Morris E W, Di Paola M, Vallance R, Waddell G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Jun;11(5):436-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198606000-00007.
This prospective study of 185 patients undergoing first-time lumbar surgery compared how accurately clinical criteria and water-soluble myelography predicted the operative findings. Clinical diagnostic criteria of nerve root pain, root irritation signs, and neurologic signs of root compression supplemented by myelography were shown to be much more accurate than myelography alone, both in predicting the presence or absence of nerve root involvement and in distinguishing disc prolapse from bony entrapment. Provided the clinical criteria were clearly defined, patients with three or more of the four criteria were usually found to have a disc prolapse while bony entrapment could frequently be identified with one or two criteria. It is concluded that although lumbar disc prolapse is well-recognized, in practice clinical assessment and diagnostic criteria need to be defined more clearly to match increasingly sophisticated radiology.
这项针对185例首次接受腰椎手术患者的前瞻性研究,比较了临床标准和水溶性脊髓造影对手术结果预测的准确性。研究表明,神经根性疼痛、神经根刺激征以及神经根受压的神经体征等临床诊断标准,辅以脊髓造影,在预测神经根受累与否以及区分椎间盘突出与骨质嵌压方面,比单独使用脊髓造影要准确得多。倘若临床标准明确界定,四项标准中具备三项或更多的患者通常被发现存在椎间盘突出,而骨质嵌压往往可通过一两项标准得以识别。研究得出结论,尽管腰椎间盘突出已广为人知,但在实际操作中,临床评估和诊断标准需要更明确地界定,以匹配日益复杂的放射学检查。