mt-sDNA 检测阳性后的结肠镜检查中,68.0%的患者发现了肿瘤(阳性预测值为 68.0%),而仅结肠镜检查的患者中,42.3%的患者发现了肿瘤(P<0.0001)。两组间的结肠镜检查质量指标无显著差异。
与单独结肠镜检查相比,mt-sDNA 检测阳性后的结肠镜检查更常与 CRC 和结直肠肿瘤相关。阳性 mt-sDNA 检测可增加具有临床相关发现的结肠镜检查比例。随访建议表明,内镜医生不应不恰当地缩短 mt-sDNA 阳性且结肠镜检查正常患者的复查间隔。这些发现支持 mt-sDNA 在社区实践中用于 CRC 筛查的临床效用。