• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康个体白天被动抬腿试验中血流动力学反应的差异:血容量正常的问题。

Differences in Hemodynamic Response to Passive Leg Raising Tests during the Day in Healthy Individuals: The Question of Normovolemia.

作者信息

Pranskunas Andrius, Gulbinaite Egle, Navickaite Aiste, Pranskuniene Zivile

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Eiveniu g. 2, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania.

Faculty of Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus g. 9, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;13(7):1606. doi: 10.3390/life13071606.

DOI:10.3390/life13071606
PMID:37511981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10381249/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The passive leg-raising (PLR) test was developed to predict fluid responsiveness and reduce fluid overload. However, the hemodynamic response of healthy individuals to the PLR test and how it changes during the day, between the morning and evening, after individuals have consumed food and fluids, has not been profoundly explored. This study aimed to compare the systemic hemodynamic changes in healthy individuals between morning and evening PLR tests.

METHODS

In this study, the PLR test was performed twice a day. The first PLR test was performed between 08h00 and 09h00 in the morning, while the second PLR test was performed between 20h00 and 21h00 in the evening. Hemodynamic parameters were measured using an impedance cardiography monitor, and a cutoff value of a 10% increase in stroke volume (SV) during the PLR test was used to differentiate between preload responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

We included 50 healthy volunteers in this study. When comparing the morning and evening PLR test results, we found no PLR-induced differences in heart rate (-3 [-8-2] vs. -2 [-8-4] beats/min, = 0.870), SV (11 [5-22] vs. 12 [4-20] mL, = 0.853) or cardiac output (0.7 [0.2-1.3] vs. 0.8 [0.1-1.4] L/min, = 0.639). We also observed no differences in the proportion of preload responders during the PLR test between the morning and evening (64% vs. 66%, = 0.99). However, there was a moderate agreement between the two PLR tests (morning and evening) (kappa = 0.429, = 0.012). There was a moderate correlation between the changes in SV between the two PLR tests (r = 0.50, < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In young, healthy individuals, we observed no change in the systemic hemodynamic responsiveness to the PLR test between the morning and evening, without restriction of fluid and food intake.

摘要

背景

被动抬腿(PLR)试验旨在预测液体反应性并减少液体过载。然而,健康个体对PLR试验的血流动力学反应以及在一天中、早晚之间、个体摄入食物和液体后其如何变化,尚未得到深入研究。本研究旨在比较健康个体早晚PLR试验中的全身血流动力学变化。

方法

在本研究中,PLR试验每天进行两次。第一次PLR试验在上午08:00至09:00之间进行,而第二次PLR试验在晚上20:00至21:00之间进行。使用阻抗心动图监测仪测量血流动力学参数,并使用PLR试验期间每搏输出量(SV)增加10%的临界值来区分前负荷反应者和无反应者。

结果

本研究纳入了50名健康志愿者。比较早晚PLR试验结果时,我们发现PLR试验在心率(-3[-8 - 2]次/分钟 vs. -2[-8 - 4]次/分钟,P = 0.870)、SV(11[5 - 22]毫升 vs. 12[4 - 20]毫升,P = 0.853)或心输出量(0.7[0.2 - 1.3]升/分钟 vs. 0.8[0.1 - 1.4]升/分钟,P = 0.639)方面没有引起差异。我们还观察到早晚PLR试验期间前负荷反应者的比例没有差异(64%对66%,P = 0.99)。然而,两次PLR试验(早晚)之间存在中度一致性(kappa = 0.429,P = 0.012)。两次PLR试验之间的SV变化存在中度相关性(r = 0.50,P < 0.001)。

