Bulder Ruth M A, van der Vorst Joost R, van Schaik Jan, Bedene Ajda, Lijfering Willem M, Bastiaannet Esther, Hamming Jaap F, Lindeman Jan H N
Department of Vascular Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):815-822. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006044. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
The aim of this time-trend analysis is to estimate long-term excess mortality and associated cardiovascular risk for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients after elective repair while addressing the changes in AAA management and patient selection over time.
Despite the intensification of endovascular aneurysm repair and cardiovascular risk management, Swedish population data suggest that AAA patients retain a persistently high long-term mortality after elective repair. The question is whether this reflects suboptimal treatment, a changing patient population over time, or a national phenomenon.
Nationwide time-trend analysis including 40,730 patients (87% men) following elective AAA repair between 1995 and 2017. Three timeframes were compared, each reflecting changes in the use of endovascular aneurysm repair and intensification of cardiovascular risk management. Relative survival analyses were used to estimate disease-specific excess mortality. Competing risk of death analysis evaluated the risk of cardiovascular versus noncardiovascular death. Sensitivity analysis evaluated the impact of changes in patient selection over time.
Short-term excess mortality significantly improved over time. Long-term excess mortality remained high with a doubled mortality risk for women (relative excess risk=1.87, 95% CI: 1.73-2.02). Excess mortality did not differ between age categories. The risk of cardiovascular versus noncardiovascular death remained similar over time, with a higher risk of cardiovascular death for women. Changes in patient population (ie, older and more comorbid patients in the latter period) marginally impacted excess mortality (2%).
Despite changes in AAA care, patients retain a high long-term excess mortality after elective repair with a persistent high cardiovascular mortality risk. In this, a clear sex - but no age - disparity stands out.
本次时间趋势分析的目的是估计择期修复术后腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者的长期超额死亡率及相关心血管风险,同时探讨AAA管理和患者选择随时间的变化。
尽管血管内动脉瘤修复术和心血管风险管理有所加强,但瑞典的人口数据表明,AAA患者择期修复术后的长期死亡率持续居高不下。问题在于这是反映了治疗不充分、患者群体随时间的变化,还是一种全国性现象。
对1995年至2017年间40730例择期AAA修复术后患者(87%为男性)进行全国性时间趋势分析。比较了三个时间框架,每个框架都反映了血管内动脉瘤修复术使用情况的变化和心血管风险管理的加强。采用相对生存分析来估计疾病特异性超额死亡率。竞争风险死亡分析评估心血管死亡与非心血管死亡的风险。敏感性分析评估患者选择随时间变化的影响。
短期超额死亡率随时间显著改善。长期超额死亡率仍然很高,女性的死亡风险加倍(相对超额风险=1.87,95%置信区间:1.73-2.02)。各年龄组的超额死亡率没有差异。心血管死亡与非心血管死亡的风险随时间保持相似,女性心血管死亡风险更高。患者群体的变化(即后期患者年龄更大、合并症更多)对超额死亡率的影响微乎其微(2%)。
尽管AAA治疗有所变化,但患者择期修复术后的长期超额死亡率仍然很高,心血管死亡风险持续居高不下。其中,明显存在性别差异——而非年龄差异。