Institute for Sustainable Chemistry, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Universitätsallee 1, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(39):91492-91500. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28528-3. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
Organosiloxanes are industrially produced worldwide in millions of tons per annum and are widely used by industry, professionals, and consumers. Some of these compounds are PBT (persistent, biaccumulative and toxic) or vPvB (very persistent and very bioaccumulative). If organosiloxanes react at all in the environment, Si-O bonds are hydrolyzed or Si-C bonds are oxidatively cleaved, to result finally in silica and carbon dioxide. In strong contrast and very unexpectedly, recently formation of new Si-CH bonds from siloxanes and methane by the action of microorganisms under mild ambient conditions was proposed (in landfills or digesters) and even reported (in a biotrickling filter, 30 °C). This is very surprising in view of the harsh conditions required in industrial Si-CH synthesis. Here, we scrutinized the pertinent papers, with the result that evidence put forward for Si-C bond formation from siloxanes and methane in technical microbiological systems is invalid, suggesting such reactions will not occur in the environment where they are even less favored by conditions. The claim of such reactions followed from erroneous calculations and misinterpretation of experimental results. We propose an alternative explanation of the experimental observations, i.e., the putative observation of such reactions was presumably due to confusion of two compounds, hexamethyldisiloxane and dimethylsilanediol, that elute at similar retention times from standard GC columns.
有机硅氧烷在全球范围内每年以百万吨计生产,被工业界、专业人士和消费者广泛使用。其中一些化合物是持久性、生物蓄积性和毒性物质(PBT)或高持久性、高生物蓄积性物质(vPvB)。如果有机硅氧烷在环境中发生反应,Si-O 键会水解,Si-C 键会被氧化断裂,最终形成二氧化硅和二氧化碳。相比之下,最近有研究提出(在垃圾填埋场或消化池中),甚至有报道称(在生物滴滤器中,30°C),在温和的环境条件下,微生物作用下可从硅氧烷和甲烷生成新的 Si-CH 键。鉴于工业 Si-CH 合成所需的苛刻条件,这是非常令人惊讶的。在此,我们仔细研究了相关论文,结果表明,在技术微生物系统中,从硅氧烷和甲烷形成 Si-C 键的证据是无效的,这表明在环境中它们的反应不会发生,因为环境条件对它们更不利。这种反应的说法源于错误的计算和对实验结果的错误解释。我们提出了对实验观察结果的替代解释,即推测观察到的这种反应可能是由于两种化合物(六甲基二硅氧烷和二甲基硅二醇)的混淆,这两种化合物在标准 GC 柱上的保留时间相似。