结论

在年轻健康个体中,我们观察到在无液体和食物摄入限制的情况下,早晚对PLR试验的全身血流动力学反应没有变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3813/10381249/8ff4bef2df55/life-13-01606-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3813/10381249/1478714b1cf0/life-13-01606-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3813/10381249/8f3c5a00f517/life-13-01606-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3813/10381249/8ff4bef2df55/life-13-01606-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3813/10381249/1478714b1cf0/life-13-01606-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3813/10381249/8f3c5a00f517/life-13-01606-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3813/10381249/8ff4bef2df55/life-13-01606-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in Hemodynamic Response to Passive Leg Raising Tests during the Day in Healthy Individuals: The Question of Normovolemia.健康个体白天被动抬腿试验中血流动力学反应的差异:血容量正常的问题。
Life (Basel). 2023 Jul 21;13(7):1606. doi: 10.3390/life13071606.
2
[The value of passive leg raising test in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction].[被动抬腿试验在预测脓毒症诱发心功能不全患者液体反应性中的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Sep;27(9):729-34.
3
Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo/FloTrac device.被动抬腿对自主呼吸患者每搏量的影响:超声心动图与 Vigileo/FloTrac 设备的比较。
Crit Care. 2009;13(6):R195. doi: 10.1186/cc8195. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
4
Assessment of fluid responsiveness with end-tidal carbon dioxide using a simplified passive leg raising maneuver: a prospective observational study.使用简化被动抬腿动作通过呼气末二氧化碳评估液体反应性:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;63(9):1033-41. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0677-z. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
5
[Clinical observation of non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor combined passive leg raising test in predicting the children volume responsiveness].无创超声心输出量监测联合被动抬腿试验预测儿童容量反应性的临床观察
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Jan;26(1):46-50. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.01.010.
6
Non-invasive stroke volume measurement and passive leg raising predict volume responsiveness in medical ICU patients: an observational cohort study.非侵入性每搏量测量和被动抬腿预测内科 ICU 患者的容量反应性:一项观察性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2009;13(4):R111. doi: 10.1186/cc7955. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
7
Observational study on passive leg raising and the autonomic nervous system.被动抬腿观察研究与自主神经系统。
Physiol Rep. 2022 Dec;10(24):e15537. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15537.
8
Evaluation of radial artery pulse pressure effects on detection of stroke volume changes after volume loading maneuvers in cardiac surgical patients.评估心脏手术患者容量负荷操作后桡动脉脉压对每搏量变化检测的影响。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jun;8(12):787. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-847.
9
Passive leg raising as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in patients with severe sepsis.被动抬腿试验作为严重脓毒症患者液体反应性的预测指标。
World J Emerg Med. 2012;3(3):191-6. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2012.03.006.
10
Effect of Systolic Cardiac Function on Passive Leg Raising for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness: A Prospective Observational Study.收缩期心功能对被动抬腿预测液体反应性的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Feb 5;131(3):253-261. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.223841.

引用本文的文献

1
Are We Always Right? Evaluation of the Performance and Knowledge of the Passive Leg Raise Test in Detecting Volume Responsiveness in Critical Care Patients: A National German Survey.我们总是正确的吗?评估被动抬腿试验在危重症患者容量反应性检测中的性能和知识:一项德国全国性调查。
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 25;13(9):2518. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092518.

本文引用的文献

1
Observational study on passive leg raising and the autonomic nervous system.被动抬腿观察研究与自主神经系统。
Physiol Rep. 2022 Dec;10(24):e15537. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15537.
2
To identify normovolemia in humans: The stroke volume response to passive leg raising vs. head-down tilt.为了在人体中确定正常血容量:被动抬腿与头低位倾斜对每搏量的反应。
Physiol Rep. 2022 Jul;10(14):e15216. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15216.
3
Assessing fluid responsiveness during spontaneous breathing.评估自主呼吸期间的液体反应性。
J Anesth. 2022 Oct;36(5):579-582. doi: 10.1007/s00540-022-03075-2. Epub 2022 May 23.
4
Non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness to guide fluid therapy in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study.在急诊科对脓毒症患者进行液体反应性的无创评估以指导液体治疗:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Jun;38(6):416-422. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209771. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
5
Measurement site of inferior vena cava diameter affects the accuracy with which fluid responsiveness can be predicted in spontaneously breathing patients: a post hoc analysis of two prospective cohorts.下腔静脉直径的测量部位会影响对自主呼吸患者液体反应性预测的准确性:两项前瞻性队列研究的事后分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Dec 11;10(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00786-1.
6
Fluid Overload and Mortality in Adult Critical Care Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.成人重症监护患者液体超负荷与死亡率:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1862-1870. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004617.
7
Impact of deep breathing on predictability of stroke volume variation in spontaneous breathing patients.深呼吸对自主呼吸患者每搏量变异预测性的影响。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 May;64(5):648-655. doi: 10.1111/aas.13541. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
Precision and consistency of the passive leg raising maneuver for determining fluid responsiveness with bioreactance non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in critically ill patients and healthy volunteers.被动抬腿试验在危重症患者和健康志愿者中应用生物电抗法无创心排血量监测指导液体反应性的精确性和一致性。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 27;14(9):e0222956. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222956. eCollection 2019.
9
Circadian Rhythm of Vascular Function in Midlife Adults.中年成年人血管功能的昼夜节律。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019 Jun;39(6):1203-1211. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312682.
10
What is the normal haemodynamic response to passive leg raise? A study of healthy volunteers.被动抬腿时的正常血液动力学反应是什么?一项健康志愿者的研究。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Sep;35(9):544-549. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206836. Epub 2018 May 4.