Ross Megan H, Neish Calum, Setchell Jenny
RECOVER Injury Research Centre, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Oct;40(10):2309-2320. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2241079. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
Individuals identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual and other related identities (LGBTQIA+) experience challenges with healthcare, including physiotherapy. To understand potential contributions to poor experiences, this study explored physiotherapists' experiences and perspectives about working with members of LGBTQIA+ communities.
This study employed a qualitative research design, suitable for exploring the experiences and perspectives of individuals within the physiotherapy context. The sample consisted of physiotherapists working in Australia who participated in a larger survey study. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was conducted using a relativistic and queer theoretical framework with a reflexive thematic approach.
Eighteen physiotherapists with diverse sexual orientations participated in the interviews. While all participants identified as women or men, not all used binary gender pronouns. Five key themes were developed: 1) "anti-discrimination" regarding choice of language and providing safe environments; 2) "current and historical discrimination" against LGBTQIA+ individuals; 3) "taking an equality approach" when working with LGBTQIA+ patients; 4) "knowledge of LGBTQIA+ health" in a broad sense and specifically with transgender and gender-diverse people; and 5) "managing own reactions" with respect to individual biases and discomfort.
Underpinning all themes was the overarching concept of cis/hetero/endonormativity. Assuming normativity when working with LGBTQIA+ patients, is likely to have negative effects on patients' mental health, the therapeutic relationship and quality of care. In order to improve diversity, safety, inclusion and equity of care for LGBTQIA+ individuals, it is vital that normativity within physiotherapy is challenged.
自我认同为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿、双性人、无性恋者及其他相关身份(LGBTQIA+)的个体在医疗保健方面面临挑战,包括物理治疗。为了解导致不良体验的潜在因素,本研究探讨了物理治疗师与LGBTQIA+群体成员合作的经历和观点。
本研究采用定性研究设计,适用于探索物理治疗背景下个体的经历和观点。样本包括在澳大利亚工作并参与一项更大规模调查研究的物理治疗师。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,访谈进行了录音并逐字转录。使用相对论和酷儿理论框架以及反思性主题方法进行数据分析。
18名性取向各异的物理治疗师参与了访谈。虽然所有参与者都认同自己为男性或女性,但并非所有人都使用二元性别代词。形成了五个关键主题:1)在语言选择和提供安全环境方面的“反歧视”;2)对LGBTQIA+个体的“当前和历史歧视”;3)与LGBTQIA+患者合作时“采取平等方法”;4)广义上以及特别是针对跨性别者和性别多样化人群的“LGBTQIA+健康知识”;5)关于个人偏见和不适的“管理自身反应”。
所有主题的基础是顺性别/异性恋/常态性的总体概念。在与LGBTQIA+患者合作时假设常态性可能会对患者的心理健康、治疗关系和护理质量产生负面影响。为了提高对LGBTQIA+个体护理的多样性、安全性、包容性和公平性,挑战物理治疗中的常态性至关重要。