• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多动态预测模型的预测能力比较。

Predictive abilities comparison from multiple dynamic prediction models.

机构信息

UPRES 3859, SFR 4208, HIFIH, Angers University, Angers, France.

UMR INSERM 1066, CNRS 6021, MINT, Angers University, Angers, France.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Sep;32(9):1811-1822. doi: 10.1177/09622802231188521. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1177/09622802231188521
PMID:37489243
Abstract

With the development of personalized medicine, the study of individual prognosis appears to be a major contemporary scientific issue. Dynamic models are particularly well adapted to such studies by allowing some potential changes in the follow-up to be taken into account. In particular, this leads to more accurate predictions by updating the available information throughout the patient monitoring. Some mathematical tools have been developed to quantify and compare the effectiveness of dynamic predictions using dynamic versions of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Brier score in the competing risks setting. Nevertheless, only two predictive abilities can be compared. This may be too restrictive in a clinical context where more and more information can be collected during patient follow-up thanks to recent technological advances. Here we propose a new procedure that allows multiple comparisons of the predictive abilities of different biomarkers, based on the dynamic area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or Brier score. Performances of our testing procedure were assessed by simulations. Moreover, a motivating application in hepatology will be presented. Finally, this work compares more than two dynamic predictive abilities of biomarkers and is available via R functions on GitHub.

摘要

随着个性化医学的发展,个体预后的研究似乎是一个主要的当代科学问题。动态模型特别适合此类研究,因为它允许考虑随访中一些潜在的变化。特别是,通过在整个患者监测过程中更新可用信息,这可以实现更准确的预测。已经开发了一些数学工具,用于使用竞争风险环境下动态接收器操作特征曲线和 Brier 得分的动态版本来量化和比较动态预测的有效性。然而,只能比较两种预测能力。在临床环境中,这可能过于局限,因为最近的技术进步使得可以在患者随访期间收集越来越多的信息。在这里,我们提出了一种新的程序,该程序可以基于动态接收器操作特征曲线或 Brier 得分来比较不同生物标志物预测能力的多次比较。通过模拟评估了我们的测试程序的性能。此外,还将呈现一个在肝脏病学中的应用实例。最后,这项工作比较了生物标志物的两个以上的动态预测能力,并且可以通过 GitHub 上的 R 函数获得。

相似文献

1
Predictive abilities comparison from multiple dynamic prediction models.多动态预测模型的预测能力比较。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Sep;32(9):1811-1822. doi: 10.1177/09622802231188521. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
Individual dynamic prediction of clinical endpoint from large dimensional longitudinal biomarker history: a landmark approach.从大型纵向生物标志物历史中对临床终点进行个体动态预测:一种里程碑方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01660-3.
3
Software Application Profile: dynamicLM-a tool for performing dynamic risk prediction using a landmark supermodel for survival data under competing risks.软件应用程序配置文件:dynamicLM-一种使用生存数据竞争风险的里程碑超级模型进行动态风险预测的工具。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Dec 25;52(6):1984-1989. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyad122.
4
Quantifying and comparing dynamic predictive accuracy of joint models for longitudinal marker and time-to-event in presence of censoring and competing risks.在存在删失和竞争风险的情况下,对纵向标志物和事件发生时间的联合模型的动态预测准确性进行量化和比较。
Biometrics. 2015 Mar;71(1):102-113. doi: 10.1111/biom.12232. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
5
Does the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Extremity Metastases Generalize to a Contemporary Cohort of Patients? Temporal Validation From 2016 to 2020.SORG 机器学习算法对肢体转移瘤的泛化能力如何?2016 年至 2020 年的时间验证。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Dec 1;481(12):2419-2430. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002698. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
How Does the Skeletal Oncology Research Group Algorithm's Prediction of 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma Perform on International Validation?骨肿瘤研究组算法对软骨肉瘤患者 5 年生存率的预测在国际验证中的表现如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2300-2308. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001305.
7
Quantifying and estimating the predictive accuracy for censored time-to-event data with competing risks.量化和估计具有竞争风险的删失时间事件数据的预测准确性。
Stat Med. 2018 Sep 20;37(21):3106-3124. doi: 10.1002/sim.7806. Epub 2018 May 15.
8
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
9
External Validation and Optimization of the SPRING Model for Prediction of Survival After Surgical Treatment of Bone Metastases of the Extremities.四肢骨转移手术治疗后生存预测的 SPRING 模型的外部验证和优化。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Aug;476(8):1591-1599. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000534678.44152.ee.
10
Predictive performance of the competing risk model in screening for preeclampsia.竞争风险模型在子痫前期筛查中的预测性能。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;220(2):199.e1-199.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.1087. Epub 2018 Nov 14.