• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于血流动力学性能的主-髂血管重建术中分叉移植物尺寸的选择

Selection of Bifurcated Grafts' Dimensions during Aorto-Iliac Vascular Reconstruction Based on Their Hemodynamic Performance.

作者信息

Tzirakis Konstantinos, Kamarianakis Yiannis, Kontopodis Nikolaos, Ioannou Christos V

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

Data Science Group, Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, 70013 Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

出版信息

Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;10(7):776. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10070776.

DOI:10.3390/bioengineering10070776
PMID:37508803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10376214/
Abstract

During the vascular surgical reconstruction of aorto-iliac occlusive/aneurysmal disease, bifurcated grafts are used where vascular surgeons intra-operatively select the size and the relative lengths of the parent and daughter portions of the graft. Currently, clinical practice regarding the selection of the most favorable geometric configuration of the graft is an understudied research subject: decisions are solely based on the clinical experience of the operating surgeon. This manuscript aims to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of various diameters, D, of bifurcated aortic grafts and relate those with proximal/distal part length ratios (the angle φ between the limbs is used as a surrogate marker of the main body-to-limb length ratio) in order to provide insights regarding the effects of different geometries on the hemodynamic environment. To this end, a computationally intensive set of simulations is conducted, and the resulting data are analyzed with modern statistical regression tools. A negative curvilinear relationship of TAWSS with both φ and D is recorded. It is shown that the angle between limbs is a more important predictor for the variability of TAWSS, while the graft's diameter is an important determinant for the variability of OSI. Large percentages of the total graft area with TAWSS < 0.4 Pa, which correspond to thrombogenic stimulating environments, are only observed for large values of φ and D > 20 mm. This variable ranges from 10% (for the smallest values of φ and D) to 55% (for the largest φ and D values). Our findings suggest that grafts with the smallest possible angle between the limbs (i.e., smallest parent-to-daughter length ratio) present the most favorable hemodynamic performance, yielding the smallest percentage of total graft area under thrombogenic simulating environments. Similarly, grafts with the smallest acceptable diameter should be preferred for the same reason. Especially, grafts with diameters greater than 20 mm should be avoided, given the abrupt increase in estimated thrombogenic areas.

