Suppr超能文献

滴答作响:院前插管与更长的现场时间相关,而没有任何生存获益。

Tick-tock: Prehospital intubation is associated with longer field time without any survival benefit.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.

Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.

出版信息

Surgery. 2023 Oct;174(4):1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.06.021. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prehospital endotracheal intubation is a debated topic, and few studies have found it beneficial after trauma. A growing body of evidence suggests that prehospital endotracheal intubation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Our study was designed to compare patients with attempted prehospital endotracheal intubation to those intubated promptly upon emergency department arrival.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a single-center trauma research data repository was utilized. Inclusion criteria included age ≥15 years, transport from the scene by ground ambulance, and undergoing prehospital endotracheal intubation attempts or intubation within 10 minutes of emergency department arrival without prior prehospital endotracheal intubation attempt. Propensity score matching was used to minimize differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Standard mean differences are also presented for pre- and post-matching datasets to evaluate for covariate balance.

RESULTS

In total, 208 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 95 patients (46%) underwent prehospital endotracheal intubation, which was successful in 47% of cases. A control group of 113 patients (54%) were intubated within 10 minutes of emergency department arrival. We performed propensity score matching between cohorts based on observed differences after univariate analysis and used standard mean differences to estimate covariate balance. After propensity score matching, patients who underwent prehospital endotracheal intubation experienced a longer time on scene as compared with those intubated in the emergency department (9 minutes [interquartile range 6-12] vs 6 minutes [interquartile range 5-9], P < .01) without difference in overall mortality (67% vs 65%, P = 1.00). Rapid sequence intubation was not used in the field; however, it was used for 58% of patients intubated within 10 minutes of emergency department arrival. After matched analysis, patients with a failed prehospital intubation attempt were equally likely to receive rapid sequence intubation during re-intubation in the emergency department as compared with those undergoing a first attempt (n = 13/28, 46% vs n = 28/63, 44%, P = 1.00, standard mean differences 0.04). Among patients with prehospital arrest (n = 98), prehospital endotracheal intubation was associated with shorter time to death (8 minutes [interquartile range 3-17] vs 14 minutes [interquartile range 8-45], P = .008) and longer total transport time (23 minutes [interquartile range 19-31] vs 19 minutes [interquartile range 16-24], P = .006), but there was no difference in observed mortality (n = 29/31, 94% vs n = 30/31, 97%, P = 1.00, standard mean differences = 0.15) after propensity score matching.

CONCLUSION

Prehospital providers should prioritize expeditious transport over attempting prehospital endotracheal intubation, as prehospital endotracheal intubation is inconsistently successful, may delay definitive care, and appears to have no survival benefit.

摘要

背景

院前气管插管是一个有争议的话题,很少有研究发现它对创伤后有益。越来越多的证据表明,院前气管插管与发病率和死亡率的增加有关。我们的研究旨在比较尝试院前气管插管的患者与在急诊科到达后 10 分钟内立即插管的患者。

方法

利用单中心创伤研究数据存储库进行回顾性研究。纳入标准包括年龄≥15 岁、由地面救护车从现场转运、接受院前气管插管尝试或在急诊科到达后 10 分钟内插管,且无院前气管插管尝试。使用倾向评分匹配来尽量减少两组间基线特征的差异。还提出了标准均数差,以评估预处理和后处理数据集之间的协变量平衡。

结果

共有 208 名患者符合纳入标准。其中,95 名患者(46%)接受了院前气管插管,其中 47%的病例插管成功。对照组 113 名患者(54%)在急诊科到达后 10 分钟内插管。我们根据单变量分析后的观察差异对队列进行了倾向评分匹配,并使用标准均数差来估计协变量平衡。在进行倾向评分匹配后,与在急诊科插管的患者相比,进行院前气管插管的患者在现场的时间更长(9 分钟[四分位间距 6-12] vs 6 分钟[四分位间距 5-9],P<.01),但总死亡率无差异(67% vs 65%,P=1.00)。现场未使用快速序贯诱导;然而,在急诊科到达后 10 分钟内插管的患者中,58%使用了快速序贯诱导。在匹配分析后,与首次尝试相比,尝试院前插管失败的患者在急诊科再次插管时同样有可能接受快速序贯诱导(n=13/28,46% vs n=28/63,44%,P=1.00,标准均数差 0.04)。在院前发生心跳骤停的患者中(n=98),院前气管插管与死亡时间缩短相关(8 分钟[四分位间距 3-17] vs 14 分钟[四分位间距 8-45],P=0.008)和总转运时间延长(23 分钟[四分位间距 19-31] vs 19 分钟[四分位间距 16-24],P=0.006),但在倾向评分匹配后,观察死亡率无差异(n=29/31,94% vs n=30/31,97%,P=1.00,标准均数差 0.15)。

结论

院前医护人员应优先快速转运,而不是尝试院前气管插管,因为院前气管插管成功率不一致,可能会延迟确定性治疗,且似乎没有生存获益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验