• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病学中的不良事件:瑞典一项具有独特精神科触发工具的全国队列研究。

Adverse events in psychiatry: a national cohort study in Sweden with a unique psychiatric trigger tool.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital, 583 81, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2447-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-020-2447-2
PMID:32019518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7001519/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The vast majority of patient safety research has focused on somatic health care. Although specific adverse events (AEs) within psychiatric healthcare have been explored, the overall level and nature of AEs is sparsely investigated.

METHODS

Cohort study using a retrospective record review based on a two-step trigger tool methodology in the charts of randomly selected patients 18 years or older admitted to the psychiatric acute care departments in all Swedish regions from January 1 to June 30, 2017. Hospital care together with corresponding outpatient care were reviewed as a continuum, over a maximum of 3 months. The AEs were categorised according to type, severity and preventability.

RESULTS

In total, the medical records of 2552 patients were reviewed. Among the patients, 50.4% were women and 49.6% were men. The median (range) age was 44 (18-97) years for women and 44.5 (18-93) years for men. In 438 of the reviewed records, 720 AEs were identified, corresponding to the AEs identified in 17.2% [95% confidence interval, 15.7-18.6] of the records. The majority of AEs resulted in less or moderate harm, and 46.2% were considered preventable. Prolonged disease progression and deliberate self-harm were the most common types of AEs. AEs were significantly more common in women (21.5%) than in men (12.7%) but showed no difference between age groups. Severe or catastrophic harm was found in 2.3% of the records, and the majority affected were women (61%). Triggers pointing at deficient quality of care were found in 78% of the records, with the absence of a treatment plan being the most common.

CONCLUSIONS

AEs are common in psychiatric care. Aside from further patient safety work, systematic interventions are also warranted to improve the quality of psychiatric care.

摘要

背景

绝大多数患者安全研究都集中在躯体保健上。虽然已经探讨了精神保健中特定的不良事件(AE),但 AE 的总体水平和性质仍鲜有研究。

方法

这是一项队列研究,使用回顾性记录审查,基于两步触发工具方法,对 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日期间在瑞典所有地区的精神科急症病房随机选择的 18 岁或以上患者的图表进行分析。审查了医院护理和相应的门诊护理,时间最长为 3 个月。根据类型、严重程度和可预防程度对 AE 进行分类。

结果

总共审查了 2552 名患者的病历。患者中,50.4%为女性,49.6%为男性。女性的中位(范围)年龄为 44(18-97)岁,男性为 44.5(18-93)岁。在审查的 438 份记录中,发现了 720 起 AE,占记录中 17.2%(95%置信区间,15.7-18.6)的 AE。大多数 AE 导致的伤害程度较轻或为中度,46.2%可预防。疾病进展延长和故意自残是最常见的 AE 类型。女性(21.5%)AE 发生率明显高于男性(12.7%),但不同年龄组之间无差异。在 2.3%的记录中发现了严重或灾难性的伤害,大多数受影响者为女性(61%)。在 78%的记录中发现了指向护理质量不足的触发因素,其中最常见的是缺乏治疗计划。

