• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与乳腺癌筛查不参与相关的因素:对 2016 年和 2019 年日本生活状况综合调查的分析。

Factors associated with non-participation in breast cancer screening: analysis of the 2016 and 2019 comprehensive survey of living conditions in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

Breast Cancer. 2023 Nov;30(6):952-964. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01486-x. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1007/s12282-023-01486-x
PMID:37488365
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The participation rate for breast cancer screening remains to be suboptimal in Japan. Therefore, it is important to identify factors associated with non-participation and identify people at high risk for non-participation.

METHODS

We carried out a cross-sectional study using the data of women aged 40-74 years from the 2016 and 2019 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions. We selected candidate predictor variables from the survey sheets and conducted a multivariable logistic regression for non-participation in breast cancer screening for the past 2 years. In addition, using data from 2016, we created an integer risk score for non-participation and tested its predictive performance in 2019.

RESULTS

The proportion of participants in breast cancer screening in 2016 and 2019 were 46.7% (50,177/107,513) and 48.7% (49,498/101,716), respectively. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, age over 50 years, single/divorced/widowed, lower education level, lower household expenditure, being insured for National Health Insurance, employed to small/middle scale company, non-regularly employed, current smoker, never/quit drinking or middle/high-risk drinking, lower self-rated health status, higher Kessler Psychological Distress Scale score, non-participation in the annual health checkups for diseases other than cancer, not constantly visiting hospitals/clinics showed a positive association with non-participation. The 9-item risk score (age, marital status, education, health insurance plan, employment, smoking, drinking, non-participation in the annual health checkups for diseases other than cancer, and not constantly visiting hospitals/clinics) and 3-item risk score (age, health insurance plan, non-participation in the annual health checkups for diseases other than cancer) showed the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.744 and 0.720, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We identified factors associated with non-participation in breast cancer screening. The simple risk score would be useful for public health sectors to identify people at risk for non-participation.

摘要

背景

在日本,乳腺癌筛查的参与率仍然不理想。因此,确定与不参与相关的因素并确定高风险人群非常重要。

方法

我们使用 2016 年和 2019 年生活条件综合调查中 40-74 岁女性的数据进行了横断面研究。我们从调查表格中选择候选预测变量,并对过去 2 年未参加乳腺癌筛查的情况进行多变量逻辑回归分析。此外,我们使用 2016 年的数据创建了不参与的整数风险评分,并在 2019 年测试了其预测性能。

结果

2016 年和 2019 年乳腺癌筛查的参与者比例分别为 46.7%(50177/107513)和 48.7%(49498/101716)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,年龄在 50 岁以上、单身/离婚/丧偶、教育程度较低、家庭支出较低、参加国民健康保险、在中小企业工作、非正规就业、当前吸烟者、从不/已戒烟或中度/高度饮酒、自评健康状况较差、Kessler 心理困扰量表评分较高、不参加除癌症以外的疾病年度健康检查、不经常去医院/诊所与不参加乳腺癌筛查呈正相关。9 项风险评分(年龄、婚姻状况、教育程度、健康保险计划、就业、吸烟、饮酒、不参加除癌症以外的疾病年度健康检查、不经常去医院/诊所)和 3 项风险评分(年龄、健康保险计划、不参加除癌症以外的疾病年度健康检查)的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.744 和 0.720。

