Fujiwara Satoru, Ohara Nobuyuki, Imamura Hirotoshi, Seo Ryutaro, Nagata Kazuma, Shimizu Hayato, Kawamoto Michi, Kohara Nobuo, Sakai Nobuyuki
Department of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2021;15(11):701-706. doi: 10.5797/jnet.oa.2020-0203. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
Acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in hospitalized patients is relatively rare but important condition. However, unlike community-onset cases, there are only few time-saving protocols for in-hospital LVO. This study aimed to evaluate the time-saving effects of rapid response system (RRS) for the management of in-hospital LVO.
We retrospectively evaluated consecutive in-hospital LVO patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) between April 2015 and January 2020. In November 2017, we added "acute hemiparesis, eye deviation, and convulsive seizures" to the activation criteria for RRS. In this protocol, the patient is immediately transported from the ward to the emergency room (ER) by Medical Emergency Team (MET). The stroke team can then start assessment in the same manner as for community-onset cases. The time metrics between those with and without RRS intervention were compared. The primary outcome was time from detection to the first assessment by stroke team and to initial CT. To investigate the validity of the revised criteria, we also analyzed all RRS-activated cases.
In total, 26 patients (RRS group, 11 patients; non-RRS group, 15 patients) were included. The median time from detection to stroke team assessment (10.0 [interquartile range: IQR, 8-15] minutes vs 65.5 [18-89] minutes) and to CT (22.0 [16-31] minutes vs. 46.5 [35-93] minutes) were significantly shorter in the RRS group. RRS was activated in 34 patients (mean, 1.3/month) according to the added criteria, of whom 20 (58.8%) had cerebral infarction and 9 underwent MT. About two-thirds of the other patients developed neurological emergencies (e.g., epileptic seizure, syncope, or hypoglycemia) that required acute care.
RRS has the potential to shorten response time efficiently in the management of in-hospital LVO. Prompt transportation of the patient to the ER by MET enables faster intervention by the stroke team.
住院患者因大血管闭塞(LVO)导致的急性缺血性卒中相对少见但很重要。然而,与社区发病的病例不同,针对住院LVO的省时方案很少。本研究旨在评估快速反应系统(RRS)对住院LVO管理的省时效果。
我们回顾性评估了2015年4月至2020年1月期间接受机械取栓术(MT)的连续性住院LVO患者。2017年11月,我们在RRS的启动标准中增加了“急性偏瘫、眼球偏斜和惊厥发作”。在此方案中,患者由医疗急救团队(MET)立即从病房转运至急诊室(ER)。然后,卒中团队可以按照与社区发病病例相同的方式开始评估。比较了有和没有RRS干预患者的时间指标。主要结局是从发现到卒中团队首次评估以及到首次CT检查的时间。为了研究修订标准的有效性,我们还分析了所有RRS启动的病例。
总共纳入了26例患者(RRS组11例;非RRS组15例)。RRS组从发现到卒中团队评估的中位时间(10.0[四分位间距:IQR,8 - 15]分钟对65.5[18 - 89]分钟)和到CT检查的时间(22.0[16 - 31]分钟对46.5[35 - 93]分钟)明显更短。根据新增标准,34例患者(平均每月1.3例)启动了RRS,其中20例(58.8%)发生脑梗死,9例接受了MT。其他患者中约三分之二出现了需要紧急护理的神经急症(如癫痫发作、晕厥或低血糖)。
RRS在住院LVO的管理中有可能有效缩短反应时间。MET将患者迅速转运至ER可使卒中团队更快地进行干预。