• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村研究能力:研究成功的共创模式。

Rural research capacity: a co-created model for research success.

机构信息

Community Outreach and Engagement Program, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, United States of America.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jul 24;21(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01030-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-023-01030-5
PMID:37488533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10364434/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The United States' National Institutes of Health (NIH) have long challenged academia to improve clinical trial enrollment, especially in underrepresented populations; inclusive of geography, age, disability status, racial and ethnic minorities. It has been shown that rural and urban residents enrolled in clinical trials have similar outcomes, yet, rural healthcare systems struggle to provide opportunities to rural residents to participate in clinical trials when infrastructure is limited or unsupportive of research programs and/or research staffing levels are insufficient. To fully address the barriers to clinical trial access in rural areas, it is not adequate to simply open more trials. Community receptivity of research as well as organizational and community capacity must be considered. This project was determined by the Oregon Health and Science University's Institutional Review Board to be generalizable research across the chosen counties and was approved to operate under a waiver of written consent. Participants received a cash incentive in appreciation for their time and verbally agreed to participate after reviewing a project information sheet.

METHODS

The research team co-created a community-responsive approach to the receipt, review, and acceptance of clinical trials in a rural community setting. An adapted 5 step Implementation Mapping approach was used to develop a systematic strategy intended to increase the success, and therefore, the number of clinical trials offered in a rural community.

RESULTS

The research team and participating rural community members pilot-tested the implementation of a co-designed research review strategy, inclusive of a Regional Cultural Landscape and three co-created project submission and feasibility review forms, with a cancer early detection clinical trial. The proposed clinical trial required engagement from primary care and oncology. Utilizing the research review strategy demonstrated strong researcher-community stakeholder communication and negotiation, which resulted in early identification and resolution of potential barriers, hiring a local clinical research coordinator, and timely trial opening.

CONCLUSION

To the knowledge of the research team, the work described is the first to use a community-engaged approach for creating a clinical trial implementation strategy directly supportive of rural-sitting community stakeholders in receiving, reviewing, and approving cancer-related clinical trials in their community. Participating community members and leaders had the chance to negotiate research protocol changes or considerations directly with researchers interested in conducting a cancer clinical trial in their rural setting.

摘要

目的

美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)长期以来一直要求学术界提高临床试验的参与率,尤其是在代表性不足的人群中,包括地理、年龄、残疾状况、种族和少数民族。研究表明,参加临床试验的农村和城市居民的结果相似,但农村医疗系统在基础设施有限或不支持研究计划和/或研究人员配备水平不足的情况下,难以为农村居民提供参与临床试验的机会。为了充分解决农村地区参与临床试验的障碍,仅仅增加更多的试验是不够的。必须考虑研究的社区接受度以及组织和社区能力。俄勒冈健康与科学大学的机构审查委员会认为该项目具有所选县的推广研究价值,并批准在书面同意豁免的情况下开展项目。参与者在查看项目信息表后,获得了现金奖励以感谢他们的时间,并口头同意参与。

方法

研究团队共同制定了一种针对农村社区环境中接收、审查和接受临床试验的社区响应方法。采用经过改编的五步实施映射方法,制定了一项系统策略,旨在提高临床试验在农村社区中的成功率,从而增加提供的临床试验数量。

结果

研究团队和参与的农村社区成员试点测试了共同设计的研究审查策略的实施情况,包括区域文化景观和三个共同创建的项目提交和可行性审查表格,用于一项癌症早期检测临床试验。该拟议的临床试验需要初级保健和肿瘤学的参与。利用研究审查策略,展示了强大的研究人员与社区利益相关者的沟通和协商,这有助于及早识别和解决潜在障碍,聘请当地的临床研究协调员,并及时启动试验。

