MacRae Sheila L, Croken Matthew McKnight, Calder R B, Aliper Alexander, Milholland Brandon, White Ryan R, Zhavoronkov Alexander, Gladyshev Vadim N, Seluanov Andrei, Gorbunova Vera, Zhang Zhengdong D, Vijg Jan
Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
InSilico Medicine, Inc., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Aging (Albany NY). 2015 Dec;7(12):1171-84. doi: 10.18632/aging.100866.
Differences in DNA repair capacity have been hypothesized to underlie the great range of maximum lifespans among mammals. However, measurements of individual DNA repair activities in cells and animals have not substantiated such a relationship because utilization of repair pathways among animals--depending on habitats, anatomical characteristics, and life styles--varies greatly between mammalian species. Recent advances in high-throughput genomics, in combination with increased knowledge of the genetic pathways involved in genome maintenance, now enable a comprehensive comparison of DNA repair transcriptomes in animal species with extreme lifespan differences. Here we compare transcriptomes of liver, an organ with high oxidative metabolism and abundant spontaneous DNA damage, from humans, naked mole rats, and mice, with maximum lifespans of ~120, 30, and 3 years, respectively, with a focus on genes involved in DNA repair. The results show that the longer-lived species, human and naked mole rat, share higher expression of DNA repair genes, including core genes in several DNA repair pathways. A more systematic approach of signaling pathway analysis indicates statistically significant upregulation of several DNA repair signaling pathways in human and naked mole rat compared with mouse. The results of this present work indicate, for the first time, that DNA repair is upregulated in a major metabolic organ in long-lived humans and naked mole rats compared with short-lived mice. These results strongly suggest that DNA repair can be considered a genuine longevity assurance system.
DNA修复能力的差异被认为是哺乳动物最大寿命差异巨大的潜在原因。然而,对细胞和动物个体DNA修复活性的测量并未证实这种关系,因为动物之间修复途径的利用情况——取决于栖息地、解剖特征和生活方式——在哺乳动物物种之间差异很大。高通量基因组学的最新进展,结合对参与基因组维持的遗传途径的更多了解,现在能够对具有极端寿命差异的动物物种的DNA修复转录组进行全面比较。在这里,我们比较了人类、裸鼹鼠和小鼠肝脏的转录组,肝脏是一个具有高氧化代谢和大量自发性DNA损伤的器官,其最大寿命分别约为120年、30年和3年,重点关注参与DNA修复的基因。结果表明,寿命较长的物种,即人类和裸鼹鼠,共享更高的DNA修复基因表达,包括几种DNA修复途径中的核心基因。一种更系统的信号通路分析方法表明,与小鼠相比,人类和裸鼹鼠中几种DNA修复信号通路有统计学意义的上调。本研究结果首次表明,与短命的小鼠相比,长寿的人类和裸鼹鼠的主要代谢器官中的DNA修复上调。这些结果强烈表明,DNA修复可以被认为是一个真正的长寿保障系统。