• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球多重用药的患病率:一项系统评价。

Worldwide Prevalence of Polypharmacy: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Januário Beatriz Dias, Mafra Natália Silva, de Souza Silva Humberto, Carvalho Isabella Monteiro, Sena Ana Luiza Sobreira, Pereira Ana Paula Gomes Soares, de Faria Júnior Newton Santos, Campos Helton Oliveira

机构信息

Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais - Unidade Carangola, Carangola (MG), 36800- 000, Brasil.

Departamento de Nutrição e Saúde, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa (MG), 36570-900, Brasil.

出版信息

Curr Drug Metab. 2023;24(8):568-586. doi: 10.2174/1389200224666230727093010.

DOI:10.2174/1389200224666230727093010
PMID:37497705
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The present study has compiled the prevalence of polypharmacy worldwide and assessed the prevalence of polypharmacy in different populations, including community-dwelling individuals, hospitalized patients, and institutionalized patients.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted and reported according to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. A systematic search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scielo, was performed in March 2021 without any date and language restrictions. Combinations of the following keywords were used for the search strategy: polypharmacy OR multiple medications OR multiple medicines OR multiple drug AND prevalence. Based on the search and inclusion criteria, two hundred and eight studies (73,076,167 individuals) were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. It was observed that there is a wide variation in the prevalence of polypharmacy between studies.

RESULTS

The prevalence of polypharmacy was found to be 30.2%, 61.7%, and 56.9% for community-dwelling individuals, hospitalized patients, and institutionalized patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on the analyses, this systematic review has demonstrated a wide variation in the prevalence of polypharmacy between studies and countries and a high prevalence of polypharmacy in institutionalized and hospitalized patients.

摘要

引言

本研究汇总了全球多重用药的患病率,并评估了不同人群(包括社区居民、住院患者和机构化照护患者)中多重用药的患病率。

方法

本系统评价按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明中概述的指南进行并报告。2021年3月对电子数据库进行了系统检索,包括PubMed、科学网和Scielo,检索无任何日期和语言限制。搜索策略使用了以下关键词的组合:多重用药或多种药物或多种药品或多种药物与患病率。根据检索和纳入标准,选择了208项研究(73,076,167人)纳入该系统评价。观察到各研究之间多重用药的患病率存在很大差异。

结果

社区居民、住院患者和机构化照护患者的多重用药患病率分别为30.2%、61.7%和56.9%。

结论

基于分析,本系统评价表明,各研究和国家之间多重用药的患病率存在很大差异,且机构化照护患者和住院患者中多重用药的患病率很高。

相似文献

1
Worldwide Prevalence of Polypharmacy: A Systematic Review.全球多重用药的患病率:一项系统评价。
Curr Drug Metab. 2023;24(8):568-586. doi: 10.2174/1389200224666230727093010.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Prescribing cascades in community-dwelling adults: protocol for a systematic review.社区居住成年人中的处方级联:一项系统评价的方案
HRB Open Res. 2021 Sep 21;4:72. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13345.2. eCollection 2021.
4
Prevalence of Polypharmacy and Risks of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in the Older Population in a Developing Country: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.发展中国家老年人群多重用药的患病率及潜在不适当用药风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Gerontology. 2022;68(2):136-145. doi: 10.1159/000516075. Epub 2021 May 11.
5
Prevalence of Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Medications Use in Elderly Chinese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中国老年患者多重用药及潜在不适当用药的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 20;13:862561. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.862561. eCollection 2022.
6
Polypharmacy and pattern of medication use in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review.社区居住老年人的多种用药和用药模式:系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Apr;30(7-8):918-928. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15595. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.多药疗法的流行情况及相关因素:系统评价和 Meta 分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03279-x.
9
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy Among Patients With Schizophrenia in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗精神病药联合治疗在非洲精神分裂症患者中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Dec 8;24(12):956-964. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyab046.
10
A systematic scoping review of interventions to optimise medication prescribing and adherence in older adults with cancer.一项系统的范围综述,旨在优化老年癌症患者的药物处方和用药依从性的干预措施。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Mar;18(3):2392-2402. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
General polypharmacy, psychotropic polypharmacy, attitudes of patients on psychotropic deprescribing, and associated factors in adult psychiatric outpatients: a survey study in a comprehensive specialized hospital, northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部一家综合性专科医院的成年精神科门诊患者中的一般多重用药、精神药物多重用药、患者对精神药物减药的态度及相关因素:一项调查研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 8;25(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06746-y.
2
Impact of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Polypharmacy Management in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Insights From a Specialized Outpatient Clinic.多学科方法对社区居住老年人多重用药管理的影响:来自一家专科门诊诊所的见解
Aging Med (Milton). 2025 Feb 18;8(1):e70001. doi: 10.1002/agm2.70001. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Potential Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Managing Polypharmacy in Saudi Arabia: A Narrative Review.人工智能在沙特阿拉伯管理多重用药中的潜在应用:一项叙述性综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 5;12(7):788. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12070788.