• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄:荟萃分析和系统评价。

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis: Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 15;203:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.120. Epub 2023 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.120
PMID:37487404
Abstract

Because of its anatomic and procedural complexities, bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) has been excluded from previous trials investigating transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of TAVR in BAV and tricuspid aortic valve patients. We searched the databases systematically from inception until March 2023 for studies that reported the outcomes of TAVR in BAV and tricuspid aortic valve patients. The primary focus was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Additional outcomes included outcomes at 30-day follow-up. Secondary and subgroup analyses were performed on propensity-matched patients, patients at low surgical risk, and based on the type of transcatheter valve type. We included 30 studies with a total of 193,274 patients who underwent TAVR, of which 14,353 patients had BAV stenosis. The rate of 1-year mortality was lower in the BAV group compared with the tricuspid group with the results reaching statistical significance (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75 to 0.98, p = 0.02). The rate of 30-day stroke, however, was higher in patients with BAV who underwent TAVR (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.43, p <0.05). Other 30-day clinical outcomes were similar between the 2 groups. Similar outcomes were observed in secondary analysis of matched populations with less mortality and higher rate of stroke in patients with BAV (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.96, p = 0.01, and OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.75, p <0.05, respectively). Comparing the outcomes for self-expandable and balloon-expandable valves resulted in similar results. Subgroup analysis of low-surgical-risk patients similarly showed lower 1-year mortality in patients with BAV (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.91, p = 0.01), without difference in 30-day stroke between the 2 groups (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.88, p = 0.30). In conclusion, this report indicates that TAVR is safe and feasible in patients with BAV, including patients at low surgical risk. The higher rate of 30-day stroke, however, warrants caution when pursuing TAVR in this population. More studies, specifically randomized trials, are still warranted to further assess the safety and the long-term outcomes in this group.

摘要

由于解剖和程序上的复杂性,二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)已被排除在前瞻性经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)研究之外。我们旨在比较 TAVR 在 BAV 和三叶式主动脉瓣患者中的临床结果。我们从成立之初到 2023 年 3 月系统地搜索了数据库,以寻找报告 TAVR 在 BAV 和三叶式主动脉瓣患者中结果的研究。主要重点是 1 年时的全因死亡率。其他结果包括 30 天随访时的结果。对倾向匹配患者、低手术风险患者以及基于经导管瓣膜类型进行了二次和亚组分析。我们纳入了 30 项研究,共有 193274 例患者接受了 TAVR,其中 14353 例患者有 BAV 狭窄。BAV 组的 1 年死亡率低于三叶式组,结果具有统计学意义(比值比 [OR] 0.86,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.75 至 0.98,p = 0.02)。然而,BAV 患者 TAVR 后 30 天的卒中发生率更高(OR 1.24,95%CI 1.08 至 1.43,p <0.05)。两组其他 30 天临床结果相似。在匹配人群的二次分析中也观察到了相似的结果,BAV 患者的死亡率较低,卒中发生率较高(OR 0.84,95%CI 0.72 至 0.96,p = 0.01,和 OR 1.38,95%CI 1.09 至 1.75,p <0.05,分别)。比较自膨式和球囊扩张式瓣膜的结果得出了相似的结果。低手术风险患者的亚组分析同样表明 BAV 患者 1 年死亡率较低(OR 0.67,95%CI 0.50 至 0.91,p = 0.01),两组 30 天卒中发生率无差异(OR 1.24,95%CI 0.83 至 1.88,p = 0.30)。总之,本报告表明 TAVR 在 BAV 患者中是安全可行的,包括低手术风险患者。然而,较高的 30 天卒中发生率在该人群中进行 TAVR 时需要谨慎。仍需要更多的研究,特别是随机试验,以进一步评估该组的安全性和长期结果。

相似文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis: Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 15;203:105-112. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.120. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
2
Comparing outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with stenotic bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗狭窄二叶式和三叶式主动脉瓣患者的预后比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Jul;41(7):896-902. doi: 10.1002/clc.22992. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
3
Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis and Mortality or Stroke Among Patients at Low Surgical Risk.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣 vs 三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄与低手术风险患者的死亡率或卒中的关系。
JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1034-1044. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13346.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis with first- and new-generation bioprostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶主动脉瓣狭窄的第一代和第二代生物瓣:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jan 1;298:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
5
Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis and Mortality or Stroke.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄与死亡率或卒中性事件的相关性。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2193-2202. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7108.
6
Predictors of conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with balloon-expandable valve for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄后传导障碍的预测因素。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jul;33(7):1576-1586. doi: 10.1111/jce.15525. Epub 2022 May 22.
7
Clinical outcomes of bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable valves.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用自膨式瓣膜治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的临床结局。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02943-9.
8
Clinical outcomes and the impact of valve morphology for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valves: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣的临床转归和瓣膜形态学的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Oct;102(4):721-730. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30808. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
9
Comparison of procedural, clinical and valve performance results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者的手术过程、临床和瓣膜性能结果比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;254:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
10
Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Anatomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在二叶瓣与三叶瓣解剖结构中的结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct 11;14(19):2144-2155. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.052.

引用本文的文献

1
Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Sudden Cardiac Death.二叶式主动脉瓣与心源性猝死
Life (Basel). 2025 May 28;15(6):868. doi: 10.3390/life15060868.
2
Thrombogenic Risk Assessment of Transcatheter Prosthetic Heart Valves Using a Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach.基于流固耦合方法的经导管人工心脏瓣膜血栓形成风险评估
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Dec;257:108469. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108469. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Thrombogenic Risk Assessment of Transcatheter Prosthetic Heart Valves Using a Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach.
基于流固相互作用方法的经导管人工心脏瓣膜血栓形成风险评估
ArXiv. 2024 Jun 18:arXiv:2406.12156v1.
4
A Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes of TAVR versus SAVR in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis and TAVR Results in Different Bicuspid Valve Anatomies.二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄中经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)短期结局的荟萃分析以及不同二叶式瓣膜解剖结构的TAVR结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 28;12(23):7371. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237371.