Sharon Shay, Daher-Ghanem Narmeen, Zaid Deema, Gough Michael J, Kravchenko-Balasha Nataly
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Dental Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
The Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Front Oral Health. 2023 Jul 11;4:1180869. doi: 10.3389/froh.2023.1180869. eCollection 2023.
Although treatment modalities for head and neck cancer have evolved considerably over the past decades, survival rates have plateaued. The treatment options remained limited to definitive surgery, surgery followed by fractionated radiotherapy with optional chemotherapy, and a definitive combination of fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Lately, immunotherapy has been introduced as the fourth modality of treatment, mainly administered as a single checkpoint inhibitor for recurrent or metastatic disease. While other regimens and combinations of immunotherapy and targeted therapy are being tested in clinical trials, adapting the appropriate regimens to patients and predicting their outcomes have yet to reach the clinical setting. Radiotherapy is mainly regarded as a means to target cancer cells while minimizing the unwanted peripheral effect. Radiotherapy regimens and fractionation are designed to serve this purpose, while the systemic effect of radiation on the immune response is rarely considered a factor while designing treatment. To bridge this gap, this review will highlight the effect of radiotherapy on the tumor microenvironment locally, and the immune response systemically. We will review the methodology to identify potential targets for therapy in the tumor microenvironment and the scientific basis for combining targeted therapy and radiotherapy. We will describe a current experience in preclinical models to test these combinations and propose how challenges in this realm may be faced. We will review new players in targeted therapy and their utilization to drive immunogenic response against head and neck cancer. We will outline the factors contributing to head and neck cancer heterogeneity and their effect on the response to radiotherapy. We will review methods to decipher intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity and how these algorithms can predict treatment outcomes. We propose that (a) the sequence of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy should be designed not only to annul cancer directly, but to prime the immune response. (b) Fractionation of radiotherapy and the extent of the irradiated field should facilitate systemic immunity to develop. (c) New players in targeted therapy should be evaluated in translational studies toward clinical trials. (d) Head and neck cancer treatment should be personalized according to patients and tumor-specific factors.
尽管在过去几十年中头颈部癌的治疗方式有了很大发展,但生存率却停滞不前。治疗选择仍然局限于根治性手术、手术后进行分次放疗并可选择化疗,以及分次放疗与化疗的确定性联合。最近,免疫疗法已作为第四种治疗方式引入,主要作为单一检查点抑制剂用于复发性或转移性疾病。虽然免疫疗法和靶向疗法的其他方案及联合正在临床试验中进行测试,但使合适的方案适应患者并预测其结果尚未进入临床实践。放疗主要被视为一种靶向癌细胞同时将不必要的外周效应降至最低的手段。放疗方案和分割方式旨在实现这一目的,而在设计治疗方案时,辐射对免疫反应的全身效应很少被视为一个因素。为了弥补这一差距,本综述将强调放疗对局部肿瘤微环境的影响以及对全身免疫反应的影响。我们将回顾在肿瘤微环境中识别潜在治疗靶点的方法以及联合靶向治疗和放疗的科学依据。我们将描述目前在临床前模型中测试这些联合的经验,并提出如何应对这一领域的挑战。我们将回顾靶向治疗中的新参与者及其用于驱动针对头颈部癌的免疫原性反应的情况。我们将概述导致头颈部癌异质性的因素及其对放疗反应的影响。我们将回顾破译肿瘤间和肿瘤内异质性的方法以及这些算法如何预测治疗结果。我们提出:(a)手术、放疗、化疗和靶向治疗的顺序不仅应设计为直接消除癌症,还应激发免疫反应。(b)放疗的分割和照射野的范围应促进全身免疫的发展。(c)靶向治疗中的新参与者应在向临床试验的转化研究中进行评估。(d)头颈部癌的治疗应根据患者和肿瘤特异性因素进行个性化。