• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三阴性乳腺癌核心针活检与手术标本中程序性死亡配体 1 状态的比较。

Comparison of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Status between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2023 Aug;64(8):518-525. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0090.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2023.0090
PMID:37488704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10375241/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Pembrolizumab is currently used to treat advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and high-risk early TNBC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) level and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status are predictors of response to NAC and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. We aimed to investigate whether the PD-L1 status in core needle biopsies (CNBs) could represent the whole tumor in TNBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 49 patients diagnosed with TNBC who received upfront surgery without NAC between January 2018 and March 2021 were included. The PD-L1 expression (SP142 and 22C3 clones) and TIL were evaluated in paired CNBs and resected specimens. The concordance PD-L1 status and TIL levels between CNBs and resected specimens were analyzed.

RESULTS

PD-L1 positivity was more frequently observed in resected specimens. The overall reliability of TIL level in the CNB was good [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.847, <0.001]. The agreements of PD-L1 status were good and fair, respectively (SP142, κ=0.503, <0.001; 22C3, κ=0.380, =0.010). As the core number of CNB increased, the reliability and agreement also improved, especially from five tumor cores (TIL, ICC=0.911, <0.001; PD-L1 [22C3], κ=0.750, =0.028). Regarding PD-L1 (SP142), no further improvement was observed with ≥5 tumor cores (κ=0.600, =0.058).

CONCLUSION

CNBs with ≥5 tumor cores were sufficient to represent the TIL level and PD-L1 (22C3) status in TNBC.

摘要

目的

帕博利珠单抗目前被用于治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)和接受新辅助化疗(NAC)的高危早期 TNBC。肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)水平和程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)状态是 NAC 和免疫检查点抑制剂治疗反应的预测因子。我们旨在研究 TNBC 中核心针活检(CNB)中的 PD-L1 状态是否可以代表整个肿瘤。

材料和方法

共纳入 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月期间未经 NAC 直接接受手术治疗的 49 例 TNBC 患者。在配对的 CNB 和切除标本中评估 PD-L1 表达(SP142 和 22C3 克隆)和 TIL。分析 CNB 和切除标本之间 PD-L1 状态和 TIL 水平的一致性。

结果

在切除标本中更频繁地观察到 PD-L1 阳性。CNB 中 TIL 水平的整体可靠性较好[组内相关系数(ICC)=0.847,<0.001]。PD-L1 状态的一致性较好和尚可,分别为(SP142,κ=0.503,<0.001;22C3,κ=0.380,=0.010)。随着 CNB 核心数量的增加,可靠性和一致性也得到提高,特别是从 5 个肿瘤核心开始(TIL,ICC=0.911,<0.001;PD-L1[22C3],κ=0.750,=0.028)。对于 PD-L1(SP142),≥5 个肿瘤核心时没有进一步提高(κ=0.600,=0.058)。

结论

≥5 个肿瘤核心的 CNB 足以代表 TNBC 中的 TIL 水平和 PD-L1(22C3)状态。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d707/10375241/481135b261df/ymj-64-518-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d707/10375241/1637370a02cf/ymj-64-518-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d707/10375241/65312e85914e/ymj-64-518-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d707/10375241/481135b261df/ymj-64-518-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d707/10375241/1637370a02cf/ymj-64-518-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d707/10375241/65312e85914e/ymj-64-518-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d707/10375241/481135b261df/ymj-64-518-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Status between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.三阴性乳腺癌核心针活检与手术标本中程序性死亡配体 1 状态的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2023 Aug;64(8):518-525. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0090.
2
Comparison of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes of breast cancer in core needle biopsies and resected specimens: a retrospective analysis.核心针活检与切除标本中乳腺癌浸润淋巴细胞的比较:一项回顾性分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Sep;171(2):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4842-7. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
3
Comparison of assessment of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status in triple-negative breast cancer biopsies and surgical specimens.比较程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)在三阴性乳腺癌活检和手术标本中的评估。
J Clin Pathol. 2024 Mar 20;77(4):239-245. doi: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208637.
4
[Expression comparison and clinical significance of PD-L1 (22C3) and PD-L1 (SP142) in triple negative breast cancer].三阴性乳腺癌中PD-L1(22C3)和PD-L1(SP142)的表达比较及临床意义
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2022 Mar 23;44(3):260-267. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200803-00704.
5
Comparison of SP142 and 22C3 PD-L1 assays in a population-based cohort of triple-negative breast cancer patients in the context of their clinically established scoring algorithms.在基于人群的三阴性乳腺癌患者队列中,比较 SP142 和 22C3 PD-L1 检测试剂盒在其临床建立的评分算法中的应用。
Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Oct 10;25(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01724-2.
6
The therapeutic candidate for immune checkpoint inhibitors elucidated by the status of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).免疫检查点抑制剂的治疗候选物由三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs)和程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)表达的状态所阐明。
Breast Cancer. 2018 Jan;25(1):34-42. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0781-0. Epub 2017 May 9.
7
Assessing the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression in triple negative breast cancer: Identifying optimal TILs cut-off value for pathologic reporting.评估三阴性乳腺癌中肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞与 PD-L1 表达的关系:确定病理报告中最佳 TILs 截断值。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2024 Jun;70:152294. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2024.152294. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
8
Discordance in PD-L1 expression using 22C3 and SP142 assays between primary and metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.22C3 和 SP142 检测原发性和转移性三阴性乳腺癌中 PD-L1 表达的不一致性。
Virchows Arch. 2023 Dec;483(6):855-863. doi: 10.1007/s00428-023-03634-2. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
9
Prognostic Role and Clinical Association of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte, Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression with Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Locally Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.局部晚期三阴性乳腺癌中肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞、程序性死亡配体-1 表达与中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值的预后作用及临床相关性。
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Apr;51(2):649-663. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.270. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
10
Interassay and interobserver comparability study of four programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry assays in triple-negative breast cancer.四种程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)免疫组织化学检测方法在三阴性乳腺癌中的检测结果的批内和批间及观察者间可比性研究。
Breast. 2021 Dec;60:238-244. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

