Suppr超能文献

后路单侧小关节开窗联合定制 Y 形骨折复位装置治疗严重胸腰椎爆裂骨折的前瞻性对照研究。

Posterior unilateral small fenestration of lamina combined with a custom-made Y-shaped fracture reduction device for the treatment of severe thoracolumbar burst fracture: a prospective comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, China.

Department of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 25;18(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03971-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to evaluate the clinical effect of a custom-made Y-shaped fracture fragment reduction device and to assist in posterior unilateral small fenestration of lamina to reduce the fracture fragments.

METHODS

In this study, 40 patients were assigned to one of two groups: the traditional reduction device group (TRG) or the Y-shaped reduction device group (YRG). All patients underwent posterior unilateral small fenestration of the lamina and direct decompression through the spinal canal. And the operation time (OT), intraoperative bleeding (IB), preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up data on the spinal stenosis rate (SSR), Cobb angle, the anterior compression ratio of injured vertebrae (ACRIV), and ASIA neurological function grade were compared between the two groups.

RESULT

There were no complications, including vascular and nerve injury, serious postoperative infection, internal fixation fracture, or loosening, for any of the patients. And the average follow-up time of the two groups was 14.2 months, the average operation time of the TRG was 236.6 min, and the average intraoperative blood loss was 357.20 ml. Moreover, the average operation time of the YRG was 190.6 min, and the average intraoperative blood loss was 241.5 ml. There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of operation duration and intraoperative blood loss. The YRG's was lower than that of the TRG. Besides, there was no difference in SSR, Cobb angle, ACRIV, or neurological recovery between the two groups before or immediately after the operation or at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The Y-shaped fracture reduction device can reduce the fracture fragments and the OT and IB stably; it also has satisfactory postoperative curative effects and clinical utility.

摘要

背景

目的是评估一种定制的 Y 形骨折碎片复位装置的临床效果,并辅助通过椎板单侧小开窗实现骨折块的复位。

方法

本研究将 40 例患者分为传统复位装置组(TRG)或 Y 形复位装置组(YRG)。所有患者均行单侧小开窗入路,通过椎管直接减压。比较两组手术时间(OT)、术中出血量(IB)、术前、术后及末次随访时的椎管狭窄率(SSR)、Cobb 角、伤椎前缘压缩比(ACRIV)和 ASIA 神经功能分级。

结果

两组患者均无血管和神经损伤、严重术后感染、内固定骨折或松动等并发症。两组平均随访时间为 14.2 个月,TRG 组的平均手术时间为 236.6 分钟,平均术中出血量为 357.20ml;YRG 组的平均手术时间为 190.6 分钟,平均术中出血量为 241.5ml。两组在手术时间和术中出血量方面差异有统计学意义,YRG 组均低于 TRG 组。此外,两组患者在手术前后或末次随访时的 SSR、Cobb 角、ACRIV 或神经恢复均无差异。

结论

Y 形骨折复位装置可稳定复位骨折块,缩短手术时间,减少术中出血量,术后疗效及临床应用满意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/744e/10369761/21e048c6bc47/13018_2023_3971_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验