• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰的保险公司对遗传信息的歧视:健康专业人员的经验和看法。

Genetic discrimination by insurance companies in Aotearoa New Zealand: experiences and views of health professionals.

机构信息

Genetic Health Service New Zealand - Northern Hub, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.

Genetic Health Service New Zealand - Central Hub, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2023 Apr 28;136(1574):32-52. doi: 10.26635/6965.6116.

DOI:10.26635/6965.6116
PMID:37501230
Abstract

AIMS

Genetic discrimination in insurance is a significant clinical, research and consumer issue. Recently, the Australian life insurance industry introduced a partial moratorium on the use of genetic test results. However, in Aotearoa New Zealand, both life and health insurers can still use genetic results legally to discriminate against applicants. We aimed to document experiences and concerns of New Zealand-based health professionals (HPs) around the potential misuse of genetic test results for insurance purposes.

METHODS

We administered an online survey to New Zealand HPs who discuss genetic testing with patients, their experiences regarding the use of genetic test results in insurance and views on regulation.

RESULTS

Twenty-three New Zealand HPs responded, 15 of whom worked in genetics clinics, representing >60% of the total New Zealand clinical genetics workforce. Eleven respondents reported having patients who experienced adverse outcomes related to insurance based on genetic results. Respondents reported patients sometimes/often delayed (n=11) or refused (n=4) genetic testing due to insurance concerns. Over 80% of those who answered (n=17/21) believe insurers' use of genetic results should be legally regulated.

CONCLUSION

New Zealand HPs have concerns about insurance companies using genetic test results in underwriting, including the effect on patients, and strongly believe government legislation is required.

摘要

目的

保险中的基因歧视是一个重大的临床、研究和消费者问题。最近,澳大利亚寿险业对基因检测结果的使用实行了部分暂停。然而,在新西兰,寿险和健康保险公司仍然可以合法地利用基因结果来歧视申请人。我们旨在记录新西兰卫生专业人员(HPs)在保险目的的基因检测结果潜在滥用方面的经历和担忧。

方法

我们向与患者讨论基因检测的新西兰 HPs 进行了在线调查,了解他们在保险方面使用基因检测结果的经验以及对监管的看法。

结果

23 名新西兰 HPs 做出了回应,其中 15 名在基因诊所工作,代表了新西兰全部临床遗传学工作人员的 60%以上。11 名受访者报告称,有患者因基因结果而在保险方面遭受不利后果。受访者报告称,由于担心保险问题,有些患者有时/经常推迟(n=11)或拒绝(n=4)进行基因检测。超过 80%的回答者(n=17/21)认为,保险公司使用基因结果应该受到法律监管。

结论

新西兰 HPs 对保险公司在承保中使用基因检测结果表示担忧,包括对患者的影响,并强烈认为需要政府立法。

相似文献

1
Genetic discrimination by insurance companies in Aotearoa New Zealand: experiences and views of health professionals.新西兰的保险公司对遗传信息的歧视:健康专业人员的经验和看法。
N Z Med J. 2023 Apr 28;136(1574):32-52. doi: 10.26635/6965.6116.
2
Health professionals' views and experiences of the Australian moratorium on genetic testing and life insurance: A qualitative study.健康专业人士对澳大利亚基因检测和寿险禁令的看法和经验:一项定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Nov;30(11):1262-1268. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01150-6. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
3
A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals' views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium.向前迈进了一步,但仍不够:澳大利亚健康专业人员对遗传学和寿险暂停的看法。
J Med Genet. 2022 Aug;59(8):817-826. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-107989. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
4
Community concerns about genetic discrimination in life insurance persist in Australia: A survey of consumers offered genetic testing.澳大利亚的消费者在提供基因检测后,对寿险中的基因歧视仍存在担忧:一项消费者调查。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Mar;32(3):286-294. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01373-1. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
"Uninsurable because of a genetic test": a qualitative study of consumer views about the use of genetic test results in Australian life insurance.“由于基因测试而无法投保”:一项关于澳大利亚寿险中使用基因测试结果的消费者观点的定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jul;32(7):827-836. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01602-1. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
6
Study protocol: the Australian genetics and life insurance moratorium-monitoring the effectiveness and response (A-GLIMMER) project.研究方案:澳大利亚遗传学与寿险暂缓—监测效果与反应(A-GLIMMER)项目。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 May 21;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00634-2.
7
Genetic testing and insurance in Australia.澳大利亚的基因检测与保险。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2019 Mar;48(3):96-99. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-10-18-4722.
8
Genetic discrimination by Australian insurance companies: a survey of consumer experiences.澳大利亚保险公司的基因歧视:消费者体验调查。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Jan;28(1):108-113. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0426-1. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
9
Genetics and Insurance in Australia: Concerns around a Self-Regulated Industry.澳大利亚的遗传学与保险:对一个自我监管行业的担忧。
Public Health Genomics. 2017;20(4):247-256. doi: 10.1159/000481450. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
10
Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Genetic Testing and Personal Insurance Products in Australia.澳大拉西亚人类遗传学学会立场声明:澳大利亚的基因检测与个人保险产品。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2023 Apr;26(2):184-187. doi: 10.1017/thg.2023.11. Epub 2023 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Future implications of polygenic risk scores for life insurance underwriting.多基因风险评分对人寿保险承保的未来影响。
NPJ Genom Med. 2024 Mar 30;9(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41525-024-00407-x.