• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艺术领域的慈善事业:地域、捐赠者留存与声望

Philanthropy in art: locality, donor retention, and prestige.

作者信息

Shekhtman Louis Michael, Barabási Albert-László

机构信息

Network Science Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 27;13(1):12157. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38815-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-38815-1
PMID:37500712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10374628/
Abstract

A significant portion of funding for art comes from foundations, representing a key revenue stream for most art organizations. Little is known, however, about the quantitative patterns that govern art funding, limiting the fundraising efficiency of organizations in need of resources, as well as optimal funding allocation of donors. To address these shortcomings, here we relied on the IRS e-file dataset to identify $36B in grants from 46,643 foundations to 48,766 art recipients between 2010 and 2019, allowing us to quantify donor-recipient relationships in art. We find that philanthropic giving is broadly distributed, following a stable power-law distribution, indicating that some funders give considerably and predictably more than others. Giving is highly localized, with 60% of grants and funds going to recipients in the donor's state. Furthermore, donors often support multiple local organizations that offer distinct artforms, rather than advancing a particular subarea within art. Donor retention is strong, with nearly 70% of relationships continuing the next year. Finally, we explored the role of institutional prestige in foundation giving, finding that funding does correlate with prestige, with notable exceptions. Our results present the largest and most comprehensive data-driven exploration of giving by foundations to art to date, unveiling multiple insights that could benefit both donors and recipients.

摘要

艺术领域的一大笔资金来自基金会,这是大多数艺术组织的关键收入来源。然而,对于支配艺术资金的量化模式却知之甚少,这限制了急需资源的组织的筹款效率,以及捐赠者的最优资金分配。为了弥补这些不足,我们在此借助美国国税局的电子申报数据集,确定了2010年至2019年间46,643家基金会向48,766个艺术受赠方提供的360亿美元赠款,从而使我们能够量化艺术领域捐赠者与受赠方之间的关系。我们发现,慈善捐赠分布广泛,遵循稳定的幂律分布,这表明一些资助者的捐赠比其他资助者多得多且可预测。捐赠高度集中,60%的赠款和资金流向了捐赠者所在州的受赠方。此外,捐赠者通常会支持多个提供不同艺术形式的当地组织,而不是推动艺术领域内的某个特定子领域。捐赠者留存率很高,近70%的关系会持续到下一年。最后,我们探讨了机构声望在基金会捐赠中的作用,发现资金确实与声望相关,但也有明显例外。我们的研究结果展示了迄今为止对基金会向艺术领域捐赠进行的规模最大、最全面的数据驱动型探索,揭示了多个可能使捐赠者和受赠方都受益的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/a32bb8f50da1/41598_2023_38815_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/9212c64eb3c9/41598_2023_38815_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/72988fa2ba14/41598_2023_38815_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/c0363b1ecafd/41598_2023_38815_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/79df3b9973f0/41598_2023_38815_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/aa7df9f06377/41598_2023_38815_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/e14418bcaadf/41598_2023_38815_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/45675b6443fb/41598_2023_38815_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/a32bb8f50da1/41598_2023_38815_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/9212c64eb3c9/41598_2023_38815_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/72988fa2ba14/41598_2023_38815_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/c0363b1ecafd/41598_2023_38815_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/79df3b9973f0/41598_2023_38815_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/aa7df9f06377/41598_2023_38815_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/e14418bcaadf/41598_2023_38815_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/45675b6443fb/41598_2023_38815_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d55/10374628/a32bb8f50da1/41598_2023_38815_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Philanthropy in art: locality, donor retention, and prestige.艺术领域的慈善事业:地域、捐赠者留存与声望
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 27;13(1):12157. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38815-1.
2
Mapping philanthropic support of science.绘制科学领域的慈善支持情况。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 24;14(1):9397. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58367-2.
3
Philanthropy funding for neurosurgery research and program development.神经外科学研究和项目发展的慈善资金。
Neurosurgery. 2013 Jul;73(1):177-83. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000429863.50018.f0.
4
Collective philanthropy: describing and modeling the ecology of giving.集体慈善:描述并构建捐赠生态模型。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 1;9(7):e98876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098876. eCollection 2014.
5
Sources and Focus of Health Development Assistance, 1990-2014.1990-2014 年卫生发展援助的来源和重点
JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2359-68. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.5825.
6
Barriers to foundation funding of gay organizations: evidence from Massachusetts.
J Homosex. 2001;42(2):125-45. doi: 10.1300/j082v42n02_07.
7
A landscape of conservation philanthropy for U.S. land trusts.美国土地信托的保护慈善事业全景图。
Conserv Biol. 2019 Feb;33(1):176-184. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13146. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
8
Grateful Client Philanthropy and Veterinary Medicine: Experiences at North Carolina State University.感恩客户慈善事业与兽医学:北卡罗来纳州立大学的经历
Vet Sci. 2019 May 16;6(2):44. doi: 10.3390/vetsci6020044.
9
Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding.慈善事业对确定生物多样性保护资金分配的限制。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Feb;30(1):206-15. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12608. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
10
Lesbian Giving-and Getting.女同性恋的给予与获得。
J Lesbian Stud. 2001;5(3):63-70. doi: 10.1300/J155v05n03_07.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying reputation and success in art.量化艺术中的声誉和成功。
Science. 2018 Nov 16;362(6416):825-829. doi: 10.1126/science.aau7224. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
2
Philanthro-metrics: Mining multi-million-dollar gifts.慈善计量学:挖掘数百万美元的捐赠
PLoS One. 2017 May 26;12(5):e0176738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176738. eCollection 2017.
3
Donor Retention in Online Crowdfunding Communities: A Case Study of DonorsChoose.org.在线众筹社区中的捐赠者留存:以DonorsChoose.org为例的研究
Proc Int World Wide Web Conf. 2015 May;2015:34-44. doi: 10.1145/2736277.2741120.