• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习方法预测 5 年乳腺癌生存:一项多中心研究。

Machine learning approaches for predicting 5-year breast cancer survival: A multicenter study.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Clinical Data Center, Office of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cancer Sci. 2023 Oct;114(10):4063-4072. doi: 10.1111/cas.15917. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1111/cas.15917
PMID:37489252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10551582/
Abstract

The study used clinical data to develop a prediction model for breast cancer survival. Breast cancer prognostic factors were explored using machine learning techniques. We conducted a retrospective study using data from the Taipei Medical University Clinical Research Database, which contains electronic medical records from three affiliated hospitals in Taiwan. The study included female patients aged over 20 years who were diagnosed with primary breast cancer and had medical records in hospitals between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2020. The data were divided into training and external testing datasets. Nine different machine learning algorithms were applied to develop the models. The performances of the algorithms were measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1-score. A total of 3914 patients were included in the study. The highest AUC of 0.95 was observed with the artificial neural network model (accuracy, 0.90; sensitivity, 0.71; specificity, 0.73; PPV, 0.28; NPV, 0.94; and F1-score, 0.37). Other models showed relatively high AUC, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83. According to the optimal model results, cancer stage, tumor size, diagnosis age, surgery, and body mass index were the most critical factors for predicting breast cancer survival. The study successfully established accurate 5-year survival predictive models for breast cancer. Furthermore, the study found key factors that could affect breast cancer survival in Taiwanese women. Its results might be used as a reference for the clinical practice of breast cancer treatment.

