Department of Gastric Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(16):17126-17138. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6362. Epub 2023 Jul 30.
Ovarian metastasis from gastric cancer (GC) is characterized by aggressive biological behavior and poor outcome. Currently, there is no standard treatment mode for such patients. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy of conversion therapy in patients with synchronous ovarian metastasis from GC in this study.
About 219 GC patients with ovarian metastasis in 2011-2020 were enrolled. Two groups were established based on the different treatment: the conversion therapy group (chemotherapy combined with surgical resection, CS group) and the non-conversion therapy group (NCS group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to analyze the efficacy of different treatment modes on the prognosis of these patients.
Ninety-two patients were included according to PSM results, with 46 patients each in CS and NCS groups. The median overall survival (OS) in the CS group was notably better than that in the NCS group (p < 0.001). Twenty-six patients (56.52%) in the CS group achieved R0 resection, and they had a better prognosis (p = 0.003). Compared with patients who underwent simultaneous gastrectomy and ovarian metastasectomy (CSb group), those who underwent ovarian metastasectomy before systemic chemotherapy (CSa group) had a higher R0 resection rate (p = 0.016) and longer survival time (p = 0.002). A total of 38 patients (41.30%) across both groups received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and these patients had a better survival (p = 0.043).
The conversion therapy is safe and effective for patients with synchronous ovarian metastasis from GC and can improve their prognosis. However, our results need to be confirmed by more randomized controlled clinical studies.
胃癌(GC)卵巢转移的特点是具有侵袭性的生物学行为和较差的预后。目前,此类患者尚无标准的治疗模式。因此,我们在这项研究中评估了转换治疗对 GC 伴同期卵巢转移患者的疗效。
纳入 2011 年至 2020 年间 219 例 GC 伴卵巢转移患者。根据不同治疗方法分为转换治疗组(化疗联合手术切除,CS 组)和非转换治疗组(NCS 组)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析不同治疗模式对患者预后的影响。
根据 PSM 结果,共纳入 92 例患者,CS 组和 NCS 组各 46 例。CS 组的中位总生存期(OS)明显长于 NCS 组(p<0.001)。CS 组 26 例(56.52%)患者达到 R0 切除,预后较好(p=0.003)。与同时行胃癌和卵巢转移切除术的患者(CSb 组)相比,先行全身化疗后行卵巢转移切除术的患者(CSa 组)R0 切除率更高(p=0.016),生存时间更长(p=0.002)。两组共有 38 例(41.30%)患者接受了腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC),这些患者的生存时间更好(p=0.043)。
转换治疗对 GC 伴同期卵巢转移患者安全有效,可改善患者预后。但本研究结果还需更多随机对照临床试验进一步证实。