Suppr超能文献

知情同意书在影像引导下的程序:全国范围内的调查的看法和当前的做法。

Informed consent for image-guided procedures: a nationwide survey of perceptions and current practices.

机构信息

Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Department of General Surgery, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2023 Oct;78(10):730-736. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.06.008. Epub 2023 Jun 29.

Abstract

AIM

To characterise the current landscape of informed consent practices for image-guided procedures, including location of consent, guideline availability, and utility of decision-aid resources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey of 159 interventional radiologists was conducted from April through June 2022. The survey evaluated participant demographics (gender, practice type, and level of training) and consent practices. Fifteen questions investigated discussion of benefits, risks, and alternatives, who obtained consent, location of consent conversations, how decision-making capacity is assessed, availability of formal guidance on consent discussions, and if and how decision-aids are used.

RESULTS

Most respondents (93.7%) were "extremely" or "very" comfortable discussing the benefits and risks of image-guided procedures during informed consent. Most respondents were "very" comfortable discussing alternative treatments within radiology (86.8%) while fewer felt confident regarding alternatives outside radiology (46.5%). Most respondents indicated obtaining consent in a pre-procedure area (89.9%), while 12.7% of respondents obtained consent in the procedure room. Of the respondents, 66.7% did not have formal education or documented guidance on what providers should disclose during consent. Ninety-two respondents (57.9%) reported using decision aids. The type of decision aid varied, with most reporting using illustrations or drawings (46.6%). Decision aid utility was more prevalent in non-teaching/academic (71.4%) versus academic (61%) institutions (p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of demographics, interventionalists are confident in discussing benefits, risks, and alternative image-guided therapies, but are less confident discussing alternative treatment options outside of radiology. Formal education on informed consent is less common, and the use of decision aids varies between teaching and non-teaching institutions.

摘要

目的

描述当前影像引导程序知情同意实践的现状,包括同意书的位置、指南的可用性以及决策辅助资源的使用情况。

材料与方法

2022 年 4 月至 6 月期间,对 159 名介入放射科医生进行了一项调查。该调查评估了参与者的人口统计学特征(性别、实践类型和培训水平)和同意实践。15 个问题调查了讨论益处、风险和替代方案、谁获得同意、同意谈话的地点、如何评估决策能力、是否有关于同意讨论的正式指导以及是否使用和如何使用决策辅助工具。

结果

大多数受访者(93.7%)在知情同意过程中“非常”或“非常”愿意讨论影像引导程序的益处和风险。大多数受访者“非常”愿意在放射科内讨论替代治疗方法(86.8%),而对放射科外的替代方案则不太有信心(46.5%)。大多数受访者表示在术前区域获得同意(89.9%),而 12.7%的受访者在手术室内获得同意。在受访者中,66.7%的人没有关于提供者在同意过程中应披露哪些内容的正式教育或书面指导。92 名受访者(57.9%)报告使用了决策辅助工具。决策辅助工具的类型各不相同,其中大多数报告使用插图或绘图(46.6%)。非教学/学术(71.4%)机构比学术(61%)机构更普遍使用决策辅助工具(p=0.02)。

结论

无论人口统计学特征如何,介入放射科医生在讨论影像引导疗法的益处、风险和替代疗法方面都很有信心,但在讨论放射科外的替代治疗方案方面则信心不足。关于知情同意的正式教育较少,教学和非教学机构之间决策辅助工具的使用情况也不同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验