Hart R W, D'Ambrosio S M, Ng K J, Modak S P
Mech Ageing Dev. 1979 Feb;9(3-4):203-23. doi: 10.1016/0047-6374(79)90100-3.
The functional capacity of a cell, tissue, organ, or organism is dependent upon its ability to maintain the stability of its unit components. The higher the differentiated state of the system, the greater the amount of stability required to maintain that state as a function of time. Stability can be achieved via either redundancy or repair. Redundancy while easily achievable in biological systems is both costly and limited by thermodynamic considerations. Repair, in its general sense, has no such limitations. Repair at the cellular and macromolecular level is multiple in its forms and varies as a function of species, tissue, and stage of the cell cycle. The repair of DNA damage is a dynamic process with many components and subcomponents, each interacting with one another in order to achieve a balance between individual stability and evolutionary diversity. Thus, between internal and external factors which damage DNA and the subsequent expression of alterations in the functional stability of DNA lie the multi-functional pathways which attempt to maintain DNA fidelity. A strong correlation between ulta-violet light induced excision or pre-replication repair, as measured by autoradiogrphy and maximum species lifespan has been reported within different strains of the same species, between related species (e.g. Mus musculus and Peromyscus leucopus), between five orders of mammals, and most recently within members of the primate family. As has been demonstrated by the authors and others, differences in excision repair between species and tissues may relate to the turning off of portions of the repair processes during embryogenesis. Regardless of why such correlations exist or the nature of their mechanisms, it is naive to either assert or deny a causal role for DNA repair in longevity assurance systems. For example, while species-related differences in DNA repair may reflect the turning off of such repair processes during fetal development this does not mean that rates of accumulation of DNA damage are not altered by such changes. Indeed, such a phenomena might well explain the rapid evolution of lifespan within the primates without a concurrent input of new genes.
细胞、组织、器官或生物体的功能能力取决于其维持单位组成部分稳定性的能力。系统的分化状态越高,作为时间函数维持该状态所需的稳定性就越大。稳定性可以通过冗余或修复来实现。冗余虽然在生物系统中很容易实现,但成本高昂且受到热力学因素的限制。一般意义上的修复则没有这些限制。细胞和大分子水平的修复形式多样,并随物种、组织和细胞周期阶段而变化。DNA损伤的修复是一个动态过程,有许多组成部分和子组成部分,它们相互作用以在个体稳定性和进化多样性之间实现平衡。因此,在损伤DNA的内部和外部因素与DNA功能稳定性改变的后续表达之间,存在着试图维持DNA保真度的多功能途径。通过放射自显影测量的紫外线诱导切除或复制前修复与最大物种寿命之间的强相关性,已在同一物种的不同菌株之间、相关物种(如小家鼠和白足鼠)之间、五个哺乳动物目之间以及最近在灵长类动物家族成员中得到报道。正如作者和其他人所证明的,物种和组织之间切除修复的差异可能与胚胎发育过程中部分修复过程的关闭有关。无论这种相关性存在的原因或其机制的性质如何,断言或否认DNA修复在寿命保证系统中的因果作用都是幼稚的。例如,虽然DNA修复中与物种相关的差异可能反映了胎儿发育过程中此类修复过程的关闭,但这并不意味着DNA损伤的积累速率不会因这些变化而改变。事实上,这种现象很可能解释了灵长类动物寿命的快速进化,而无需同时输入新基因。