• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗对急性阑尾炎患者手术部位伤口感染和住院时间的影响:一项荟萃分析。

Effect of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy on surgical site wound infection and hospital stay in patients with acute appendicitis: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The People's Hospital of Bozhou, Bozhou, China.

Department of Infectious Disease, The People's Hospital of Bozhou, Bozhou, China.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4281-4290. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14330. Epub 2023 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.14330
PMID:37500538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10681414/
Abstract

In this meta-analysis, we comprehensively evaluated the effect of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) on surgical site infections and other perioperative outcomes in patients with acute appendicitis. Relevant studies on ERAT for acute appendicitis were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data, from database inception to June 2023. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity among the included studies was analysed, and odds ratios (ORs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs), along with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated. In total, 24 studies involving 1937 patients were included in the meta-analysis. ERAT reduced the surgical duration (SMD: -1.70, 95% CI: -2.24 to -1.16, p < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (SMD: -2.09, 95% CI: -2.64 to -1.53, p < 0.001) significantly more than open appendectomy (OA) did. Furthermore, ERAT decreased the incidence of surgical site wound infections (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.13-0.37, p < 0.001) and postoperative complications (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.11-0.21, p < 0.001) more than OA did. This study demonstrated that ERAT is a safe and effective endoscopic treatment modality for acute appendicitis, contributing to a significant reduction in the surgical duration, length of hospital stay, and incidence of surgical site wound infections and postoperative complications. Hence, ERAT has clinical significance and the potential for further application and dissemination.

摘要

在这项荟萃分析中,我们全面评估了内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗(ERAT)对急性阑尾炎患者手术部位感染和其他围手术期结局的影响。从数据库建立到 2023 年 6 月,我们从 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、中国知网和万方数据中检索了关于 ERAT 治疗急性阑尾炎的相关研究。使用 RevMan 5.4 进行统计分析。分析了纳入研究的异质性,并计算了比值比(OR)或标准化均数差(SMD)及其各自的 95%置信区间(CI)。共有 24 项研究纳入了 1937 名患者的荟萃分析。ERAT 显著减少手术时间(SMD:-1.70,95%CI:-2.24 至-1.16,p<0.001)和住院时间(SMD:-2.09,95%CI:-2.64 至-1.53,p<0.001),明显优于开腹阑尾切除术(OA)。此外,ERAT 降低了手术部位伤口感染的发生率(OR:0.22,95%CI:0.13-0.37,p<0.001)和术后并发症的发生率(OR:0.16,95%CI:0.11-0.21,p<0.001),明显优于 OA。本研究表明,ERAT 是一种安全有效的急性阑尾炎内镜治疗方法,可显著缩短手术时间、住院时间,降低手术部位伤口感染和术后并发症的发生率。因此,ERAT 具有临床意义和进一步应用和推广的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/f4a977a7b732/IWJ-20-4281-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/b27cc90d1185/IWJ-20-4281-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/51e0c8b36773/IWJ-20-4281-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/5cbdaccaee50/IWJ-20-4281-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/2d62ea65b907/IWJ-20-4281-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/85feb8f435df/IWJ-20-4281-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/ca8bd1a0ca8f/IWJ-20-4281-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/f4a977a7b732/IWJ-20-4281-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/b27cc90d1185/IWJ-20-4281-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/51e0c8b36773/IWJ-20-4281-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/5cbdaccaee50/IWJ-20-4281-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/2d62ea65b907/IWJ-20-4281-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/85feb8f435df/IWJ-20-4281-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/ca8bd1a0ca8f/IWJ-20-4281-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd4/10681414/f4a977a7b732/IWJ-20-4281-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy on surgical site wound infection and hospital stay in patients with acute appendicitis: A meta-analysis.内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗对急性阑尾炎患者手术部位伤口感染和住院时间的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4281-4290. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14330. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
2
Is endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy a better modality for acute uncomplicated appendicitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜逆行性阑尾炎治疗术对于急性单纯性阑尾炎而言是一种更好的治疗方式吗?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Nov 26;9(33):10208-10221. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i33.10208.
3
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) vs appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis: A prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial.内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗(ERAT)与阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的前瞻性多中心随机临床试验。
J Dig Dis. 2022 Nov;23(11):636-641. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13148. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
4
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.内镜逆行性阑尾炎治疗与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的比较。
Endoscopy. 2022 Aug;54(8):747-754. doi: 10.1055/a-1737-6381. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a pilot study.内镜逆行性阑尾炎治疗与腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:一项初步研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 13;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02139-7.
6
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.
7
Clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis treatment for acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec;47(10):102241. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102241. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
8
Effects of clinical nursing pathway on surgical site wound infection in patients undergoing acute appendicitis surgery: A meta-analysis.临床护理路径对急性阑尾炎手术患者手术部位伤口感染的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14600. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14600. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
9
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy for management of acute appendicitis.内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术用于急性阑尾炎的管理
Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2480-2487. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08533-8. Epub 2021 May 13.
10
Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis by Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy (ERAT): Combination of Colonoscopy and Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicography.经内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术(ERAT)诊断急性阑尾炎:结肠镜检查与内镜逆行阑尾造影术的联合应用
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Nov;61(11):3285-3291. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4245-8. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Application effect of anticipatory care in postoperative infection and complication management in children with acute appendicitis.预见性护理在小儿急性阑尾炎术后感染及并发症管理中的应用效果
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 May 27;17(5):103141. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.103141.
2
RETRACTION: Effect of Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy on Surgical Site Wound Infection and Hospital Stay in Patients With Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis.撤回声明:内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗对急性阑尾炎患者手术部位伤口感染及住院时间的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2025 Mar;22(3):e70313. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70313.
3
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a pilot study.内镜逆行性阑尾炎治疗与腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:一项初步研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 13;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02139-7.
2
Effect of Oral Moxifloxacin vs Intravenous Ertapenem Plus Oral Levofloxacin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC II Randomized Clinical Trial.口服莫西沙星对比静脉注射厄他培南加口服左氧氟沙星治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的效果:APPAC II 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 26;325(4):353-362. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23525.
3
内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 24;17:17562848241275314. doi: 10.1177/17562848241275314. eCollection 2024.
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) : a multicenter retrospective study in China.
内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术(ERAT):一项中国多中心回顾性研究
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):905-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3750-0. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
4
Generation of colonic IgA-secreting cells in the caecal patch.盲肠黏膜集合淋巴小结中结肠 IgA 分泌细胞的生成。
Nat Commun. 2014 Apr 10;5:3704. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4704.
5
Meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional multiport laparoscopic appendectomy.比较单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的研究的荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2013 Aug;183(2):e49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.03.038. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
6
Free and pedicled appendix transfer for various reconstructive procedures.游离和带蒂阑尾转移用于各种重建手术。
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Dec;69(6):602-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827475e2.
7
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy: a pilot minimally invasive technique (with videos).内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗:一种微创技术的初步探索(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Oct;76(4):862-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.05.029. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
8
Use of antibiotics alone for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单独使用抗生素治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2011 Oct;150(4):673-83. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.018.
9
Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample.阴性阑尾切除术:一项全国代表性样本的 10 年回顾。
Am J Surg. 2011 Apr;201(4):433-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.009.
10
Performance value of high risk factors in colorectal cancer screening in China.中国结直肠癌筛查高危因素的效能值。
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec 28;15(48):6111-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.6111.