Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 1;80(9):962-967. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.2355.
The National Academy of Medicine's National Plan for Health Workforce Well-Being provides recommendations for supporting the mental health and well-being of health care workers. This article aims to guide implementation of National Academy of Medicine recommendations by describing 2 programs at Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), designed early in the COVID-19 pandemic to respond to the behavioral health needs of the health care workforce. The development of these programs, their similarities and differences, and the key lessons learned are discussed.
The well-being programs, CopeColumbia and UCSF Cope, shared key elements. Both efforts were led by their respective departments of psychiatry and used similar frameworks. Teams created strategic cross-university partnerships to share difficulties and successes across both programs. Moreover, both programs addressed compounding stressors of racial and political unrest, evaluated program components, and created resources for employee self-management. CopeColumbia and UCSF Cope differed in approaches to identifying high-risk employees and formal assessment and treatment pathways. From the authors' experience implementing these programs and having knowledge regarding health care workforce burnout, this article offers recommendations for the development of well-being programs. These include structural changes and resources to promote group and individual well-being emphasizing equity and justice, intentional involvement of psychiatry on well-being leadership teams, and bold efforts to destigmatize mental health care alongside clear paths to mental health treatment.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic revealed a need for institutions to support the mental health and emotional well-being of health care workers. By outlining the development and implementation of 2 well-being programs in large academic health care settings and making recommendations to promote workforce well-being, it is the authors' hope that leaders will be empowered to carry forward critical changes. Most importantly, implementing plans now will provide the resilience needed both for the long shadow of the pandemic and future crises.
国家医学科学院的国家卫生人力健康计划提供了支持医疗保健工作者心理健康和健康的建议。本文旨在通过描述哥伦比亚大学欧文医学中心和加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校(UCSF)在 COVID-19 大流行早期设计的 2 个计划,来指导国家医学科学院建议的实施,以满足医疗保健工作者的行为健康需求。讨论了这些计划的发展、它们的相似之处和不同之处,以及关键的经验教训。
健康计划 CopeColumbia 和 UCSF Cope 有一些共同的要素。这两个项目都是由各自的精神病学部牵头,使用类似的框架。团队建立了战略性的跨校合作关系,在两个项目之间分享困难和成功。此外,两个项目都针对种族和政治动荡带来的叠加压力,评估了项目组成部分,并为员工自我管理创建了资源。CopeColumbia 和 UCSF Cope 在识别高风险员工以及正式评估和治疗途径方面的方法有所不同。根据作者在实施这些项目和了解医疗保健工作者倦怠方面的经验,本文提出了制定健康计划的建议。这些建议包括促进群体和个人健康的结构性变革和资源,强调公平和正义,在健康领导团队中有意让精神病学参与,以及大力消除心理健康护理的污名化,同时为心理健康治疗提供明确途径。
COVID-19 大流行的影响揭示了各机构需要支持医疗保健工作者的心理健康和情感健康。通过概述在大型学术医疗保健环境中开发和实施 2 个健康计划,并提出促进劳动力健康的建议,作者希望赋予领导者实施关键变革的权力。最重要的是,现在实施计划将为大流行的长期影响和未来危机提供所需的弹性。