• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌肺转移瘤切除术后的肺部监测:利用临床病理危险因素指导策略。

Lung surveillance following colorectal cancer pulmonary metastasectomy: Utilization of clinicopathologic risk factors to guide strategy.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex.

Department of General Surgery, Baylor University, Houston, Tex.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar;167(3):814-819.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.07.017. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.07.017
PMID:37495170
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Appropriately selected patients clearly benefit from resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) pulmonary metastases (PMs). However, there remains equipoise surrounding optimal chest surveillance strategies following pulmonary metastasectomy. We aimed to identify risk factors that may inform chest surveillance in this population.

METHODS

Patients who underwent CRC pulmonary metastasectomy were identified from a single institution's prospectively maintained surgical database. Clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics were collected. Patients were stratified by diagnosis of subsequent PM within 6 months of the index lung resection. Multivariate modeling was used to evaluate risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients met the study's inclusion criteria, of whom 52.3% (n = 103) developed subsequent PM, at a median of 9.51 months following the index metastasectomy. Patients with KRAS alterations (odds ratio [OR], 3.073; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.363-6.926; P = .007), TP53 alterations (OR, 3.109; 95% CI, 1.318-7.341; P = .010) were found to be at risk of PM diagnosis within 6 months of the index metastasectomy, while those with an APC alteration (OR, .218; 95% CI, 0.080-0.598; P = .003) were protected. Moreover, patients who received systemic therapy within 3 months of the initial PM diagnosis also were more likely to develop early lung recurrence (OR, 2.105; 95% CI, 0.971-4.563; P = .059).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with KRAS alterations, TP53 alterations, and no APC alterations developed early recurrence in the lung following pulmonary metastasectomy, as did those who received chemotherapy after their initial PM diagnosis. As such, these groups benefit from early lung imaging after metastasectomy, as chest surveillance protocols should be based on patient-centered clinicopathologic and genomic risk factors.

摘要

背景

适当选择的患者显然可以从结直肠癌(CRC)肺转移瘤(PMs)的切除术获益。然而,在肺转移瘤切除术后,对于最佳的胸部监测策略仍存在争议。我们旨在确定可能为该人群提供胸部监测信息的危险因素。

方法

从单机构前瞻性维护的手术数据库中确定接受 CRC 肺转移瘤切除术的患者。收集临床病理和基因组特征。根据指数肺切除术后 6 个月内是否诊断出 PM 将患者分层。多变量建模用于评估危险因素。

结果

共有 197 名患者符合研究纳入标准,其中 52.3%(n=103)在指数转移瘤切除术 9.51 个月后发生了后续 PM。KRAS 改变(比值比 [OR],3.073;95%置信区间 [CI],1.363-6.926;P=0.007)、TP53 改变(OR,3.109;95%CI,1.318-7.341;P=0.010)的患者有在指数转移瘤切除术后 6 个月内诊断为 PM 的风险,而 APC 改变(OR,0.218;95%CI,0.080-0.598;P=0.003)的患者则有保护作用。此外,在初始 PM 诊断后 3 个月内接受系统治疗的患者也更有可能早期发生肺部复发(OR,2.105;95%CI,0.971-4.563;P=0.059)。

结论

在肺转移瘤切除术后,KRAS 改变、TP53 改变且无 APC 改变的患者以及初始 PM 诊断后接受化疗的患者,肺部早期复发。因此,这些患者在转移瘤切除术后需要进行早期肺部影像学检查,因为胸部监测方案应基于患者为中心的临床病理和基因组危险因素。

相似文献

1
Lung surveillance following colorectal cancer pulmonary metastasectomy: Utilization of clinicopathologic risk factors to guide strategy.结直肠癌肺转移瘤切除术后的肺部监测:利用临床病理危险因素指导策略。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Mar;167(3):814-819.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.07.017. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
EGFR, BRAF and KRAS status in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy from primary colorectal carcinoma: a prospective follow-up study.原发性结直肠癌肺转移患者 EGFR、BRAF 和 KRAS 状态:一项前瞻性随访研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Mar;21(3):946-54. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3386-7. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
3
Anatomical Resections Improve Survival Following Lung Metastasectomy of Colorectal Cancer Harboring KRAS Mutations.KRAS 突变的结直肠癌肺转移患者行解剖性肺切除术可改善生存
Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):1170-1177. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002829.
4
Curative Resection for Metachronous Pulmonary Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Analysis of Survival Rates and Prognostic Factors.结直肠癌异时性肺转移的根治性切除:生存率及预后因素分析
Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jan;49(1):104-115. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.367. Epub 2016 May 9.
5
Colorectal cancer mutations are associated with survival and recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy.结直肠癌突变与肺转移瘤切除术后的生存及复发相关。
J Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;120(4):729-735. doi: 10.1002/jso.25630. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
6
Prognostic factors after pulmonary metastasectomy of colorectal cancers: influence of liver metastasis.结直肠癌肺转移切除术后的预后因素:肝转移的影响
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul 29;14(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0940-3.
7
Prognostic factors of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal carcinoma.结直肠癌肺转移的预后因素。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Aug;17(2):303-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt164. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
8
Predictors of recurrent pulmonary metastases and survival after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌肺转移切除术后肺转移复发和生存的预测因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;94(6):1802-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
9
Lung surveillance following colorectal cancer pulmonary metastasectomy: Utilization of clinicopathologic risk factors to guide strategy.结直肠癌肺转移瘤切除术后的肺部监测:利用临床病理危险因素指导策略。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;168(1):e10-e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.10.033. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
10
KRAS exon 2 codon 13 mutation is associated with a better prognosis than codon 12 mutation following lung metastasectomy in colorectal cancer.在结直肠癌肺转移瘤切除术后,KRAS基因第2外显子13密码子突变较12密码子突变的预后更好。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 10;8(2):2514-2524. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13697.

引用本文的文献

1
Lung metastases.肺转移瘤。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Aug 21;11(1):60. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00642-1.
2
Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastasectomy: When, Why and How.结直肠癌肺转移瘤切除术:时机、原因与方法
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 3;16(7):1408. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071408.