School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, NG11 8NS, UK.
Environment Agency of England, Spalding, PE11 1DA, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Mar 15;618:1096-1113. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.137. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
Intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (IRES) are common across Europe and dominate some Mediterranean river networks. In all climate zones, IRES support high biodiversity and provide ecosystem services. As dynamic ecosystems that transition between flowing, pool, and dry states, IRES are typically poorly represented in biomonitoring programmes implemented to characterize EU Water Framework Directive ecological status. We report the results of a survey completed by representatives from 20 European countries to identify current challenges to IRES status assessment, examples of best practice, and priorities for future research. We identify five major barriers to effective ecological status classification in IRES: 1. the exclusion of IRES from Water Framework Directive biomonitoring based on their small catchment size; 2. the lack of river typologies that distinguish between contrasting IRES; 3. difficulties in defining the 'reference conditions' that represent unimpacted dynamic ecosystems; 4. classification of IRES ecological status based on lotic communities sampled using methods developed for perennial rivers; and 5. a reliance on taxonomic characterization of local communities. Despite these challenges, we recognize examples of innovative practice that can inform modification of current biomonitoring activity to promote effective IRES status classification. Priorities for future research include reconceptualization of the reference condition approach to accommodate spatiotemporal fluctuations in community composition, and modification of indices of ecosystem health to recognize both taxon-specific sensitivities to intermittence and dispersal abilities, within a landscape context.
间歇性河流和短暂河流(IRES)在欧洲很常见,并且主导着一些地中海河流网络。在所有气候带中,IRES 都支持着高生物多样性并提供生态系统服务。作为在流动、水池和干燥状态之间转换的动态生态系统,IRES 在为了描述欧盟水框架指令生态状况而实施的生物监测计划中通常代表性不足。我们报告了来自 20 个欧洲国家的代表完成的一项调查的结果,以确定 IRES 状况评估的当前挑战、最佳实践的示例以及未来研究的重点。我们确定了五个主要的障碍,这些障碍会影响 IRES 进行有效生态状况分类:1. 由于其小流域面积而将 IRES 排除在水框架指令生物监测之外;2. 缺乏区分不同 IRES 的河流类型学;3. 难以定义代表未受影响的动态生态系统的“参考条件”;4. 根据针对常年河流开发的方法对 IRES 生态状况进行分类;5. 依赖于对当地社区进行分类学特征描述。尽管存在这些挑战,但我们还是认识到一些创新实践的例子,这些例子可以为修改当前的生物监测活动提供信息,以促进有效的 IRES 状况分类。未来研究的重点包括重新概念化参考条件方法,以适应群落组成的时空波动,以及修改生态系统健康指数,以在景观背景下既认识到分类单元对间歇性和扩散能力的特异性敏感性,又认识到分类单元对间歇性和扩散能力的特异性敏感性。