• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于环境和经济生命周期评估的不同污水污泥焚烧处理的比较研究。

Comparative study of different sewage sludge incineration treatments based on environmental and economic life cycle assessment.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China.

Shenzhen Energy Environment Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, P.R. China.

出版信息

Waste Manag Res. 2024 May;42(5):418-429. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231187560. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1177/0734242X231187560
PMID:37519287
Abstract

Incineration is one of the most widely used treatments in the field of sewage sludge disposal. However, the choice of sewage sludge incineration process is still controversial. In this study, the comparative life cycle assessment of sewage sludge incineration processes, including the mono-incineration, co-incineration in coal-fired power plants and co-incineration in municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration plants, was carried out from the perspective of environment, carbon footprint and economy. The environmental assessment results show that terrestrial ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity, human carcinogenic toxicity and human non-carcinogenic toxicity are the most significant environmental impacts. And the environmental performance of co-incineration in coal-fired power plants is the best. Moreover, the environmental impact is most sensitive to the dehydrant, electricity and fly ash chelating agent. Co-incineration in MSW incineration plants has the lowest carbon emissions, with only 70.50% and 82% of the carbon emissions from mono-incineration and co-incineration in coal-fired power plants, respectively. Furthermore, sewage sludge mono-incineration has the highest disposal costs because of the higher depreciation and solid waste disposal costs. The comprehensive evaluation results reveal that the optimization should focus on the selection of dehydrant and fly ash chelating agent, as well as the improvement of the equipment efficiency.

摘要

焚烧是污水处理领域中应用最广泛的处理方法之一。然而,对于选择哪种污泥焚烧工艺仍然存在争议。本研究从环境、碳足迹和经济角度出发,对单独焚烧、燃煤电厂协同焚烧和城市生活垃圾(MSW)焚烧厂协同焚烧这三种污泥焚烧工艺进行了比较生命周期评估。环境评估结果表明,陆地生态毒性、淡水生态毒性、海洋生态毒性、人类致癌毒性和人类非致癌毒性是最显著的环境影响。燃煤电厂协同焚烧的环境性能最佳。此外,环境影响对脱水剂、电力和飞灰螯合剂最敏感。MSW 焚烧厂协同焚烧的碳排放量最低,分别比单独焚烧和燃煤电厂协同焚烧低 70.50%和 82%。此外,由于更高的折旧和固体废物处理成本,污泥单独焚烧的处理成本最高。综合评价结果表明,优化应侧重于选择脱水剂和飞灰螯合剂,并提高设备效率。

相似文献

1
Comparative study of different sewage sludge incineration treatments based on environmental and economic life cycle assessment.基于环境和经济生命周期评估的不同污水污泥焚烧处理的比较研究。
Waste Manag Res. 2024 May;42(5):418-429. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231187560. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge co-incineration in a coal-based power station.生活污水污泥在基于煤的电站中的共焚烧生命周期评估。
Waste Manag. 2013 Sep;33(9):1843-52. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
3
Environmental, energy, and economic impact assessment of sludge management alternatives based on incineration.基于焚烧的污泥管理替代方案的环境、能源和经济影响评估。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 1;321:115848. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115848. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
4
Co-incineration effect of sewage sludge and municipal solid waste on the behavior of heavy metals by phosphorus.污水污泥和城市固体废物共焚烧对磷固定重金属行为的影响。
Waste Manag. 2022 Oct;152:112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
5
Leachability of heavy metals from lightweight aggregates made with sewage sludge and municipal solid waste incineration fly ash.由污水污泥和城市固体废弃物焚烧飞灰制成的轻质集料中重金属的浸出性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 May 7;12(5):4992-5005. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120504992.
6
Life cycle assessment of environmental impact on municipal solid waste incineration power generation.城市生活垃圾焚烧发电对环境影响的生命周期评估
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(46):65435-65446. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15483-0. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
7
[Emission Characteristics and Toxicity Effects of Halogenated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Coal-Fired and Waste Incineration Power Plants].[燃煤电厂和垃圾焚烧发电厂中卤代多环芳烃的排放特征及毒性效应]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Apr 8;42(4):1660-1667. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202007298.
8
Flow analysis of major and trace elements in residues from large-scale sewage sludge incineration.大规模污水污泥焚烧残渣中主要和微量元素的流动分析。
J Environ Sci (China). 2021 Apr;102:99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
9
Simulation of co-incineration of sewage sludge with municipal solid waste in a grate furnace incinerator.炉排炉中城市生活垃圾与污水污泥混烧的模拟。
Waste Manag. 2012 Mar;32(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.032. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
10
Effects of the basicity on the comelting conditions of municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash and sewage sludge ash.碱度对城市固体废物焚烧飞灰和污水污泥灰熔融条件的影响。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006 Dec;56(12):1743-9. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464579.