• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

STEMI 后目标血管与非目标血管失败对 10 年预后的影响。EXAMINATION-EXTEND 试验的见解。

Ten-year prognostic impact of target versus non-target vessel failure after STEMI. Insight from the EXAMINATION-EXTEND trial.

机构信息

Institut Clínic Cardiovascular, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Cardiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy.

Institut Clínic Cardiovascular, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; 3rd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2024 Mar;77(3):215-225. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.rec.2023.07.001
PMID:37506972
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

After ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI), the impact of different adverse events on prognosis remains unknown. We aimed to assess very long-term predictors of patient-oriented composite endpoints (POCE) and investigate whether the occurrence of target vessel failure (TVF) vs a non-TVF event as the first event could potentially influence subsequent outcomes.

METHODS

The EXAMINATION-EXTEND trial randomized STEMI patients to receive either an everolimus-eluting stent or a bare-metal stent. The follow-up period was 10 years. Predictors of POCE (a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization) were evaluated in the overall study population. The patients were stratified based on the type of first event (TVF-first vs non-TVF-first) and were compared in terms of subsequent POCE. TVF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, TV myocardial infarction, or TV revascularization.

RESULTS

Out of the 1498 enrolled patients, 529 (35.3%) experienced a POCE during the 10-year follow-up. Independent predictors of POCE were age, diabetes mellitus, previous myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, and multivessel coronary disease. The first event was a TVF in 296 patients and was a non-TVF in 233 patients. No significant differences were observed between TVF-first and non-TVF-first patients in terms of subsequent POCE (21.7% vs 39.3%, time ratio 1.79; 95%CI, 0.87-3.67;P=.12) or its individual components.

CONCLUSIONS

At the 10-year follow-up, approximately one-third of STEMI patients had experienced at least 1 POCE. Independent predictors of these events were age, diabetes, and more extensive atherosclerotic disease. The occurrence of a TVF or a non-TVF as the first event did not seem to influence subsequent outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04462315.

摘要

简介和目的

在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后,不同不良事件对预后的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在评估患者导向复合终点(POCE)的非常长期预测因素,并探讨首次事件中靶血管失败(TVF)与非-TVF 事件的发生是否可能影响随后的结局。

方法

EXAMINATION-EXTEND 试验将 STEMI 患者随机分为接受依维莫司洗脱支架或裸金属支架治疗。随访时间为 10 年。在整个研究人群中评估 POCE(全因死亡、任何心肌梗死或任何血运重建的复合终点)的预测因素。根据首次事件的类型(TVF 首发与非-TVF 首发)对患者进行分层,并比较随后 POCE 的差异。TVF 定义为心脏死亡、TV 心肌梗死或 TV 血运重建的复合终点。

结果

在纳入的 1498 例患者中,529 例(35.3%)在 10 年随访期间发生 POCE。POCE 的独立预测因素为年龄、糖尿病、既往心肌梗死、外周动脉疾病和多支血管性冠状动脉疾病。296 例患者的首发事件为 TVF,233 例患者的首发事件为非-TVF。在随后的 POCE 方面,TVF 首发和非-TVF 首发患者之间无显著差异(21.7%与 39.3%,时间比 1.79;95%CI,0.87-3.67;P=.12)或其各组成部分。

结论

在 10 年随访时,约三分之一的 STEMI 患者至少发生了 1 次 POCE。这些事件的独立预测因素为年龄、糖尿病和更广泛的动脉粥样硬化性疾病。首次发生 TVF 或非-TVF 似乎并不影响随后的结局。

临床试验注册号

NCT04462315。

相似文献

1
Ten-year prognostic impact of target versus non-target vessel failure after STEMI. Insight from the EXAMINATION-EXTEND trial.STEMI 后目标血管与非目标血管失败对 10 年预后的影响。EXAMINATION-EXTEND 试验的见解。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2024 Mar;77(3):215-225. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
2
Comparison of newer-generation drug-eluting with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of the EXAMINATION (clinical Evaluation of the Xience-V stent in Acute Myocardial INfArcTION) and COMFORTABLE-AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trials.比较新一代药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:EXAMINATION(急性心肌梗死中评价 Xience-V 支架的临床研究)和 COMFORTABLE-AMI(急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中生物可降解涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较研究)试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
3
10-Year Follow-Up of Patients With Everolimus-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者采用依维莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架 10 年随访结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 9;77(9):1165-1178. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.059.
4
Outcome After Myocardial Infarction Treated With Resolute Integrity and Promus Element Stents: Insights From the DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) Randomized Trial.使用Resolute Integrity和Promus Element支架治疗心肌梗死后的结果:来自荷兰PEERS(特温特II)随机试验的见解。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016 Dec;69(12):1152-1159. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.05.029. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
5
Everolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent in elderly (≥75 years) versus non-elderly (<75 years) patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the examination trial.依维莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于≥75岁及<75岁ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:EXAMINATION试验的见解
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 20;179:73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.038. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
6
Impact of diabetes on the benefits from everolimus-eluting stent as compared to first-generation drug-eluting stent in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.糖尿病对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者使用依维莫司洗脱支架与第一代药物洗脱支架相比所获益处的影响。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2015 Sep;12(5):306-14. doi: 10.1177/1479164115592252. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
7
Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.与含有不可降解聚合物的西罗莫司洗脱支架相比,含可生物降解聚合物的比伐卢定洗脱支架在冠状动脉疾病患者中具有更好的安全性和降低支架血栓形成的风险:LEADERS(雷帕霉素从不可降解到可降解涂层支架洗脱)随机、非劣效性试验的最终 5 年报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug;6(8):777-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.011.
8
The EXAMINATION trial (Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction): 2-year results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial.EXAMINATION 试验(依维莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的比较):一项多中心随机对照临床试验的 2 年结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
9
Sex Differences in 10-Year Outcomes Following STEMI: A Subanalysis From the EXAMINATION-EXTEND Trial.ST段抬高型心肌梗死10年预后的性别差异:EXAMINATION-EXTEND试验的亚组分析
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Oct 10;15(19):1965-1973. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.07.038. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
10
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:倾向评分匹配比较的 1 年结果:BVS-EXAMINATION 研究(生物可吸收血管支架——依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.005.