Palmas Francesco, Casula Paolo, Curreli Francesco, Podda Cinzia, Cabiddu Serenella, Sabatini Andrea
Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, Via Fiorelli 1, 09126 Cagliari, Italy.
Agenzia Forestas, Servizio Tecnico, Viale Merello 86, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.
Biology (Basel). 2023 Jul 13;12(7):1000. doi: 10.3390/biology12071000.
Monitoring the conservation status of endangered freshwater fish using less invasive methods poses challenges for ecologists and conservationists. Visual surveys have been proposed as an alternative to electrofishing, which is a standard methodology that can cause injuries, physiological stress and post-release mortality in organisms. To test the efficacy of visual methods, a study was conducted in an intermittent stream of Sardinia (Italy). Two visual methods were employed: a visual survey from streambanks (VSS) and an underwater visual survey (UVS) using cameras. The aims of this study were (1) to compare the effectiveness of these methods in detecting patch occupancy patterns and (2) to investigate the effect of environmental variables on the detection probability of Mediterranean native trout. Environmental variables characterizing pool habitats were recorded, and generalized linear models (GLMs) were employed to assess the correlation between these variables and trout presence/absence. GLM analysis revealed that UVS had higher detection probability with larger pool volume, whereas submerged macrophytes negatively affected detection probability. Detection from streambanks (VVS) was negatively affected by a high turbulence rate. In conclusion, our study suggests the utility of visual methods to describe patterns of patch occupancy of Mediterranean trout. However, methods can be differently affected by environmental variables. Therefore, monitoring programs using these methods should consider these factors to ensure a reliable description of within-stream trout distribution in intermittent streams.
使用侵入性较小的方法监测濒危淡水鱼的保护状况给生态学家和保护主义者带来了挑战。视觉调查已被提议作为电捕鱼的替代方法,电捕鱼是一种标准方法,可能会对生物造成伤害、生理压力和放归后死亡率。为了测试视觉方法的有效性,在意大利撒丁岛的一条间歇性溪流中进行了一项研究。采用了两种视觉方法:从河岸进行的视觉调查(VSS)和使用相机的水下视觉调查(UVS)。本研究的目的是:(1)比较这些方法在检测斑块占用模式方面的有效性;(2)调查环境变量对地中海本土鳟鱼检测概率的影响。记录了表征水塘栖息地的环境变量,并使用广义线性模型(GLM)评估这些变量与鳟鱼存在与否之间的相关性。GLM分析表明,UVS在水塘体积较大时检测概率较高,而沉水植物对检测概率有负面影响。从河岸进行的检测(VVS)受到高湍流率的负面影响。总之,我们的研究表明视觉方法在描述地中海鳟鱼斑块占用模式方面的实用性。然而,这些方法可能会受到环境变量的不同影响。因此,使用这些方法的监测计划应考虑这些因素,以确保对间歇性溪流中溪流内鳟鱼分布进行可靠描述。