Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel;
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Nucl Med. 2023 Oct;64(10):1610-1616. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264923. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
Dosimetry after Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) enables estimation of radiation doses absorbed by normal organs and target lesions. This process is time-consuming and requires multiple posttreatment studies on several subsequent days. In a previous study, we described a newly developed multiple-linear-regression model to predict absorbed doses (ADs) from a single-time-point (STP) posttreatment study acquired 168 h after the first infusion and 24 h after the following ones, with similar results to the standard multiple-time-point (MTP) protocol. The present study aimed to validate this model in a large patient cohort and to assess whether STP dosimetry affects patient management decisions compared with our MTP protocol. Quantitative Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT post-PRRT data from 159 consecutive patients (172 therapies, 477 therapy cycles) were retrospectively analyzed. ADs obtained from an STP model were compared with those obtained using an MTP model. We evaluated the impact of the STP model on the decision on whether PRRT should be stopped because of an expected kidney AD exceeding the safety threshold. We hypothesized that patient management based on the STP model does not differ from that based on the MTP model in at least 90% of the cases. There was no difference in management decisions between the MTP and STP models in 170 of 172 therapies (98.8%). A Fisher χ test for combined probabilities produced a composite value of 0.0003. Mean cumulative AD relative differences between the STP and MTP models were 0.8% ± 8.0%, -7.7% ± 4.8%, 0.0% ± 11.4%, -2.8% ± 6.3%, and -2.1% ± 18.4% for kidneys, bone marrow, liver, spleen, and tumors, respectively (Pearson = 0.99 for all), for patients who underwent 4 therapy cycles. Similar results were obtained with fewer therapy cycles. Estimated radiation ADs and patient management decisions were similar with the STP and MTP models. The STP model can simplify the dosimetry process while also reducing scanner and staff time and improving patient comfort.
Lu-DOTATATE 肽受体放射性核素治疗 (PRRT) 后的剂量测定可估计正常器官和靶病变吸收的辐射剂量。这个过程耗时且需要在随后的几天内进行多次治疗后研究。在之前的研究中,我们描述了一种新开发的多元线性回归模型,用于预测单次(STP)治疗后研究中 168 小时和后续单次输注后 24 小时吸收剂量(AD),其结果与标准多次时间点(MTP)方案相似。本研究旨在验证该模型在大型患者队列中的有效性,并评估 STP 剂量测定与我们的 MTP 方案相比是否会影响患者管理决策。对 159 例连续患者(172 次治疗,477 个治疗周期)的回顾性 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT 治疗后数据进行分析。比较了 STP 模型获得的 AD 与 MTP 模型获得的 AD。我们评估了 STP 模型对 PRRT 是否应因预期肾脏 AD 超过安全阈值而停止的决策的影响。我们假设,基于 STP 模型的患者管理在至少 90%的情况下与基于 MTP 模型的患者管理没有差异。在 172 次治疗中的 170 次(98.8%)中,MTP 和 STP 模型的管理决策没有差异。联合概率的 Fisher χ 检验产生了一个综合值 0.0003。STP 和 MTP 模型之间的平均累积 AD 相对差异分别为 0.8%±8.0%、-7.7%±4.8%、0.0%±11.4%、-2.8%±6.3%和-2.1%±18.4%,用于肾脏、骨髓、肝脏、脾脏和肿瘤,分别为(所有 Pearson = 0.99),用于接受 4 次治疗周期的患者。使用较少的治疗周期获得了类似的结果。STP 和 MTP 模型的估计辐射 AD 和患者管理决策相似。STP 模型可以简化剂量测定过程,同时减少扫描仪和工作人员的时间,提高患者的舒适度。