Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY.
Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY; Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;31(12):1140-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
To examine whether Subjective Cognitive Complaints (SCCs) predicted incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
Prospective Study.
Central Control of Mobility and Aging (CCMA), a cohort study of community-residing older adults.
Participants were dementia-free community-residing older adults.
SCCs were assessed at the baseline and via bi-monthly structured phone interviews during the first year using the Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8). Nonpersistent status required one or two SCCs endorsements and Persistent status required three or more SCCs endorsements. Outcome, presence of mild cognitive impairments (MCI) was determined by established case conference diagnostic procedures. Participants were followed annually. Generalized estimating equations (GEE), logistic model type, were used to determine the odds of developing MCI during follow-up. SCCs served as the three-level predictor (no/nonpersistent/persistent) and cognitive status (MCI versus normal) as the binary outcome. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, education, race, health status, depressive symptoms, and global cognition.
The sample (n=454; mean age=75.67 ± 6.43; %female=55.3) included 245 participants who reported no SCCs, 156 who reported 1-2 SCCs, and 53 who reported 3 or more SCCs. Sixty-eight participants developed MCI during follow-up. Results showed that compared to no SCCs, persistent SCCs, and nonpersistent SCCs were significantly associated with increased odds of developing MCI during follow-up.
The presence of SCCs regardless of their persistence was associated with increased odds of developing MCI even when adjusting for objectively-assessed cognitive performance.
探讨主观认知抱怨(SCCs)是否预测轻度认知障碍(MCI)的发生。
前瞻性研究。
移动和老龄化中央控制(CCMA),一项针对社区居住的老年人的队列研究。
参与者为无痴呆的社区居住的老年人。
SCCs 在基线时进行评估,并在第一年通过每月两次的结构化电话访谈进行评估,使用确定痴呆症 8 项(AD8)。非持续性状态需要一到两个 SCC 认可,持续性状态需要三个或更多的 SCC 认可。结果,轻度认知障碍(MCI)的存在通过既定的病例会议诊断程序确定。参与者每年进行随访。使用广义估计方程(GEE)、逻辑模型类型,确定随访期间发生 MCI 的可能性。SCCs 作为三水平预测因子(无/非持续性/持续性),认知状态(MCI 与正常)作为二分类结果。分析调整了年龄、性别、教育、种族、健康状况、抑郁症状和整体认知。
样本(n=454;平均年龄 75.67 ± 6.43;女性占 55.3%)包括 245 名无 SCCs 的参与者、156 名报告 1-2 项 SCCs 的参与者和 53 名报告 3 项或更多 SCCs 的参与者。68 名参与者在随访期间发生 MCI。结果表明,与无 SCCs 相比,持续性 SCCs 和非持续性 SCCs 与随访期间发生 MCI 的几率增加显著相关。
无论 SCCs 是否持续存在,其存在都与发生 MCI 的几率增加相关,即使在调整客观评估的认知表现后也是如此。