Suppr超能文献

抗抑郁药戒烟的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for smoking cessation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Health Technology Assessment Center/Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Addict Biol. 2023 Aug;28(8):e13303. doi: 10.1111/adb.13303.

Abstract

To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of antidepressants in helping smokers quit tobacco dependence, five databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT ) on different antidepressant interventions involving smoking cessation in populations (September 2022). The STATA 15.1 software was used to perform network meta-analysis. The Cochrane bias risk tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and CINeMA was used to evaluate the evidence credibility for the effect of different interventions on smoking cessation. In all, 107 RCTs involving 42 744 patients were included. Seven studies were rated as having a low risk of bias. All trials reported 18 interventions and 153 pairwise comparisons were generated. The network meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo, varenicline + bupropion (OR = 3.53, 95% CI [2.34, 5.34]), selegiline + nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (OR = 3.78, 95% CI [1.20, 11.92]), nortriptyline + NRT (OR = 2.33, 95% CI [1.21, 4.47), nortriptyline (OR = 1.58, 95% CI [1.11,2.26]), naltrexone + bupropion (OR = 3.84, 95% CI [1.39, 10.61]), bupropion + NRT (OR = 2.29, 95% CI [1.87, 2.81]) and bupropion (OR = 1.70, 95% CI [1.53, 1.89]) showed benefits with respect to smoking cessation. In addition, bupropion + NRT showed better effects than bupropion (OR = 1.35, 95% CI [1.12, 1.64]) and NRT (OR = 1.38, 95% CI [1.13, 1.69]) alone. The final cumulative ranking curve showed that varenicline + bupropion was the most likely to be the best intervention. There was moderate- to very-low-certainty evidence that most interventions showed benefits for smoking cessation compared with placebo, including monotherapy and combination therapies. Varenicline + bupropion had a higher probability of being the best intervention for smoking cessation.

摘要

为了评估抗抑郁药在帮助吸烟者戒除烟草依赖方面的有效性、安全性和耐受性,检索了五个数据库,以寻找涉及不同抗抑郁药干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT),这些干预措施针对的是戒烟人群(2022 年 9 月)。使用 STATA 15.1 软件进行网络荟萃分析。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,使用 CINeMA 评估不同干预措施对戒烟效果的证据可信度。共纳入 107 项 RCT,涉及 42744 名患者。有 7 项研究被评为低偏倚风险。所有试验均报告了 18 种干预措施,共产生了 153 个两两比较。网络荟萃分析显示,与安慰剂相比,伐伦克林+安非他酮(OR=3.53,95%CI[2.34,5.34])、司来吉兰+尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)(OR=3.78,95%CI[1.20,11.92])、去甲替林+NRT(OR=2.33,95%CI[1.21,4.47])、去甲替林(OR=1.58,95%CI[1.11,2.26])、纳曲酮+安非他酮(OR=3.84,95%CI[1.39,10.61])、安非他酮+NRT(OR=2.29,95%CI[1.87,2.81])和安非他酮(OR=1.70,95%CI[1.53,1.89])在戒烟方面显示出益处。此外,安非他酮+NRT 显示出比安非他酮(OR=1.35,95%CI[1.12,1.64])和 NRT(OR=1.38,95%CI[1.13,1.69])单独使用更好的效果。最终累积排序曲线表明,伐伦克林+安非他酮最有可能成为最佳干预措施。有中等至极低确定性证据表明,与安慰剂相比,大多数干预措施对戒烟均有获益,包括单药治疗和联合治疗。伐伦克林+安非他酮更有可能成为戒烟的最佳干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验