摘要

本研究使用临床数据开发了一种用于预测乳腺癌生存的模型。使用机器学习技术探索了乳腺癌预后因素。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,使用的数据来自台北医学大学临床研究数据库,其中包含来自台湾三家附属医院的电子病历。该研究包括年龄在 20 岁以上的女性患者,她们被诊断患有原发性乳腺癌,并且在医院中有病历记录,研究时间范围为 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。数据分为训练数据集和外部测试数据集。应用了九种不同的机器学习算法来开发模型。使用接收者操作特征曲线下的面积(AUC)、准确性、敏感度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和 F1 分数来衡量算法的性能。共有 3914 名患者纳入本研究。人工神经网络模型的 AUC 最高,为 0.95(准确性为 0.90;敏感度为 0.71;特异性为 0.73;PPV 为 0.28;NPV 为 0.94;F1 分数为 0.37)。其他模型的 AUC 也相对较高,范围在 0.75 到 0.83 之间。根据最佳模型结果,癌症分期、肿瘤大小、诊断年龄、手术和体重指数是预测乳腺癌生存的最关键因素。本研究成功建立了用于预测乳腺癌 5 年生存的准确模型。此外,本研究发现了影响台湾女性乳腺癌生存的关键因素。其结果可能被用于为台湾的乳腺癌治疗临床实践提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea5/10551582/81aaf9ec4eb2/CAS-114-4063-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea5/10551582/866b53fc0f9e/CAS-114-4063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea5/10551582/8db2d3206645/CAS-114-4063-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea5/10551582/81aaf9ec4eb2/CAS-114-4063-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea5/10551582/866b53fc0f9e/CAS-114-4063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea5/10551582/8db2d3206645/CAS-114-4063-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ea5/10551582/81aaf9ec4eb2/CAS-114-4063-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning approaches for predicting 5-year breast cancer survival: A multicenter study.机器学习方法预测 5 年乳腺癌生存:一项多中心研究。
Cancer Sci. 2023 Oct;114(10):4063-4072. doi: 10.1111/cas.15917. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
Machine learning applications for the prediction of surgical site infection in neurological operations.机器学习在神经外科手术部位感染预测中的应用。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Aug 1;47(2):E7. doi: 10.3171/2019.5.FOCUS19241.
3
Explainable Machine Learning Techniques To Predict Amiodarone-Induced Thyroid Dysfunction Risk: Multicenter, Retrospective Study With External Validation.可解释机器学习技术预测胺碘酮诱导甲状腺功能障碍风险:多中心回顾性研究及外部验证。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 7;25:e43734. doi: 10.2196/43734.
4
Predicting post-stroke pneumonia using deep neural network approaches.使用深度神经网络方法预测卒中后肺炎。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Dec;132:103986. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103986. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
5
Machine-Learning Based Risk Assessment for Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Adverse Events Among Breast Cancer Patients.基于机器学习的乳腺癌患者癌症治疗相关心脏不良事件风险评估。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jan 25;310:1006-1010. doi: 10.3233/SHTI231116.
6
Prediction of Neurological Outcomes in Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Survivors Immediately after Return of Spontaneous Circulation: Ensemble Technique with Four Machine Learning Models.院外心脏骤停幸存者自主循环恢复后即刻的神经功能结局预测:四种机器学习模型的集成技术。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jul 19;36(28):e187. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e187.
7
Prevalence and Predictability of Low-Yield Inpatient Laboratory Diagnostic Tests.低产量住院实验室诊断检测的流行率和可预测性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910967. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10967.
8
A New Method of Identifying Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients Using a Population-Based Electronic Medical Record System.一种利用基于人群的电子病历系统识别乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后病理完全缓解的新方法。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;30(4):2095-2103. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12955-6. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
9
Machine learning models in breast cancer survival prediction.用于乳腺癌生存预测的机器学习模型。
Technol Health Care. 2016;24(1):31-42. doi: 10.3233/THC-151071.
10
Prediction of myopia development among Chinese school-aged children using refraction data from electronic medical records: A retrospective, multicentre machine learning study.基于电子病历中的屈光数据预测中国学龄儿童近视进展:一项回顾性、多中心机器学习研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 6;15(11):e1002674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002674. eCollection 2018 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Early prediction of cardiovascular events following treatments in female breast cancer patients: Application of real-world data and artificial intelligence.女性乳腺癌患者治疗后心血管事件的早期预测:真实世界数据与人工智能的应用
Breast. 2025 Jun;81:104438. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104438. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
2
Predictive nomogram for risk of pulmonary infection in lung cancer patients undergoing radiochemotherapy: development and performance evaluation.接受放化疗的肺癌患者肺部感染风险的预测列线图:构建与性能评估
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Feb 15;15(2):781-796. doi: 10.62347/MQQB5184. eCollection 2025.
3
Artificial intelligence in breast cancer survival prediction: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The Emergence of the Racial Disparity in U.S. Breast-Cancer Mortality.美国乳腺癌死亡率种族差异的出现。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 23;386(25):2349-2352. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2200244. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
2
Shapley variable importance cloud for interpretable machine learning.用于可解释机器学习的Shapley变量重要性云图
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Feb 22;3(4):100452. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100452. eCollection 2022 Apr 8.
3
The impact of chemotherapy and survival prediction by machine learning in early Elderly Triple Negative Breast Cancer (eTNBC): a population based study from the SEER database.
人工智能在乳腺癌生存预测中的应用:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 7;14:1420328. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1420328. eCollection 2024.
4
Application of machine learning in breast cancer survival prediction using a multimethod approach.机器学习在乳腺癌生存预测中的多方法应用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 3;14(1):30147. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81734-y.
5
Innovations in Artificial Intelligence-Driven Breast Cancer Survival Prediction: A Narrative Review.人工智能驱动的乳腺癌生存预测创新:一项叙述性综述。
Cancer Inform. 2024 Sep 29;23:11769351241272389. doi: 10.1177/11769351241272389. eCollection 2024.
6
Prostate cancer treatment recommendation study based on machine learning and SHAP interpreter.基于机器学习和 SHAP 解释器的前列腺癌治疗推荐研究。
Cancer Sci. 2024 Nov;115(11):3755-3766. doi: 10.1111/cas.16327. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
7
Taipei Medical University Clinical Research Database: a collaborative hospital EHR database aligned with international common data standards.台北医学大学临床研究资料库:与国际通用数据标准一致的合作医院电子病历资料库。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 May 14;31(1):e100890. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100890.
8
Unveiling the future of COVID-19 patient care: groundbreaking prediction models for severe outcomes or mortality in hospitalized cases.揭示新冠患者护理的未来:针对住院病例严重后果或死亡的突破性预测模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 5;10:1289968. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1289968. eCollection 2023.
机器学习在老年三阴性乳腺癌(eTNBC)中的化疗影响和生存预测:来自 SEER 数据库的基于人群的研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 1;22(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02936-5.
4
The Application and Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Breast Cancer Prognosis: Retrospective Cohort Study.机器学习模型在乳腺癌预后预测中的应用与比较:回顾性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Feb 18;10(2):e33440. doi: 10.2196/33440.
5
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
6
Combining machine learning and conventional statistical approaches for risk factor discovery in a large cohort study.结合机器学习和传统统计方法在大型队列研究中发现风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 26;11(1):22997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02476-9.
7
DeepProg: an ensemble of deep-learning and machine-learning models for prognosis prediction using multi-omics data.DeepProg:一种使用多组学数据进行预后预测的深度学习和机器学习模型的集成。
Genome Med. 2021 Jul 14;13(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00930-x.
8
Deep learning assisted multi-omics integration for survival and drug-response prediction in breast cancer.深度学习辅助的多组学整合用于乳腺癌生存和药物反应预测
BMC Genomics. 2021 Mar 24;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07524-2.
9
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
Validity of the prognostication tool PREDICT version 2.2 in Japanese breast cancer patients.预测工具 PREDICT 版本 2.2 在日本乳腺癌患者中的有效性。
Cancer Med. 2021 Mar;10(5):1605-1613. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3713. Epub 2021 Jan 15.