摘要

在腹主动脉-髂动脉闭塞性/动脉瘤性疾病的血管外科重建手术中,使用分叉移植物,血管外科医生在手术中选择移植物母支和子支的尺寸及相对长度。目前,关于选择移植物最有利几何构型的临床实践是一个研究不足的课题:决策仅基于主刀医生的临床经验。本手稿旨在评估不同直径(D)的分叉主动脉移植物的血流动力学性能,并将其与近端/远端部分长度比相关联(肢体之间的角度φ用作主体与肢体长度比的替代指标),以便深入了解不同几何形状对血流动力学环境的影响。为此,进行了一组计算密集型模拟,并使用现代统计回归工具对所得数据进行分析。记录了壁面切应力(TAWSS)与φ和D均呈负曲线关系。结果表明,肢体之间的角度是TAWSS变异性的更重要预测因素,而移植物直径是振荡剪切指数(OSI)变异性的重要决定因素。仅在φ值较大且D>20 mm时,才观察到壁面切应力<0.4 Pa的移植物总面积的很大百分比,这对应于血栓形成刺激环境。该变量范围从10%(对于最小的φ和D值)到55%(对于最大的φ和D值)。我们的研究结果表明,肢体之间角度尽可能小的移植物(即最小的母支与子支长度比)具有最有利的血流动力学性能,在血栓形成模拟环境下产生的移植物总面积百分比最小。同样,出于相同原因,应首选可接受直径最小的移植物。特别是,鉴于估计的血栓形成区域会突然增加,应避免使用直径大于20 mm的移植物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/448b040dbee5/bioengineering-10-00776-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/07da0c1889a4/bioengineering-10-00776-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/31e49004dc9d/bioengineering-10-00776-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/6313b15c4ee9/bioengineering-10-00776-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/46b0abc9779a/bioengineering-10-00776-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/511aa879e187/bioengineering-10-00776-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/b7fa33202be6/bioengineering-10-00776-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/86229abf687e/bioengineering-10-00776-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/51cd954adda7/bioengineering-10-00776-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/1ab11ec5daf1/bioengineering-10-00776-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/d8839d61dad0/bioengineering-10-00776-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/448b040dbee5/bioengineering-10-00776-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/07da0c1889a4/bioengineering-10-00776-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/31e49004dc9d/bioengineering-10-00776-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/6313b15c4ee9/bioengineering-10-00776-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/46b0abc9779a/bioengineering-10-00776-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/511aa879e187/bioengineering-10-00776-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/b7fa33202be6/bioengineering-10-00776-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/86229abf687e/bioengineering-10-00776-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/51cd954adda7/bioengineering-10-00776-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/1ab11ec5daf1/bioengineering-10-00776-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/d8839d61dad0/bioengineering-10-00776-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/11f6/10376214/448b040dbee5/bioengineering-10-00776-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Selection of Bifurcated Grafts' Dimensions during Aorto-Iliac Vascular Reconstruction Based on Their Hemodynamic Performance.基于血流动力学性能的主-髂血管重建术中分叉移植物尺寸的选择
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;10(7):776. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10070776.
2
Should the Proximal Part of a Bifurcated Aortic Graft be Kept as Short as Possible? A Computational Study Elucidates on Aortic Graft Hemodynamics for Various Main Body Lengths.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Aug;84:344-353. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.12.014. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
3
Effect of Sac Asymmetry, Neck and Iliac Angle on the Hemodynamic Behavior of Idealized Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Geometries.节段性不对称、颈部和髂嵴角对理想化腹主动脉瘤几何形状血流动力学行为的影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jul;93:338-350. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.02.026. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
4
[Factors determining late patency of aortobifemoral bypass graft].[决定主-双股动脉旁路移植术远期通畅率的因素]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1997 Jan-Feb;125(1-2):24-35.
5
Endovascular treatment of aneurysms using fenestrated-branched endografts with distal inverted iliac limbs.使用带有远端倒置髂支的开窗分支型腔内移植物对动脉瘤进行血管内治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):600-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.058.
6
Predicting iliac limb occlusions after bifurcated aortic stent grafting: anatomic and device-related causes.预测分叉型主动脉覆膜支架植入术后髂支闭塞:解剖学及与器械相关的原因
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Oct;36(4):679-84.
7
Computational Comparison Between a Classic Bifurcated Endograft and a Customized Model With "Dog Bone"-Shaped Limbs.经典分叉型血管内移植物与“狗骨”型分支血管的定制模型的计算比较。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Apr;26(2):250-257. doi: 10.1177/1526602819834713.
8
Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with narrow aortas using bifurcated stent grafts is safe and effective.对于主动脉狭窄患者,使用分叉型覆膜支架进行血管腔内主动脉瘤修复是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1140-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.050. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
9
Computational Comparison between the Altura Aortic Endograft Configuration and the Classic Bifurcated Idealized Designs.Altura主动脉内移植物构型与经典分叉理想化设计之间的计算比较。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;68:442-450. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.03.043. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
10
Estimating the hemodynamic influence of variable main body-to-iliac limb length ratios in aortic endografts.评估主动脉腔内移植物中主体与髂支长度比值变化对血流动力学的影响。
Int Angiol. 2018 Feb;37(1):41-45. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.17.03883-4. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Blood Rheology and Inlet Boundary Conditions on Realistic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms under Pulsatile Flow Conditions.脉动血流条件下血液流变学和入口边界条件对真实腹主动脉瘤的影响
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Feb 20;10(2):272. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020272.
2
Patient-specific changes in aortic hemodynamics is associated with thrombotic risk after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair with large diameter endografts.在使用大直径血管内移植物进行开窗式血管内动脉瘤修复术后,患者特异性的主动脉血流动力学变化与血栓形成风险相关。
JVS Vasc Sci. 2022 Apr 21;3:219-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jvssci.2022.04.002. eCollection 2022.
3
Should the Proximal Part of a Bifurcated Aortic Graft be Kept as Short as Possible? A Computational Study Elucidates on Aortic Graft Hemodynamics for Various Main Body Lengths.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Aug;84:344-353. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.12.014. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Long-term results of endovascular intervention with unibody bifurcation endograft for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm management.一体式分支型腹主动脉瘤覆膜支架腔内修复术治疗择期腹主动脉瘤的长期结果。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 30;22(2):453-459. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2202051.
5
Hemodynamic Parameters Predict In-stent Thrombosis After Multibranched Endovascular Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Retrospective Study of Branched Stent-Graft Thrombosis.血流动力学参数预测复杂腹主动脉瘤多分支血管腔内修复术后支架内血栓形成:分支型覆膜支架血栓形成的回顾性研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Apr 23;8:654412. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.654412. eCollection 2021.
6
An update on the ovation abdominal stent graft for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: current evidence and future perspectives.腹主动脉瘤治疗用 Ovation 腹主动脉覆膜支架的最新进展:当前证据与未来展望。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Dec;17(12):1249-1256. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1848539. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
7
An update on the improvement of patient eligibility with the use of new generation endografts for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.新一代内脏支架在治疗腹主动脉瘤中提高患者适应性的研究进展。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Nov;17(11):1231-1238. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1841629. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
8
Effect of bifurcation in the hemodynamic changes and rupture risk of small intracranial aneurysm.分叉对颅内小动脉瘤血流动力学变化和破裂风险的影响。
Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Jun;44(3):1703-1712. doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01367-3. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
9
Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
10
Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms.编辑推荐——欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2019年腹主动脉-髂动脉瘤管理临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;57(1):8-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Dec 5.