Çetin Mehmet, Solak Necati, Türk İlteriş, Güreşci Kürşat
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Ömer Halisdemir University Training and Research Hospital, Niğde, Turkey.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sincan State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Thorac Res Pract. 2023 Jan;24(1):34-39. doi: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.22100.
External reporting is frequently used due to the significant increase in computed tomography examinations in recent years and the insufficient number of personnel in internal reporting. We aimed to evaluate the adequacy of outsourcing reporting.
Patients who were seen or hospitalized as a consultation by thoracic surgeons with thoracic computed tomography between January 2021 and January 2022 were included in the study retrospectively. Computed tomography results reported by radiologists working in our hospital were grouped as "internal reports," and the results reported externally by a company were grouped as "outsourcing reports." The total number of computed tomography examinations taken during the same period and the number of examinations reported by a daily average radiologist were also determined. False-negative findings in internal and outsourcing reports were evaluated and statistically compared between groups.
A total of 84 702 computed tomography scans were taken in 2021. In external reporting, 1 physician reported an average of 202.83 computed tomography scans per day (74 033 per year). A total of 350 thorax computed tomography reports were evaluated. A total of 304 (86.9%) thorax computed tomography examinations were reported with external reporting and 46 (13.1%) with internal reporting. False-negative findings other than those reported were found in 81 reports (23.1%). A significantly higher deficiency was observed in external reporting (77/304) compared to internal reporting (4/46). (P = .013).
The effectiveness of external reporting was found to be lower than internal reporting due to a possible lack of communication and audit problems. In order to minimize the errors and related liability arising from external reporting, primarily a legal standardization is required with realistic reporting numbers of external reporting.
由于近年来计算机断层扫描检查显著增加且内部报告人员不足,外部报告的使用频率颇高。我们旨在评估外包报告的充分性。
回顾性纳入2021年1月至2022年1月间因胸外科医生会诊而行胸部计算机断层扫描的就诊或住院患者。我院放射科医生报告的计算机断层扫描结果归为“内部报告”,由一家公司外部报告的结果归为“外包报告”。还确定了同期进行的计算机断层扫描检查总数以及日均放射科医生报告的检查数量。评估内部和外包报告中的假阴性结果,并在组间进行统计学比较。
2021年共进行了84702次计算机断层扫描。在外部报告中,1名医生平均每天报告202.83次计算机断层扫描(每年74033次)。共评估了350份胸部计算机断层扫描报告。共有304份(86.9%)胸部计算机断层扫描检查采用外部报告,46份(13.1%)采用内部报告。在81份报告(23.1%)中发现了报告之外的假阴性结果。与内部报告(4/46)相比,外部报告(77/304)中观察到的缺陷明显更高(P = .013)。
由于可能存在沟通和审核问题,发现外部报告的有效性低于内部报告。为了尽量减少外部报告产生的错误和相关责任,首先需要对外部报告的实际报告数量进行法律规范。