Kugai Miyahito, Suyama Takehiro, Kitano Masahiko, Tominaga Yoshiko, Tominaga Shinsuke
Department of Neurosurgery, Tominaga Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Moriguchi, Osaka, Japan.
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2022;16(11):556-564. doi: 10.5797/jnet.cr.2022-0032. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Treatment of large posterior cerebral artery (PCA) aneurysm involving the P1-P2 segment is difficult by both neurosurgery and endovascular treatment. Balloon occlusion test (BOT) to identify precise peripheral collateral flow is difficult prior to parent artery occlusion (PAO). Besides, PAO at the aneurysm at this location can cause peripheral cortical infarction of the occipital and temporal lobes and/or perforator infarction involving the midbrain and thalamus perfused by the perforating artery arising from the P1-P2 segment. However, detection of the perforator during PAO is difficult.
The patient was a 49-year-old woman. At the age of 43 years, a right large PCA aneurysm was discovered in the right P1-P2 segment. A simple technique coiling was performed. As recurrence was identified 1 year later, embolization was performed using a same procedure. Since further recurrences were later found, a third round of treatment was planned. Somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) was recorded as intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring. Tortuosity of the right PCA was observed at the aneurysm neck and the distal right PCA could not be secured. We could neither perform stent-assisted coil embolization nor BOT in the right PCA. Hence, we inflated the balloon in the basilar artery and checked the collateral circulation routes retrograde into the right PCA from the right middle cerebral artery via a leptomeningeal anastomosis. PAO was performed on the right P1-P2 segment at the aneurysm neck. The signal of the SEP was not decreased, and the aneurysm was not visualized. Another coil was added to strengthen the PAO to the right P1 segment, which decreased the SEP amplitude in the extremities by 3 minutes after. As the last coil was thought to be occluding the perforator branching from the right P1 segment, it was removed without detaching. The SEP amplitude began to improve and recovered by 9 minutes after. There was no postoperative deficit. No recurrence of aneurysm was observed on MRA 9 months postoperatively.
During PAO at the P1 segment of large PCA aneurysm involving the P1-P2 segment, SEP may be helpful to prevent perforator infarction, even if perforating artery originating from the proximal portion of the aneurysm was not detected by angiography.
大脑后动脉(PCA)P1 - P2段大型动脉瘤的治疗,无论是神经外科手术还是血管内治疗都颇具难度。在闭塞载瘤动脉(PAO)之前,通过球囊闭塞试验(BOT)来确定精确的外周侧支血流很困难。此外,在此位置对动脉瘤进行PAO可能会导致枕叶和颞叶的外周皮质梗死和/或涉及由P1 - P2段发出的穿支动脉灌注的中脑和丘脑的穿支梗死。然而,在PAO期间检测穿支动脉很困难。
患者为一名49岁女性。43岁时,在右侧P1 - P2段发现一个右侧大型PCA动脉瘤。进行了单纯的弹簧圈栓塞术。1年后发现复发,采用相同方法进行了栓塞。由于后来发现进一步复发,计划进行第三轮治疗。术中记录体感诱发电位(SEP)作为电生理监测。在动脉瘤颈部观察到右侧PCA迂曲,无法固定右侧PCA远端。我们既无法在右侧PCA中进行支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术,也无法进行BOT。因此,我们在基底动脉中充盈球囊,检查通过软脑膜吻合从右侧大脑中动脉逆行进入右侧PCA的侧支循环路径。在动脉瘤颈部的右侧P1 - P2段进行了PAO。SEP信号未降低,动脉瘤未显影。添加了另一个弹簧圈以加强对右侧P1段的PAO,3分钟后肢体SEP波幅降低。由于认为最后一个弹簧圈阻塞了从右侧P1段发出的穿支动脉,未分离就将其取出。SEP波幅开始改善,并在9分钟后恢复。术后无功能缺损。术后9个月的磁共振血管造影(MRA)未观察到动脉瘤复发。
在涉及P1 - P2段的大型PCA动脉瘤的P1段进行PAO期间,即使血管造影未检测到起源于动脉瘤近端部分的穿支动脉,SEP也可能有助于预防穿支梗死。