Choudhary Manoj, Minsavage Gerald V, Goss Erica M, Timilsina Sujan, Coutinho Teresa A, Vallad Gary E, Paret Mathews L, Jones Jeffrey B
Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Wimauma, FL 33598.
Phytopathology. 2024 Jan;114(1):47-60. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-23-0150-R. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
spp. infect a wide range of annual and perennial plants. Bacterial blight in young seedlings of spp. in Indonesia was originally identified as . However, these strains failed to elicit a hypersensitive response (HR) on either tomatoes or peppers. Two of the strains, EPK43 and BCC 972, when infiltrated into tomato and pepper leaves, failed to grow to significant levels in comparison with well-characterized pv. () strains. Furthermore, spray inoculation of 'Bonny Best' tomato plants with a bacterial suspension of the strains resulted in no obvious symptoms. We sequenced the whole genomes of eight strains isolated from two species between 2007 and 2015. The strains had average nucleotide identities (ANIs) of at least 97.8 with and pv. () strains, both of which are causal agents of bacterial spot of tomatoes and peppers. A comparison of the strains revealed that the ANI values were >99.99% with each other. Core genome phylogeny clustered all strains with pv. . They formed separate clades, which included pv. , pv. , and pv. . Based on ANI, phylogenetic relationships, and pathogenicity, we designated these strains as pv. (). Comparative analysis of sequenced strains provided unique profiles of type III secretion effectors. Core effector XopD, present in all pathogenic and strains, was absent in the strains. Comparison of the hrp clusters of , , and genomes revealed that HrpE in strains was very different from that in and . To determine if it was functional, we deleted the gene and complemented with the , confirming it was essential for secretion of type III effectors. HrpE has a hypervariable N-terminus in spp., in which the N-terminus of strains differs significantly from those of and strains.
某属感染多种一年生和多年生植物。印度尼西亚某属幼苗上的细菌性叶枯病最初被鉴定为……。然而,这些菌株在番茄或辣椒上均未引发过敏反应(HR)。其中两个菌株,EPK43和BCC 972,当浸润到番茄和辣椒叶片中时,与特征明确的……致病变种(……)菌株相比,未能生长到显著水平。此外,用该属菌株的细菌悬液喷雾接种“邦尼最佳”番茄植株未产生明显症状。我们对2007年至2015年间从两个某属物种中分离出的八个菌株进行了全基因组测序。这些菌株与……致病变种(……)菌株以及……致病变种(……)菌株的平均核苷酸同一性(ANI)至少为97.8%,这两个菌株均是番茄和辣椒细菌性斑点病的病原体。对该属菌株的比较显示,它们彼此之间的ANI值>99.99%。核心基因组系统发育分析将所有该属菌株与……致病变种(……)聚类在一起。它们形成了单独的分支,其中包括……致病变种(……)、……致病变种(……)和……致病变种(……)。基于ANI、系统发育关系和致病性,我们将这些该属菌株指定为……致病变种(……)。对测序菌株的比较分析提供了III型分泌效应子的独特图谱。所有致病的……和……菌株中存在的核心效应子XopD在该属菌株中不存在。对……、……和……基因组的hrp簇比较显示,该属菌株中的HrpE与……和……中的HrpE非常不同。为了确定其是否具有功能,我们删除了该基因并用……进行互补,证实它对于III型效应子的分泌至关重要。在某属物种中,HrpE的N端具有高变区,其中该属菌株的N端与……和……菌株的N端有显著差异。