结论

我们确定了与不参加乳腺癌筛查相关的因素。简单的风险评分将有助于公共卫生部门识别不参与的高风险人群。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with non-participation in breast cancer screening: analysis of the 2016 and 2019 comprehensive survey of living conditions in Japan.与乳腺癌筛查不参与相关的因素:对 2016 年和 2019 年日本生活状况综合调查的分析。
Breast Cancer. 2023 Nov;30(6):952-964. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01486-x. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
Analysis of Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening among Japanese Women using Nationally Representative Survey Data, 2001-2013.利用全国代表性调查数据对日本女性乳腺癌筛查预测因素的分析,2001-2013 年。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):171-178. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.1.171.
3
Association of employment and company size with lung cancer screening participation among Japanese based on the socioeconomic conditions using the Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions.基于社会经济状况的综合生活状况调查,分析日本就业状况和公司规模与肺癌筛查参与度的关系。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr;25(4):670-680. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01594-9. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
4
Combined patterns of participation in cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screenings and factors for non-participation in each screening among women in Japan.日本女性参与宫颈癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查的综合模式以及每个筛查项目未参与的因素。
Prev Med. 2021 Sep;150:106627. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106627. Epub 2021 May 18.
5
Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening participation among women in Japan, 2010-2019.2010-2019 年日本女性宫颈癌、乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查参与的社会经济不平等趋势。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;84:102353. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102353. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
6
Socio-demographic correlates of participation in mammography: a survey among women aged between 35- 69 in Tehran, Iran.参与乳房X光检查的社会人口统计学相关因素:伊朗德黑兰35至69岁女性的一项调查
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(6):2717-20. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.6.2717.
7
Association between serious psychological distress and nonparticipation in cancer screening and the modifying effect of socioeconomic status: Analysis of anonymized data from a national cross-sectional survey in Japan.严重心理困扰与癌症筛查不参与之间的关联及社会经济地位的调节作用:来自日本全国横断面调查匿名数据的分析。
Cancer. 2018 Feb 1;124(3):555-562. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31086. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
8
Breast cancer screening among women in Thailand: analyses of population-based household surveys.泰国女性的乳腺癌筛查:基于人群的家庭调查分析
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Nov;97(11):1106-18.
9
Negative impact of the COVID-19 state of emergency on breast cancer screening participation in Japan.新型冠状病毒肺炎紧急状态对日本乳腺癌筛查参与情况的负面影响。
Breast Cancer. 2021 Nov;28(6):1340-1345. doi: 10.1007/s12282-021-01272-7. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
10
Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.比较文化适应量表及其与老年墨西哥裔美国女性癌症筛查的关系。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995(18):41-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and associated factors of mammography uptake among the women aged 45 years and above: policy implications from the longitudinal ageing study in India wave I survey.45岁及以上女性乳腺钼靶检查的普及率及其相关因素:来自印度纵向老龄化研究第一轮调查的政策启示
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 19;25(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22261-x.
2
Change in Breast Cancer Screening Participation during COVID-19 Based on the 2019 and 2022 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions in Japan.基于2019年和2022年日本综合生活状况调查的新冠疫情期间乳腺癌筛查参与情况的变化
JMA J. 2025 Jan 15;8(1):183-190. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0234. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Noncommunicable Diseases in Japan Using a Newly Developed Administrative Claims Database Covering Young, Middle-aged, and Elderly People.利用新开发的涵盖年轻人、中年人和老年人的行政索赔数据库对日本非传染性疾病的患病率进行研究。
JMA J. 2022 Apr 15;5(2):190-198. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2021-0189. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
Abstaining from annual health check-ups is a predictor of advanced cancer diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study.**中文译文**:不参加年度健康检查是癌症晚期诊断的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2022;27:1. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.21-00292.
3
Cancer statistics, 2022.
The First Use of the Washington Group Short Set in a National Survey of Japan: Characteristics of the New Disability Measure in Comparison to an Existing Disability Measure.
华盛顿小组简表在日本全国性调查中的首次使用:与现有残疾衡量指标相比,新残疾衡量指标的特征
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 10;21(12):1643. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121643.
4
Relationship between health checkups and cancer screenings of wives and health checkups of their husbands: A cross-sectional study in Japan.妻子的健康检查与癌症筛查及其丈夫的健康检查之间的关系:日本的一项横断面研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Mar 23;41:102701. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102701. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Use of General Health Examination and Cancer Screening among People with Disability Who Need Support from Others: Analysis of the 2016 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions in Japan.需要他人支持的残疾人使用一般健康检查和癌症筛查的情况:基于 2016 年日本生活状况综合调查的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 13;21(2):219. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020219.
癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
4
Changes in breast cancer screening rates among 32 community health centers during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间 32 家社区卫生中心乳腺癌筛查率的变化。
Cancer. 2021 Dec 1;127(23):4512-4515. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33859. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
5
Factors associated with psychological distress in family caregivers: Findings from nationwide data in Japan.与家庭照料者心理困扰相关的因素:来自日本全国范围数据的结果。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021 Sep;21(9):855-864. doi: 10.1111/ggi.14250. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
6
Measuring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on organized cancer screening and diagnostic follow-up care in Ontario, Canada: A provincial, population-based study.测量 COVID-19 大流行对加拿大安大略省有组织的癌症筛查和诊断随访护理的影响:一项省级、基于人群的研究。
Prev Med. 2021 Oct;151:106586. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106586.
7
Racial disparities in routine health checkup and adherence to cancer screening guidelines among women in the United States of America.美国女性在常规健康检查和癌症筛查指南依从性方面的种族差异。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Nov;32(11):1247-1256. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01475-5. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
8
Relationship of attitudes toward uncertainty and preventive health behaviors with breast cancer screening participation.对不确定性的态度和预防保健行为与乳腺癌筛查参与的关系。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Apr 21;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01317-1.
9
Analysis of Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening among Japanese Women using Nationally Representative Survey Data, 2001-2013.利用全国代表性调查数据对日本女性乳腺癌筛查预测因素的分析,2001-2013 年。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):171-178. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.1.171.
10
Association of the National Health Guidance Intervention for Obesity and Cardiovascular Risks With Health Outcomes Among Japanese Men.国家健康指导干预对肥胖和心血管风险的影响与日本男性健康结果的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1630-1637. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4334.