1
HER2-low and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer: Are they connected?三阴性乳腺癌中的HER2低表达与肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞:它们有关联吗?
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Mar 11;26(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01783-z.
2
A simplified risk scoring system for predicting high-risk groups in gene expression tests for patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, and node-positive breast cancer.一种用于预测雌激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性且淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者基因表达检测中高危组的简化风险评分系统。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Dec;105(6):360-368. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.6.360. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Current Treatment Landscape for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC).早期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的当前治疗格局
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 15;12(4):1524. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041524.
2
Prognostic and Predictive Value of Immune-Related Gene Expression Signatures vs Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Early-Stage ERBB2/HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Correlative Analysis of the CALGB 40601 and PAMELA Trials.早期 ERBB2/HER2 阳性乳腺癌中免疫相关基因表达特征与肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞的预后和预测价值:CALGB 40601 和 PAMELA 试验的相关性分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):490-499. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.6288.
3
Tissue Selection for PD-L1 Testing in Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC).
Comparison of SP142 and 22C3 PD-L1 assays in a population-based cohort of triple-negative breast cancer patients in the context of their clinically established scoring algorithms.
在基于人群的三阴性乳腺癌患者队列中,比较 SP142 和 22C3 PD-L1 检测试剂盒在其临床建立的评分算法中的应用。
Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Oct 10;25(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13058-023-01724-2.
三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中 PD-L1 检测的组织选择。
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2022 Sep 1;30(8):549-556. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000001053. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
Spatial Characterization of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Breast Cancer Progression.肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞的空间特征与乳腺癌进展
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 26;14(9):2148. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092148.
5
Artificial Intelligence-Powered Spatial Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes as Complementary Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.人工智能驱动的肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞空间分析作为非小细胞肺癌免疫检查点抑制的补充生物标志物
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 10;40(17):1916-1928. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02010. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
6
Combination strategies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: current advances and future directions.PD-1/PD-L1 阻断的联合策略:当前进展和未来方向。
Mol Cancer. 2022 Jan 21;21(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01489-2.
7
PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Assay Comparison in Atezolizumab Plus nab-Paclitaxel-Treated Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.阿替利珠单抗联合白蛋白紫杉醇治疗晚期三阴性乳腺癌中 PD-L1 免疫组织化学检测方法的比较。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 29;113(12):1733-1743. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab108.
8
Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer With Chemotherapy.三阴性乳腺癌的化疗辅助和新辅助治疗。
Cancer J. 2021;27(1):41-49. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000498.
9
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗对比安慰剂联合化疗用于治疗既往未经治疗的局部晚期不可切除或转移性三阴性乳腺癌(KEYNOTE-355):一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、III 期临床研究。
Lancet. 2020 Dec 5;396(10265):1817-1828. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32531-9.
10
Neoadjuvant atezolizumab in combination with sequential nab-paclitaxel and anthracycline-based chemotherapy versus placebo and chemotherapy in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion031): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.早期三阴性乳腺癌患者新辅助阿替利珠单抗联合序贯纳武利尤单抗和基于蒽环类的化疗与安慰剂和化疗相比:一项随机、双盲、III 期试验(IMpassion031)。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1090-1100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31953-X. Epub 2020 Sep 20.