• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物相互作用中的结构不对称性:理解和预测生态持续性的工具。

Structural asymmetry in biotic interactions as a tool to understand and predict ecological persistence.

机构信息

Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Electrónica, Automática y Física Aplicada, ETSIDI, Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

Ecol Lett. 2023 Oct;26(10):1647-1662. doi: 10.1111/ele.14291. Epub 2023 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1111/ele.14291
PMID:37515408
Abstract

A universal feature of ecological systems is that species do not interact with others with the same sign and strength. Yet, the consequences of this asymmetry in biotic interactions for the short- and long-term persistence of individual species and entire communities remains unclear. Here, we develop a set of metrics to evaluate how asymmetric interactions among species translate to asymmetries in their individual vulnerability to extinction under changing environmental conditions. These metrics, which solve previous limitations of how to independently quantify the size from the shape of the so-called feasibility domain, provide rigorous advances to understand simultaneously why some species and communities present more opportunities to persist than others. We further demonstrate that our shape-related metrics are useful to predict short-term changes in species' relative abundances during 7 years in a Mediterranean grassland. Our approach is designed to be applied to any ecological system regardless of the number of species and type of interactions. With it, we show that is possible to obtain both mechanistic and predictive information on ecological persistence for individual species and entire communities, paving the way for a stronger integration of theoretical and empirical research.

摘要

生态系统的一个普遍特征是,物种之间不会以相同的符号和强度相互作用。然而,生物相互作用的这种不对称性对单个物种和整个群落的短期和长期持续存在的后果仍不清楚。在这里,我们开发了一组指标来评估物种之间的不对称相互作用如何转化为它们在变化的环境条件下个体灭绝脆弱性的不对称性。这些指标解决了以前如何独立量化所谓可行性域的大小和形状的限制,为理解为什么某些物种和群落比其他物种和群落具有更多的生存机会提供了严格的进展。我们进一步证明,我们的形状相关指标可用于预测地中海草原 7 年内物种相对丰度的短期变化。我们的方法旨在应用于任何生态系统,无论物种数量和相互作用类型如何。通过这种方法,我们表明可以为单个物种和整个群落获得关于生态持久性的机制和预测信息,为理论和经验研究的更紧密结合铺平了道路。

相似文献

1
Structural asymmetry in biotic interactions as a tool to understand and predict ecological persistence.生物相互作用中的结构不对称性:理解和预测生态持续性的工具。
Ecol Lett. 2023 Oct;26(10):1647-1662. doi: 10.1111/ele.14291. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
2
A guideline to study the feasibility domain of multi-trophic and changing ecological communities.研究多营养级和变化的生态群落可行性域的指南。
J Theor Biol. 2018 Aug 7;450:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
3
How biotic interactions structure species' responses to perturbations.生物相互作用如何影响物种对干扰的响应。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Oct;291(2032):20240930. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0930. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
4
Non-random interactions within and across guilds shape the potential to coexist in multi-trophic ecological communities.种内和种间的非随机相互作用塑造了多营养生态群落中共存的潜力。
Ecol Lett. 2023 Jun;26(6):831-842. doi: 10.1111/ele.14206. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Individual differences determine the strength of ecological interactions.个体差异决定生态相互作用的强度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 21;117(29):17068-17073. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2000635117. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
7
Toward a mechanistic understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization.迈向对生物同质化的机制理解与预测。
Am Nat. 2003 Oct;162(4):442-60. doi: 10.1086/378212. Epub 2003 Oct 16.
8
Species persistence under climate change: a geographical scale coexistence problem.物种在气候变化下的存续:一个地理尺度的共存问题。
Ecol Lett. 2018 Nov;21(11):1589-1603. doi: 10.1111/ele.13108. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
Rapid monitoring of ecological persistence.快速监测生态持续性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 16;120(20):e2211288120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211288120. Epub 2023 May 8.
10
Structural forecasting of species persistence under changing environments.在变化环境下物种持续生存的结构预测。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Oct;23(10):1511-1521. doi: 10.1111/ele.13582. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Structural stability estimated through critical perturbation determines evolutionary persistence in mutualistic model ecosystems.通过临界扰动估计的结构稳定性决定了互利共生模型生态系统中的进化持久性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Aug 6;12(8):250123. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250123. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Global Change Asymmetrically Rewires Ecosystems.全球变化以不对称方式重塑生态系统。
Ecol Lett. 2025 Jul;28(7):e70174. doi: 10.1111/ele.70174.
3
A Continuum From Positive to Negative Interactions Drives Plant Species' Performance in a Diverse Community.
从积极到消极相互作用的连续体驱动植物物种在多样化群落中的表现。
Ecol Lett. 2025 Jan;28(1):e70059. doi: 10.1111/ele.70059.
4
Interaction network structure explains species' temporal persistence in empirical plant-pollinator communities.互作网络结构解释了经验植物-传粉者群落中物种的时间持久性。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar;8(3):423-429. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02314-3. Epub 2024 Feb 1.