Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 17;7(7):CD012206. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012206.pub2.
Peyronie's disease is a condition that results in the development of penile plaques that can lead to penile curvature, pain, and erectile dysfunction, making sexual activity difficult. A number of non-surgical interventions exist to improve this condition, which include topical and injection agents as well as mechanical methods; however, their effectiveness remains uncertain. We performed this review to determine the effects of these non-surgical treatments.
To assess the effects of non-surgical therapies compared to placebo or no treatment in individuals with Peyronie's disease.
We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings, up to 23 September 2022. We applied no restrictions on publication language or status.
We included trials in which men with Peyronie's disease were randomized to undergo non-surgical therapies versus placebo or no treatment for penile curvature and sexual function.
Two of four review authors, working in pairs, independently classified studies and abstracted data from the included studies. Primary outcomes were: patient-reported ability to have intercourse, quality of life, and treatment-related adverse effects. Secondary outcomes were: degree of penile curvature, discontinuation from treatment (for any reason), subjective patient-reported change in penile curvature, and improvement in penile pain. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model. We rated the certainty of evidence (CoE) according to the GRADE approach.
Our search identified 1288 relevant references of which we included 18 records corresponding to 14 unique randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1810 men. These informed 10 distinct comparisons with relevant outcome data that were mostly extracted from single trials. In this abstract, we focus only on the most clinically relevant comparisons for the three primary outcomes and also include the outcome of degree penile curvature. Injectional collagenase (short-term): We found no short-term evidence on injectional collagenase for patients' self-reported ability to have intercourse and treatment-related adverse effects compared to placebo injection. Injectional collagenase may result in little to no difference in quality of life (scale 0 to 20 with lower scores indicating better quality of life; mean difference (MD) 1.8 lower, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.58 to -0.02; 1 study, 134 participants; low CoE) and there may be little to no effect on the degree of penile curvature (MD 10.90 degrees less, 95% CI -16.24 to -5.56; 1 study, 136 participants; low CoE). Injectional collagenase (long-term): We also found no long-term evidence on injectional collagenase for patients' self-reported ability to have intercourse compared to placebo injection. It likely results in little to no effect on quality of life (MD 1.00 lower, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.40; 1 study, 612 participants; moderate CoE). Treatment-related adverse effects are likely increased (risk ratio (RR) 2.32, 95% CI 1.98 to 2.72; 1 study, 832 participants; moderate CoE). Injectional collagenase likely results in little to no change in the degree of penile curvature (MD 6.90 degrees less, 95% CI -9.64 to -4.14; 1 study, 612 participants; moderate CoE). Injectional verapamil (short-term): We are very uncertain how injectional verapamil may affect patients' self-reported ability to have intercourse compared to placebo injection short-term (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.43 to 114.70; 1 study, 14 participants; very low CoE). We found no evidence for the outcome of quality of life. We are very uncertain how injectional verapamil may affect treatment-related adverse effects (RR not estimable; 1 study, 14 participants; very low CoE). Similarly, we are very uncertain how injectional verapamil may affect degree of penile curvature (MD -1.86, 95% CI -10.39 to 6.67; 1 study, 14 participants; very low CoE). We found no long-term data for any outcome. Extracorporeal shock wave treatment (ESWT) (short-term): We are very uncertain how ESWT affects patients' self-reported ability to have intercourse short-term (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.71 to 3.60; 1 study, 26 participants; very low CoE). ESWT may result in little to no difference in quality of life (MD 3.10, 95% CI 1.57 to 4.64; 2 studies, 130 participants; low CoE). We are very uncertain if ESWT has an effect on treatment-related adverse effects (RR 2.73, 95% CI 0.74 to 10.14; 3 studies, 166 participants; very low CoE). ESWT may result in little to no difference in the degree of penile curvature compared to placebo (RR -2.84, 95% -7.35 to 1.67; 3 studies, 166 participants; low CoE). We found no long-term data for any outcome. Penile traction therapy (short-term): We found no evidence for whether penile traction compared to no treatment affects patients' self-reported ability to have intercourse. We are very uncertain how traction therapy may affect quality of life (MD 1.50 lower, 95% CI -3.42 to 0.42; 1 study, 90 participants; very low CoE). We are also very uncertain how traction therapy may affect treatment-related adverse effects (RR not estimable; 1 study, 90 participants; very low CoE) and how it affects the degree of curvature (MD 7.40 degrees less, 95% CI -11.18 to -3.62; 1 study, 89 participants; very low CoE). We found no long-term data for any outcome.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence supporting the effectiveness of most non-surgical treatments for Peyronie's disease. Existing trials are mostly of poor methodological quality and/or fail to address patient-centered outcomes. Injectional collagenase appears to have some effectiveness; however, many individuals may not experience the improvement as clinically relevant, and this comes with the risk of increased adverse events. There is a critical need for better non-surgical treatment options for men with Peyronie's disease.
