Suppr超能文献

应用 z 评分法选择超声胎儿头围标准。

Selection of Standards for Sonographic Fetal Head Circumference by Use of z-Scores.

机构信息

Pediatrix Center for Research, Education, Quality and Safety, Pediatrix Medical Group, Sunrise, Florida.

Obstetrix of San Jose, Campbell, California.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e2625-e2635. doi: 10.1055/a-2135-6838. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate which of five established norms should be used for sonographic assessment of fetal head circumference (HC).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study using pooled data from four maternal-fetal medicine practices. Inclusion criteria were singleton fetus, gestational age 22 to 39 weeks, biometry measured, and fetal cardiac activity present. Five norms of HC were studied: Jeanty et al, Hadlock et al, the INTERGROWTH-21st Project (IG-21st), the World Health Organization Fetal Growth Curves (WHO), and the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies unified standard (NICHD-U). The fit of our HC measurements to each norm was assessed by these criteria: mean -score close to 0, standard deviation (SD) of close to 1, low Kolmogorov-Smirnov D-statistic, high Youden J-statistic, close to 10% of exams >90th percentile, close to 10% of exams <10th percentile, and close to 2.28% of exams >2 SD below the mean.

RESULTS

In 23,565 ultrasound exams, our HC measurements had the best fit to the WHO standard (mean -score 0.10, SD of  = 1.01, D-statistic <0.01, J-statistic 0.83-0.94). The SD of the Jeanty reference was much larger than all the other norms and our measurements, resulting in underdiagnosis of abnormal HC. The means of the IG-21st and NICHD-U standards were smaller than the other norms and our measurements, resulting in underdiagnosis of small HC. The means of the Hadlock reference were larger than all the other norms and our measurements, resulting in overdiagnosis of small HC. Restricting the analysis to a low-risk subgroup of 4,423 exams without risk factors for large- or small-for-gestational age produced similar results.

CONCLUSION

The WHO standard is likely best for diagnosis of abnormal HC. The Jeanty (Chervenak) reference suggested by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine had poor sensitivity for microcephaly screening.

KEY POINTS

· There are >30 norms for fetal HC.. · It is unknown which norm should be used.. · The WHO standard fits our data best.. · The Chervenak reference is not sensitive for microcephaly..

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在评估胎儿头围(HC)时,应使用五个既定标准中的哪一个。

研究设计

使用来自四个母胎医学实践的汇总数据进行的横截面研究。纳入标准为单胎胎儿、孕龄 22 至 39 周、测量了生物测量值且有胎儿心脏活动。研究了五个 HC 标准:Jeanty 等人、Hadlock 等人、INTERGROWTH-21 项目(IG-21)、世界卫生组织胎儿生长曲线(WHO)和美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所胎儿生长研究统一标准(NICHD-U)。通过以下标准评估我们的 HC 测量值与每个标准的拟合程度:均值 - 得分接近 0,标准差(SD)接近 1,低 Kolmogorov-Smirnov D 统计量,高 Youden J 统计量,接近 10%的检查> 90 百分位,接近 10%的检查< 10 百分位,接近 2.28%的检查> 2SD 低于平均值。

结果

在 23565 次超声检查中,我们的 HC 测量值与 WHO 标准的拟合度最好(均值 - 得分 0.10,SD of = 1.01,D 统计量<0.01,J 统计量 0.83-0.94)。Jeanty 参考值的 SD 远大于所有其他标准和我们的测量值,导致 HC 异常的诊断不足。IG-21 标准和 NICHD-U 标准的平均值小于其他标准和我们的测量值,导致 HC 较小的诊断不足。Hadlock 参考值的平均值大于所有其他标准和我们的测量值,导致 HC 较小的过度诊断。将分析限制在无大或小胎儿生长受限风险因素的 4423 个低风险亚组中,也产生了类似的结果。

结论

WHO 标准可能最适合诊断 HC 异常。母胎医学学会建议的 Jeanty(Chervenak)参考值在小头畸形筛查方面灵敏度较差。

要点

· 有超过 30 个 HC 标准。· 尚不清楚应使用哪个标准。· WHO 标准最适合我们的数据。· Chervenak 参考值对小头畸形不敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验