• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习对与患者伤害赔偿索赔相关的精神科数据进行分类。

Machine Learning Classification of Psychiatric Data Associated with Compensation Claims for Patient Injuries.

机构信息

Faculty of Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 2023 Dec;62(5-06):174-182. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771378. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1771378
PMID:37487538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10878742/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adverse events are common in health care. In psychiatric treatment, compensation claims for patient injuries appear to be less common than in other medical specialties. The most common types of patient injury claims in psychiatry include diagnostic flaws, unprevented suicide, or coercive treatment deemed as unnecessary or harmful.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to study whether it is possible to form different categories of patient injury types associated with the psychiatric evaluations of compensation claims and to base machine learning classification on these categories. Further, the binary classification of positive and negative decisions for compensation claims was the other objective.

METHODS

Finnish psychiatric specialist evaluations for the compensation claims of patient injuries were classified into six different categories called classes applying the machine learning methods of artificial intelligence. In addition, another classification of the same data into two classes was performed to test whether it was possible to classify data cases according to their known decisions, either accepted or declined compensation claim.

RESULTS

The former classification task produced relatively good classification results subject to separating between different classes. Instead, the latter was more complex. However, classification accuracies of both tasks could be improved by using the generation of artificial data cases in the preprocessing phase before classifications. This preprocessing improved the classification accuracy of six classes up to 88% when the method of random forests was used for classification and that of the binary classification to 89%.

CONCLUSION

The results show that the objectives defined were possible to solve reasonably.

摘要

背景

不良事件在医疗保健中很常见。在精神科治疗中,与其他医学专业相比,患者受伤的赔偿索赔似乎较少。精神科患者伤害索赔中最常见的类型包括诊断缺陷、无法预防的自杀或被视为不必要或有害的强制性治疗。

目的

目的是研究是否可以根据赔偿索赔的精神科评估形成与患者伤害类型相关的不同类别,并基于这些类别进行机器学习分类。此外,赔偿索赔的阳性和阴性决定的二进制分类是另一个目标。

方法

应用人工智能的机器学习方法将芬兰精神科专家对患者伤害赔偿索赔的评估分为六个不同类别,称为类别。此外,对相同数据进行了另一种分类,分为两类,以测试是否可以根据其已知决定,即接受或拒绝赔偿索赔,对数据案例进行分类。

结果

前者的分类任务在分离不同类别方面产生了相对较好的分类结果。相比之下,后者则更加复杂。然而,通过在分类之前的预处理阶段生成人工数据案例,可以提高这两个任务的分类准确性。这种预处理方法将随机森林分类法的六类分类准确率提高到 88%,将二进制分类的准确率提高到 89%。

结论

结果表明,定义的目标是可以合理解决的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b3/10878742/f20614b4fd61/10-1055-s-0043-1771378-i22010042-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b3/10878742/d4e41db64a26/10-1055-s-0043-1771378-i22010042-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b3/10878742/f20614b4fd61/10-1055-s-0043-1771378-i22010042-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b3/10878742/d4e41db64a26/10-1055-s-0043-1771378-i22010042-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84b3/10878742/f20614b4fd61/10-1055-s-0043-1771378-i22010042-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Classification of Psychiatric Data Associated with Compensation Claims for Patient Injuries.机器学习对与患者伤害赔偿索赔相关的精神科数据进行分类。
Methods Inf Med. 2023 Dec;62(5-06):174-182. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771378. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
What can we learn about the psychiatric diagnostic categories by analysing patients' lived experiences with Machine-Learning?通过分析患者的生活经历,我们可以从机器学习中学到哪些关于精神科诊断类别的知识?
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 24;22(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03984-2.
3
Dental treatment injuries in the Finnish Patient Insurance Centre in 2000-2011.2000 - 2011年芬兰患者保险中心的牙科治疗损伤情况
Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(3):236-40. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2015.1103898. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
4
Detecting Potentially Harmful and Protective Suicide-Related Content on Twitter: Machine Learning Approach.在 Twitter 上检测潜在有害和保护自杀相关内容:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 17;24(8):e34705. doi: 10.2196/34705.
5
Pediatric Injury Surveillance From Uncoded Emergency Department Admission Records in Italy: Machine Learning-Based Text-Mining Approach.意大利基于无编码急诊入院记录的儿科伤害监测:基于机器学习的文本挖掘方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jul 12;9:e44467. doi: 10.2196/44467.
6
Compensated and non-compensated patient injury claims in internal carotid artery interventions in Finland, 2004-2017.2004-2017 年芬兰颈内动脉介入治疗中补偿和非补偿患者伤害索赔。
Vascular. 2023 Jun;31(3):544-550. doi: 10.1177/17085381211069294. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
7
Investigating errors in medical imaging: medical malpractice cases in Finland.调查医学成像中的错误:芬兰的医疗事故案例
Insights Imaging. 2021 Jun 28;12(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01011-8.
8
Injuries as a result of treatment of tibial fractures in children: Claims for compensation submitted to the Patient Insurance Center in Finland.儿童胫骨骨折治疗导致的损伤:向芬兰患者保险中心提交的赔偿申请。
Acta Orthop. 2009 Feb;80(1):78-82. doi: 10.1080/17453670902805080.
9
Knocking at the wrong door: insured workers' inadequate psychiatric care and workers' compensation claims.敲错门:参保工人的精神科护理不足与工伤赔偿申请
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007 Jul-Oct;30(4-5):416-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
10
Patient and hospital characteristics associated with claims and compensations for patient injuries in coronary artery bypass grafting in Finland.芬兰冠状动脉搭桥手术中与患者损伤索赔及赔偿相关的患者和医院特征。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009 Jul;14(3):150-5. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008084.

本文引用的文献

1
Analyzing Workers' Compensation Claims and Payments Made Using Data from a Large Insurance Provider.利用大型保险提供商的数据来分析工人赔偿索赔和支付情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 30;17(19):7157. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197157.
2
Adverse events in psychiatry: a national cohort study in Sweden with a unique psychiatric trigger tool.精神病学中的不良事件:瑞典一项具有独特精神科触发工具的全国队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2447-2.
3
Patient injuries in pediatric otorhinolaryngology.小儿耳鼻咽喉科的患者损伤
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;120:36-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
4
Combination of Genetic Variation and G72 Protein Level to Detect Schizophrenia: Machine Learning Approaches.基因变异与G72蛋白水平相结合用于检测精神分裂症:机器学习方法
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 6;9:566. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00566. eCollection 2018.
5
Malpractice risk at the physician level: Claim-prone physicians.医生层面的医疗事故风险:易引发索赔的医生。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2018 Aug;58:152-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
6
Root Canal Irrigants and Medicaments in Endodontic Malpractice Cases: A Nationwide Longitudinal Observation.根管冲洗剂和药物在牙髓病学医疗事故案例中的应用:一项全国性纵向观察。
J Endod. 2018 Apr;44(4):559-564. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
7
Safety of Psychiatric Inpatients at the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人事务部精神病住院患者的安全性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Feb 1;69(2):204-210. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700224. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
8
Compensation Research Database: population-based injury data for surveillance, linkage and mining.补偿研究数据库:用于监测、关联和挖掘的基于人群的伤害数据。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Oct 1;9(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2255-4.
9
An Analysis of the Number of Medical Malpractice Claims and Their Amounts.医疗事故索赔数量及其金额分析。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 14;11(4):e0153362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153362. eCollection 2016.
10
Cross-trial prediction of treatment outcome in depression: a machine learning approach.抑郁症治疗结果的跨试验预测:一种机器学习方法。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;3(3):243-50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00471-X. Epub 2016 Jan 21.