佩罗尼病是一种导致阴茎斑块形成的疾病,可导致阴茎弯曲、疼痛和勃起功能障碍,使性行为变得困难。有许多非手术干预措施可改善这种情况,包括局部和注射剂以及机械方法;然而,其疗效仍不确定。我们进行了这项综述,以确定这些非手术治疗的效果。
评估非手术疗法与安慰剂或不治疗相比,在患有佩罗尼病的个体中的效果。
我们使用多个数据库(Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Google Scholar 和 Web of Science)、试验注册处、其他灰色文献来源和会议论文集进行了全面搜索,截至 2022 年 9 月 23 日。我们对出版语言或状态没有任何限制。
我们纳入了将患有佩罗尼病的男性随机分配接受非手术治疗与安慰剂或不治疗以改善阴茎弯曲和性功能的试验。
四名综述作者中的两名成对工作,独立对研究进行分类并从纳入的研究中提取数据。主要结局是:患者报告的性交能力、生活质量和治疗相关不良事件。次要结局是:阴茎弯曲程度、因任何原因停止治疗、患者报告的阴茎弯曲变化主观程度以及阴茎疼痛改善。我们使用随机效应模型进行了统计分析。我们根据 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性(CoE)。
我们的搜索确定了 1288 条相关参考文献,其中我们纳入了 18 份记录,对应 14 项独特的随机对照试验(RCT),涉及 1810 名男性。这些信息提供了 10 个具有相关结局数据的独特比较,这些比较主要来自单个试验。在本摘要中,我们仅关注三个主要结局中最具临床相关性的比较,还包括阴茎弯曲程度的结局。
注射用胶原酶(短期):我们没有发现短期注射用胶原酶在患者自我报告的性交能力和治疗相关不良事件方面优于安慰剂注射。与安慰剂相比,注射用胶原酶可能对生活质量没有影响或影响很小(0 到 20 分,得分越低表示生活质量越高;平均差值(MD)低 1.8,95%置信区间(CI)-3.58 至-0.02;1 项研究,134 名参与者;低 CoE),也可能对阴茎弯曲程度没有影响(MD 少 10.90 度,95%CI-16.24 至-5.56;1 项研究,136 名参与者;低 CoE)。
注射用胶原酶(长期):我们也没有发现长期注射用胶原酶在患者自我报告的性交能力方面优于安慰剂注射。它可能对生活质量没有影响或影响很小(MD 低 1.00,95%CI-1.60 至-0.40;1 项研究,612 名参与者;中等 CoE)。治疗相关不良事件可能增加(风险比(RR)2.32,95%CI 1.98 至 2.72;1 项研究,832 名参与者;中等 CoE)。与安慰剂相比,注射用胶原酶可能对阴茎弯曲程度没有影响或影响很小(MD 少 6.90 度,95%CI-9.64 至-4.14;1 项研究,612 名参与者;中等 CoE)。
注射用维拉帕米(短期):我们非常不确定注射用维拉帕米与安慰剂注射短期相比如何影响患者的性交能力(RR7.00,95%CI0.43 至 114.70;1 项研究,14 名参与者;非常低 CoE)。我们没有证据表明生活质量。我们非常不确定注射用维拉帕米如何影响治疗相关不良事件(RR 不可估计;1 项研究,14 名参与者;非常低 CoE)。同样,我们也非常不确定注射用维拉帕米如何影响阴茎弯曲程度(MD-1.86,95%CI-10.39 至 6.67;1 项研究,14 名参与者;非常低 CoE)。我们没有关于任何结局的长期数据。
体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)(短期):我们非常不确定 ESWT 对患者短期性交能力的影响(RR1.60,95%CI0.71 至 3.60;1 项研究,26 名参与者;非常低 CoE)。ESWT 可能对生活质量没有影响或影响很小(MD3.10,95%CI1.57 至 4.64;2 项研究,130 名参与者;低 CoE)。我们非常不确定 ESWT 是否会影响治疗相关不良事件(RR2.73,95%CI0.74 至 10.14;3 项研究,166 名参与者;非常低 CoE)。与安慰剂相比,ESWT 可能对阴茎弯曲程度没有影响或影响很小(RR-2.84,95%CI-7.35 至 1.67;3 项研究,166 名参与者;低 CoE)。我们没有关于任何结局的长期数据。
阴茎牵引疗法(短期):我们没有发现阴茎牵引与不治疗相比是否会影响患者的性交能力。我们非常不确定牵引疗法如何影响生活质量(MD 低 1.50,95%CI-3.42 至 0.42;1 项研究,90 名参与者;非常低 CoE)。我们也非常不确定牵引疗法如何影响治疗相关不良事件(RR 不可估计;1 项研究,90 名参与者;非常低 CoE)和它如何影响弯曲程度(MD 少 7.40 度,95%CI-11.18 至-3.62;1 项研究,89 名参与者;非常低 CoE)。我们没有关于任何结局的长期数据。
大多数非手术治疗佩罗尼病的有效性证据很少。现有的试验大多方法学质量较差,或者未能解决以患者为中心的结局。注射用胶原酶似乎有一定的疗效;然而,许多人可能不会经历到临床上相关的改善,而且这伴随着增加不良事件的风险。 男性患有佩罗尼病,迫切需要更好的非手术治疗选择。