结论

据研究团队所知,所描述的工作是首次使用社区参与方法来创建一项临床试验实施策略,该策略直接支持农村社区利益相关者接收、审查和批准在其社区中进行的癌症相关临床试验。参与的社区成员和领导人有机会直接与有兴趣在其农村环境中开展癌症临床试验的研究人员协商研究方案的变更或考虑因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6077/10364434/e8a928839cf4/12961_2023_1030_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6077/10364434/0a565220542d/12961_2023_1030_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6077/10364434/2d8be54d2f83/12961_2023_1030_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6077/10364434/5669841c4e0b/12961_2023_1030_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6077/10364434/e8a928839cf4/12961_2023_1030_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6077/10364434/0a565220542d/12961_2023_1030_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6077/10364434/2d8be54d2f83/12961_2023_1030_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6077/10364434/5669841c4e0b/12961_2023_1030_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6077/10364434/e8a928839cf4/12961_2023_1030_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rural research capacity: a co-created model for research success.农村研究能力:研究成功的共创模式。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jul 24;21(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01030-5.
2
Barriers to Clinical Trial Implementation Among Community Care Centers.社区护理中心实施临床试验的障碍。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e248739. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8739.
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
7
Addressing opioid misuse through community-engaged strategy development: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.通过社区参与策略制定来解决阿片类药物滥用问题:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jul 19;10(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00612-z.
8
Multiple-level stakeholder engagement in malaria clinical trials: addressing the challenges of conducting clinical research in resource-limited settings.疟疾临床试验中的多层次利益相关者参与:应对在资源有限环境中开展临床研究的挑战
Trials. 2018 Mar 22;19(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2563-1.
9
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
10
Represent: A community engagement roadmap to improve participant representation in cancer early detection research: An Oregon case study.代表性:改善癌症早期检测研究中参与者代表性的社区参与路线图:俄勒冈州案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;11:1110543. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1110543. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of implementation mapping in healthcare settings: a scoping review.实施映射在医疗环境中的应用:一项范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1603178. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1603178. eCollection 2025.
2
Addressing Pancreatic Cancer Disparities in Oregon's Native American Population via Tribally Responsive Research Systems with The Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs.通过与温泉联合部落建立的部落响应式研究系统解决俄勒冈州美国原住民人口中的胰腺癌差异问题。
Res Sq. 2025 Jun 23:rs.3.rs-6637554. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6637554/v1.
3
Signals for change: A regional examination of rural clinical trial participant perspectives on values, health behaviors, and motivations for enrollment and retention in remote settings.

本文引用的文献

1
A Framework for Equitable Partnerships to Promote Cancer Prevention and Control in Rural Settings.促进农村地区癌症预防与控制的公平伙伴关系框架。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022 Mar 2;6(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac017.
2
Barriers and enablers to cancer clinical trial participation and initiatives to improve opportunities for rural cancer patients: A scoping review.癌症临床试验参与的障碍与促进因素以及改善农村癌症患者机会的举措:一项范围综述。
Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;19(4):464-476. doi: 10.1177/17407745221090733. Epub 2022 May 18.
3
Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation: Comparative Study Between Rural and Urban Participants.
变革信号:对农村临床试验参与者在价值观、健康行为以及参与和留在偏远地区试验的动机方面观点的区域考察
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Mar 13;9(1):e77. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.47. eCollection 2025.
4
'The seagull theory: Where people fly in, gather information… fly out and nothing ever comes about': A qualitative exploration of barriers and enablers to research participation among adults with type 2 diabetes living in Australian rural communities.“海鸥理论:人们飞进来,收集信息……然后飞走,却毫无结果”:对澳大利亚农村社区2型糖尿病成年人参与研究的障碍和促进因素的定性探索。
Diabet Med. 2025 May;42(5):e70027. doi: 10.1111/dme.70027. Epub 2025 Mar 23.
5
Challenges for research uptake for health policymaking and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.低中等收入国家健康政策制定与实践研究转化面临的挑战:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 6;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01084-5.
临床试验参与的障碍:农村与城市参与者的比较研究
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Apr 21;8(2):e33240. doi: 10.2196/33240.
4
Closing the Rural Cancer Care Gap: Three Institutional Approaches.缩小农村地区癌症治疗差距:三种机构方法。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Jul;16(7):422-430. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00174. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
5
The Impact of an Online Training Program About Cancer Clinical Trials on Primary Care Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs, and Behavior.在线癌症临床试验培训项目对初级保健医生知识、态度、信念和行为的影响。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Oct;36(5):1039-1044. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01731-3.
6
Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies.实施映射:运用干预映射法制定实施策略
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 18;7:158. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00158. eCollection 2019.
7
Science in the Heartland: Exploring determinants of offering cancer clinical trials in rural-serving community urology practices.美国心脏地带的科学:探索农村社区泌尿科实践中提供癌症临床试验的决定因素。
Urol Oncol. 2019 Aug;37(8):529.e9-529.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Magnitude of Structural, Clinical, and Physician and Patient Barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation.系统评价和荟萃分析癌症临床试验参与的结构、临床以及医生和患者障碍的程度。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Mar 1;111(3):245-255. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy221.
9
Geographic Distribution and Survival Outcomes for Rural Patients With Cancer Treated in Clinical Trials.农村癌症患者临床试验治疗的地理分布和生存结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug 3;1(4):e181235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1235.
10
An Overview of the National Cancer Institute's Initiatives to Accelerate Rural Cancer Control Research.美国国立癌症研究所加速农村癌症控制研究计划概述
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Nov;27(11):1240-1244. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0934.