结论

AE 在精神保健中很常见。除了进一步的患者安全工作外,还需要系统干预来提高精神保健的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca3/7001519/0c3b42e4b161/12888_2020_2447_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca3/7001519/0c3b42e4b161/12888_2020_2447_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eca3/7001519/0c3b42e4b161/12888_2020_2447_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adverse events in psychiatry: a national cohort study in Sweden with a unique psychiatric trigger tool.精神病学中的不良事件:瑞典一项具有独特精神科触发工具的全国队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2447-2.
2
Incidence of adverse events in Sweden during 2013-2016: a cohort study describing the implementation of a national trigger tool.2013 - 2016年瑞典不良事件的发生率:一项描述国家触发工具实施情况的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e020833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020833.
3
Adverse events in patients in home healthcare: a retrospective record review using trigger tool methodology.居家医疗患者的不良事件:使用触发工具方法进行的回顾性记录审查
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 3;8(1):e019267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019267.
4
Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and no-harm incidents that affect patients admitted to home healthcare.开发一种触发工具,以识别影响到接受家庭医疗保健患者的不良事件和无伤害事件。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Jul;27(7):502-511. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006755. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
5
Developing a research tool to detect iatrogenic adverse events in psychiatric health care by involving service users and health professionals.开发一种研究工具,通过让服务使用者和卫生专业人员参与,来检测精神卫生保健中的医源性不良事件。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):405-416. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12994. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events.验证触发因素并开发用于识别不良事件的儿科触发工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 21;14:655. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0655-5.
7
Adverse events in orthopedic care identified via the Global Trigger Tool in Sweden - implications on preventable prolonged hospitalizations.通过瑞典全球触发工具识别的骨科护理不良事件——对可预防的长期住院的影响
Patient Saf Surg. 2016 Oct 26;10:23. doi: 10.1186/s13037-016-0112-y. eCollection 2016.
8
An adverse event trigger tool in dentistry: a new methodology for measuring harm in the dental office.牙科不良事件触发工具:一种测量牙科诊所伤害的新方法。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Jul;144(7):808-14. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0191.
9
Preventable and mitigable adverse events in cancer care: Measuring risk and harm across the continuum.癌症护理中可预防和可减轻的不良事件:衡量整个连续过程中的风险和危害。
Cancer. 2017 Dec 1;123(23):4728-4736. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30916. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
10
Mitigating risk in Norwegian psychiatric care: Identifying triggers of adverse events through Global Trigger Tool for psychiatric care.降低挪威精神科护理中的风险:通过精神科护理全球触发工具识别不良事件的触发因素。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2019;30(4):203-216. doi: 10.3233/JRS-190064.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Prescription Patterns of Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia Patients-A Single-Center Prospective Study.精神分裂症患者抗精神病药物处方模式评估——一项单中心前瞻性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 24;14(9):2941. doi: 10.3390/jcm14092941.
2
Prevalence and solving strategies of drug-related problems in adult psychiatric inpatients - a systematic review.成年精神科住院患者药物相关问题的患病率及解决策略——一项系统综述
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 4;15:1460098. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1460098. eCollection 2024.
3
Machine Learning Classification of Psychiatric Data Associated with Compensation Claims for Patient Injuries.

本文引用的文献

1
The Mental Health Trigger Tool: Development and Testing of a Specialized Trigger Tool for Mental Health Settings.心理健康触发工具:心理健康环境专用触发工具的开发和测试。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Jun 1;17(4):e360-e366. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000606.
2
Incidence of cardiovascular diseases and type-2-diabetes mellitus in patients with psychiatric disorders.精神障碍患者心血管疾病和2型糖尿病的发病率。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;72(7):455-461. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1463392. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
3
Patient Safety In Inpatient Psychiatry: A Remaining Frontier For Health Policy.
机器学习对与患者伤害赔偿索赔相关的精神科数据进行分类。
Methods Inf Med. 2023 Dec;62(5-06):174-182. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771378. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
Incidence and characteristics of adverse events in paediatric inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿科住院患者不良事件的发生率和特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):133-149. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015298. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
5
Patient Safety and Mental Health-A Growing Quality Gap in Canada.患者安全与精神健康:加拿大日益扩大的质量差距。
Can J Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;67(4):246-249. doi: 10.1177/07067437211036596. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
住院精神病患者的安全:卫生政策的一个待开拓领域。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1853-1861. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0718.
4
Sex differences in antidepressant efficacy.抗抑郁药疗效的性别差异。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Jan;44(1):140-154. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0156-z. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
Incidence of adverse events in Sweden during 2013-2016: a cohort study describing the implementation of a national trigger tool.2013 - 2016年瑞典不良事件的发生率:一项描述国家触发工具实施情况的队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 30;8(3):e020833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020833.
6
Adverse events in patients in home healthcare: a retrospective record review using trigger tool methodology.居家医疗患者的不良事件:使用触发工具方法进行的回顾性记录审查
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 3;8(1):e019267. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019267.
7
Safety of Psychiatric Inpatients at the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人事务部精神病住院患者的安全性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Feb 1;69(2):204-210. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700224. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
8
Frequency and Nature of Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events in Mental Health Hospitals: a Systematic Review.精神卫生医院用药错误及药物不良事件的发生率与性质:一项系统综述
Drug Saf. 2017 Oct;40(10):871-886. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0557-7.
9
Prevalence and risk factors for HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C in people with severe mental illness: a total population study of Sweden.严重精神疾病患者中艾滋病毒、乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎的患病率及危险因素:瑞典的一项全人群研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;4(9):685-693. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30253-5. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
10
A National Study of Patient Safety Culture in Hospitals in Sweden.瑞典全国医院患者安全文化研究。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Dec;15(4):328-333. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000369.