University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(10):6152-6158. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13901-w. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
To determine the feasibility and acceptability of using a patient decision aid (DA) for women with elevated breast cancer risk who are considering MRI screening.
This pilot study employed a mixed methods design to develop, modify, and test an interactive DA. The DA was administered among a consecutive patient sample with an estimated Tyrer-Cuzick v.8 lifetime breast cancer risk of 20% or greater and without a pathologic genetic mutation. The decisional conflict scale was used to measure decisional conflict. Post-intervention provider and patient feedback evaluated shared decision-making, feasibility, and acceptability.
Twenty-four patients participated, with a median age of 44 years. Prior to DA use, sixteen patients (67%) were unsure whether to add MRI to their screening, six patients elected MRI (25%), and two patients declined MRI (8%). Following DA use, thirteen of sixteen of the initially undecided participants (81%) established a preference, with eleven electing to add MRI screening. Of participants with an initial preference, all maintained the same decision following use of the DA. Prior to the DA, the median decisional conflict score among participants was 25% (range 0-60%) compared with 0% (range 0-25%) after the DA. Healthcare providers reported that the DA was useful and easily incorporated into clinical workflow.
This pilot study shows that there may be a benefit to DA utilization in the high-risk breast cancer clinic to guide shared decision-making in establishing a screening preference. The findings warrant further research to test the use of the DA in a larger, multi-site trial.
确定使用患者决策辅助工具(DA)对考虑 MRI 筛查的乳腺癌风险升高的女性的可行性和可接受性。
本试点研究采用混合方法设计,开发、修改和测试了一个互动性的 DA。该 DA 在连续的患者样本中进行,这些患者估计 Tyrer-Cuzick v.8 终生乳腺癌风险为 20%或更高,且没有病理性基因突变。使用决策冲突量表来衡量决策冲突。干预后,提供者和患者的反馈评估了共同决策、可行性和可接受性。
24 名患者参与了研究,中位年龄为 44 岁。在使用 DA 之前,16 名患者(67%)不确定是否要将 MRI 添加到他们的筛查中,6 名患者选择了 MRI(25%),2 名患者拒绝了 MRI(8%)。在使用 DA 后,最初未做出决定的 16 名患者中的 13 名(81%)确立了偏好,其中 11 名选择添加 MRI 筛查。在有初始偏好的参与者中,所有人在使用 DA 后都维持了相同的决定。在 DA 使用之前,参与者的决策冲突中位数为 25%(范围 0-60%),而在 DA 使用后为 0%(范围 0-25%)。医疗保健提供者报告说,DA 很有用,并且可以轻松地融入临床工作流程。
本试点研究表明,在高风险乳腺癌诊所中使用 DA 可能有助于指导共同决策,以确立筛查偏好。这些发现需要进一步研究,以在更大的多站点试验中测试 DA 的使用。