• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对使用新开发的“患者就诊医生指南”的看法:DocVISITguide。

Patients' Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed "Patients' Guide for Doctor's Visit": DocVISITguide.

机构信息

Careum Center for Health Literacy, Careum Foundation, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

Careum School of Health, Kalaidos University of Applied Sciences, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;20(14):6414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146414.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20146414
PMID:37510646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10379287/
Abstract

During doctor's visits, fundamental decisions regarding a patient's diagnosis and therapy are taken. However, consultations often take place within a limited time frame and are characterized by an asymmetric interaction. Therefore, patients' questions can remain unanswered and concerns unspoken. A "Patients' Guide for Doctor's Visit" (DocVISITguide) was developed to prepare patients for their visits, supporting them to take an active role in the communication and leave the consultation well-informed. This paper describes the development of the DocVISITguide and its first small-scale evaluation based on a sequential explanatory mixed methods design from the patients' perspective. For this purpose, a small sample of patients completed a pre- and post-questionnaire, and two in-depth interviews were conducted. Most participants found the DocVISITguide easy to understand. The guide helped them to take a closer look at their own health situation and be better prepared for the visit. More than three-quarters (82%) of the participants would probably use the guide again, and all (100%) would recommend it to family and friends. However, some patients felt unsure about using the guide within the consultation and showing it to their physician. To counteract this uncertainty, physicians should be actively involved in the use of such guides in the future.

摘要

在医生就诊期间,会做出关于患者诊断和治疗的基本决策。然而,咨询往往在有限的时间内进行,并且具有不对称的交互作用。因此,患者的问题可能得不到回答,他们的担忧也可能无法表达。为了让患者做好就诊准备,帮助他们在交流中积极参与并让他们在咨询后充分了解情况,我们开发了一款名为“患者就诊指南”(DocVISITguide)的工具。本研究采用从患者角度出发的顺序解释性混合方法设计,描述了 DocVISITguide 的开发过程及其首次小规模评估结果。为此,我们选取了一小部分患者完成了一份预调查问卷和一份后调查问卷,并进行了两次深入访谈。大多数参与者认为 DocVISITguide 易于理解。该指南帮助他们更仔细地审视自己的健康状况,并为就诊做好更充分的准备。超过四分之三(82%)的参与者可能会再次使用该指南,并且所有人(100%)都会向家人和朋友推荐该指南。然而,一些患者在就诊期间使用该指南并向医生展示该指南时感到不确定。为了消除这种不确定性,未来医生应该积极参与此类指南的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a5/10379287/d71ded6e88fd/ijerph-20-06414-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a5/10379287/1373f185b13f/ijerph-20-06414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a5/10379287/3348fb3140fd/ijerph-20-06414-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a5/10379287/f37e5f009e94/ijerph-20-06414-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a5/10379287/9409a14e5300/ijerph-20-06414-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a5/10379287/d71ded6e88fd/ijerph-20-06414-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a5/10379287/1373f185b13f/ijerph-20-06414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a5/10379287/3348fb3140fd/ijerph-20-06414-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a5/10379287/f37e5f009e94/ijerph-20-06414-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a5/10379287/9409a14e5300/ijerph-20-06414-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a5/10379287/d71ded6e88fd/ijerph-20-06414-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' Perspectives on the Use of a Newly Developed "Patients' Guide for Doctor's Visit": DocVISITguide.患者对使用新开发的“患者就诊医生指南”的看法:DocVISITguide。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;20(14):6414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146414.
2
Do not judge according to appearance: patients' preference of a doctor's face does not influence their assessment of the patient-doctor relationship.不要以貌取人:患者对医生容貌的偏好并不会影响他们对医患关系的评价。
Acupunct Med. 2012 Dec;30(4):261-5. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2012-010164. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
3
A tool to strengthen the older patient-companion partnership in primary care: results from a pilot study.一种增强初级保健中老年患者-同伴伙伴关系的工具:一项试点研究的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Feb;62(2):312-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12639. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
4
The choice is yours? How women with ovarian cancer make sense of treatment choices.选择权在你?卵巢癌女性如何理解治疗选择。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):361-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.014. Epub 2006 Jul 28.
5
The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.患者对医疗保健期望的测量:对患者期望测量的综述和心理测量学测试。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Jul;16(30):i-xii, 1-509. doi: 10.3310/hta16300.
6
How well do doctors know their patients? Factors affecting physician understanding of patients' health beliefs.医生对患者了解多少?影响医生理解患者健康信念的因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan;26(1):21-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1453-3. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
7
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
8
Doctors' consultations with children and their parents: a model of competencies, outcomes and confounding influences.医生与儿童及其家长的会诊:能力、结果及混杂影响的模型
Med Educ. 2005 Aug;39(8):807-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02231.x.
9
Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries.全科医疗中的会诊时长:六个欧洲国家的横断面研究。
BMJ. 2002 Aug 31;325(7362):472. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7362.472.
10
Doctor-patient communication and cancer patients' quality of life and satisfaction.医患沟通与癌症患者的生活质量及满意度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Sep;41(2):145-56. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00108-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Question prompt lists and endorsement of question-asking support patients to get the information they seek-A longitudinal qualitative study.问题提示清单和对提问支持的认可可帮助患者获取他们所寻求的信息——一项纵向定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1652-1663. doi: 10.1111/hex.13509. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
2
Tool to improve patient-provider interactions in adult primary care: Randomized controlled pilot study.改善成人初级保健中医患互动的工具:随机对照试点研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Feb;68(2):e49-e58. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6802e49.
3
Health and social behaviour through pandemic phases in Switzerland: Regional time-trends of the COVID-19 Social Monitor panel study.
瑞士大流行各阶段的健康和社会行为:COVID-19 社会监测面板研究的区域时间趋势。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0256253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256253. eCollection 2021.
4
Patient participation in shared decision-making in palliative care - an integrative review.患者在姑息治疗中的共同决策参与 - 综合评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Dec;30(23-24):3415-3428. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15866. Epub 2021 May 24.
5
Things left unsaid: important topics that are not discussed between patients with systemic sclerosis, their carers and their healthcare professionals-a discourse analysis.未言明之事:系统性硬化症患者、其照护者和医疗保健专业人员之间未讨论的重要议题——话语分析。
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Apr;40(4):1399-1407. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05371-2. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
6
Time Pressure During Primary Care Office Visits: a Prospective Evaluation of Data from the Healthy Work Place Study.初级保健门诊就诊期间的时间压力:来自健康工作场所研究数据的前瞻性评估
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Feb;35(2):465-472. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05343-6. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
7
Organizing Care for Patients With Chronic Illness Revisited.再次审视慢性病患者的护理组织工作。
Milbank Q. 2019 Sep;97(3):659-664. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12416. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
Health Literacy Competencies for European Health Care Personnel.欧洲医护人员的健康素养能力
Health Lit Res Pract. 2017 Dec 11;1(4):e247-e256. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20171005-01. eCollection 2017 Oct.
9
Miscommunication in Doctor-Patient Communication.医患沟通中的误解。
Top Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;10(2):409-424. doi: 10.1111/tops.12337.
10
How to practice person-centred care: A conceptual framework.如何实践以患者为中心的护理:概念框架。
Health Expect. 2018 Apr;21(2):429-440. doi: 10.1111/hex.12640. Epub 2017 Nov 19.